We don't want to set the name directly because then starting the pod
can fail when the node is temporarily out of resources
(https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/87855).
For CSI driver deployments, we have three options:
- modify the pod spec with custom code, similar
to how the NodeSelection utility code does it
- add variants of SetNodeSelection and SetNodeAffinity which
work with a pod spec instead of a pod
- change their parameter from pod to pod spec and then use
them also when patching a pod spec
The last approach is used here because it seems more general. There
might be other cases in the future where there's only a pod spec that
needs to be modified.
Implementing a test suite was impossible outside of the
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites package because all
interfaces and structs used by them were private.
As part of revamping the API, genericVolumeTestResource also gets
exported because it is useful for other test suites. Because the
TestResource interface became obsolete a while ago and isn't used
anymore, the new name is just testsuites.VolumeResource.
testpatterns.CSIInlineVolume needs special handling in a few places.
It can now be used in a test pattern for a test suite that uses a
VolumeResource instance.
Use POST method instead of running local kubectl.
Use ExecCommandInContainerWithFullOutput() instead of RunKubectl().
PodExec() takes additional framework arg, passed down in call chain.
VerifyExecInPodFail uses different error code cast as original
one causes test code Panic if used with new call method.
The assumption so far was that all drivers support read/write
volumes. That might not necessarily be true, so we have to let the
test driver specify it and then test accordingly.
Another aspect that is worth testing is whether the driver correctly
creates a new volume for each pod even if the volume attributes are
the same. However, drivers are not required to do that, so again we
have to let the test driver specify that.
The feature is complete and supported by an increasing number of CSI
drivers, but before it can be really used, it should be moved out of
alpha into beta.
Moving pod related functions from e2e/framework/pv_util.go to
e2e/framework/pod in order to allow refactoring of pv_util.go into its
own package.
Signed-off-by: alejandrox1 <alarcj137@gmail.com>
Also remove FS VolMode disruptive tests because they are already covered
through the subpath disruptive test cases.
Change-Id: Ice4b30b0d8fdcb1f7fd61e54d27f53557de9f13a
The PodInfo tests can be extended to also cover the new
csi.storage.k8s.io/ephemeral flag. However, the presence of that flag
depends on whether inline volume support is enabled, so tests that run
with and without the feature have to detect that at runtime.
Other tests have a feature tag and thus can assume that they only run
when that feature is enabled. However, we need a newer csi-mock driver
before we can actually ask it to publish an ephemeral inline volume.
The conceptual change is that the mode in which a volume gets handled
is derived from it's spec, not from the ability of the driver. In
practice, that is already how the code worked because it didn't
actually look at CSIDriver.Spec.Mode at all.
Therefore the code change itself is mostly just renaming "driver mode"
to "volume mode". In some places (CanDeviceMount, CanAttach) the
feature check that was used elsewhere seemed to be missing. Now their
code path for ephemeral volumes are also only entered if that feature
is enabled.
The sanity check whether a CSI driver is being used correctly still
needs to be implemented.
Related-to: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/79624
