The "error waiting for expected CSI calls" is redundant because it's
immediately followed by checking that error with:
framework.ExpectNoError(err, "while waiting for all CSI calls")
The mock driver gets instructed to return a ResourceExhausted error
for the first CreateVolume invocation via the storage class
parameters.
How this should be handled depends on the situation: for normal
volumes, we just want external-scheduler to retry. For late binding,
we want to reschedule the pod. It also depends on topology support.
The code became obsolete with the introduction of parseMockLogs
because that will retrieve the log itself. For debugging of a running
test the normal pod output logging is sufficient.
parseMockLogs is called potentially multiple times while waiting for
output. Dumping all CSI calls each time is quite verbose and
repetitive. To verify what the driver has done already, the normal
capturing of the container log can be used instead:
csi-mockplugin-0/mock@127.0.0.1: gRPCCall: {"Method":"/csi.v1.Node/NodePublishVolume","Request"...
As seen in some test
runs (https://prow.k8s.io/view/gcs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/89041),
retrieving output can fail with "the server rejected our request for
an unknown reason (get pods csi-mockplugin-0)".
If this truly an intermittent error, then the existing retry logic in
the callers can deal with this.
Especially related to "uncertain" global mounts. A large refactoring of CSI
mock tests were necessary:
- to be able to script the driver to return errors as required by the test
- to parse the CSI driver logs to check kubelet called the right CSI calls
the e2e TCP CLOSE_WAIT has to create a server pod and then, from
a client, it creates a connection but doesn't notify the server
when closing it, so it stays on the CLOSE_WAIT status until it
times out.
Current test use a simple timeout for waiting the that server pod
is ready, it's better to use WaitForPodsReady for waiting that
the pod is available to avoid problems on busy environments like
the CI.
It also deletes the pods once the tests finish to avoid leaking
pods.
The original logic was that dumping can stop (for example, due to
loosing the connection to the apiserver) and then will start again as
long as the container exists. That it duplicates output on restarts
is better than skipping output that might not have been dumped yet.
But that logic then also dumped the output of containers that have
terminated multiple times:
- logging is started, dumps all output and stops because the
container has terminated
- next check finds the container again, sees no active logger,
repeats
This wasn't a problem for short-lived logging in a custom
namespace (the way how it is done for CSI drivers in Kubernetes E2E),
but other testsuites (like the one from PMEM-CSI) keep logging running
for the entire test suite duration: there duplicate output became a
problem when adding driver redeployment as part of the suite's run.
To avoid duplicated output for terminated containers, which containers
have been handled is now stored permanently. For terminated containers,
restarting of dumping is prevented. This comes with the risk that if
the previous dumping ended before capturing all output, some output
will get lost.
Marking the start and stop of the log was also useful when streaming
to a single writer and thus gets enabled.
There were several sshPort values in e2e test packages because
we've migrated code from e2e framework by copying and pastting.
This adds common SSHPort on e2essh package to reduce such duplicated
code.
Conformance tests must not rely on the kubelet API in order to
pass. In this case, I think it's unnecessary to verify that a
kubelet observes the deletion within gracePeriod seconds. The
remaining checks in this test verify that pod deletion happens,
and that the pod is removed.
Conformance tests must not rely on the kubelet API in order to
pass. SchedulerPredicates tests attempt to use the kubelet API
in their BeforeEach, some of which are tagged as Conformance.
Is there a compelling reason to use the kubelet's view of pods
for a given node instead of the apiserver's view of the pods?
we print yaml, so you can use yaml tools like `yq`:
```
e2e.test --list-conformance-tests | yq r - --collect *.testname
```
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
it turns out that the e2e test was not using the timeout used to
hold the CLOSE_WAIT status, hence the test was flake depending
on how fast it checked the conntrack table.
This PR replaces the dependency on ssh using a pod to check the conntrack
entries on the host in a loop, to make the test more robust
and reduce the flakiness due to race conditions and/or ssh issues.
It also fixes a bug trying to grep the conntrack entry, where
the error was swallowed if a conntrack entry wasn't found.
Sometimes the pod has already been cleaned up by the time the test
tried to grab the logs.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting for client-a-jt4tf to complete.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for pod "client-a-jt4tf" in namespace "e2e-network-policy-c-9007" to be "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:38.072: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 6.270302ms
Mar 27 16:19:40.078: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 2.01233019s
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Succeeded", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 4.020186873s
STEP: Saw pod success
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf" satisfied condition "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:42.093: FAIL: Error getting container logs: the server could not find the requested resource (get pods client-a-jt4tf)
Full Stack Trace
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.checkNoConnectivity(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0xc001666400, 0xc000c32000)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1457 +0x2a0
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.testCannotConnect(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0x55587e9, 0x8, 0xc000c32000, 0x50)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1406 +0x1fc
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func13.2.7()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:285 +0x883
github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc001e47830, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:59 +0x41f
main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:238 +0x15d
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:826 +0x460
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x60d2d00, 0x9887ec8)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:914 +0x2fb
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:864
main.main.func1(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:59 +0x9c
main.main()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:60 +0x341
STEP: Cleaning up the pod client-a-jt4tf
STEP: Cleaning up the policy.
RestartControllerManager() is kube-controller specific function
and it is better to separate the function as subpackage of e2e
test framework.
In addition, the function made invalid dependency into e2essh.
So this separates the function into e2ekubesystem subpackage.
When deleting fails, the tests should be considered as failed,
too. Ignoring the error caused a wrong return code in the CSI mock
driver to go unnoticed (see
https://github.com/kubernetes-csi/csi-test/pull/250). The v3.1.0
release of the CSI mock driver fixes that.
The function is called from e2e/network test only, so this moves
the function into the test for reducing e2e/framework/util.go code
and removing invalid dependency on e2e test framework.
The function is for persistent volumes and it doesn't have any
reason why it stays in core test framework. So this moves the
function into e2epv package for reducing e2e/framework/util.go
code.
