Services can expose network applications that are running on
one or more Pods. User need to specify the Port and Protocol of the
network application, and network implementations must forward only
the traffic indicated in the Service, as it may present a security
problem if you allow to forward traffic to a backend if the user
didn't specify it.
Change-Id: I77fbb23c6415ed09dd81c4f2deb6df7a17de46f0
There are some implementations of service that use socket loadbalancing
instead of NAT. These implementations don't need to deal with the
conntrack cleanup, however, they need to cleanup the sockets that are
no longer needed, so the application does not get stuck forever.
This can happen in both TCP or UDP, but since UDP is stateless, the
situation is much complicated because does not have mechanisms like TCP
to detect that socket is no longer needed.
Change-Id: Ic2cfbdf6c8b1f1335e8b5964825dd1fa716fef53
This commit removes the legacy networkpolicy tests since they now have
complete appropriate coverage in the new netpol suite.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Stoycos <astoycos@redhat.com>
This touches cases where FromInt() is used on numeric constants, or
values which are already int32s, or int variables which are defined
close by and can be changed to int32s with little impact.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <skitt@redhat.com>
There are some e2e tets on networking services that depend on the
healthcheck nodeport to be available. However, the healtcheck nodeport
will be available asynchronously, so we should wait until it is
available on the tests and not fail hard if it is not.
Change-Id: I595402c070c263f0e7855ee8d5662ae975dbd1d3
The existing termination period of 600 seconds for pods on the
e2e test causes that those pods are kept running after the
test has finished. 100 seconds is a good compromise to avoid
leaving pods lingering and more than enought for the test to finish.
Change-Id: I993162a77125345df1829044dc2514e03b13a407
Annotation
As part of this change, kube-proxy accepts any value for either
annotation that is not "disabled".
Change-Id: Idfc26eb4cc97ff062649dc52ed29823a64fc59a4
The test creates a Service exposing two protocols on the same port
and a backend that replies on both protocols.
1. Test that Service with works for both protocol
2. Update Service to expose only the TCP port
3. Verify that TCP works and UDP does not work
4. Update Service to expose only the UDP port
5. Verify that TCP does not work and UDP does work
Change-Id: Ic4f3a6509e332aa5694d20dfc3b223d7063a7871
Test 2 scenarios:
- pod can connect to a terminating pods
- terminating pod can connect to other pods
Change-Id: Ia5dc4e7370cc055df452bf7cbaddd9901b4d229d
A Service can use multiple EndpointSlices for its backend, when
using custom Endpoint Slices, the data plane should forward traffic
to any of the endpoints in the Endpointslices that belong to the
Service.
Change-Id: I80b42522bf6ab443050697a29b94d8245943526f
All of these issues were reported by https://github.com/nunnatsa/ginkgolinter.
Fixing these issues is useful (several expressions get simpler, using
framework.ExpectNoError is better because it has additional support for
failures) and a necessary step for enabling that linter in our golangci-lint
invocation.
- test/e2e/framework/*.go should have very minimal dependencies.
We can enforce that via import-boss.
- What each test/e2e/framework/* sub-package uses is less relevant,
although ideally it also should be as minimal as possible in each case.
Enforcing this via import-boss ensures that new dependencies get flagged as
problem and thus will get additional scrutiny. It might be okay to add them,
but it needs to be considered.
The recently introduced failure handling in ExpectNoError depends on error
wrapping: if an error prefix gets added with `fmt.Errorf("foo: %v", err)`, then
ExpectNoError cannot detect that the root cause is an assertion failure and
then will add another useless "unexpected error" prefix and will not dump the
additional failure information (currently the backtrace inside the E2E
framework).
Instead of manually deciding on a case-by-case basis where %w is needed, all
error wrapping was updated automatically with
sed -i "s/fmt.Errorf\(.*\): '*\(%s\|%v\)'*\",\(.* err)\)/fmt.Errorf\1: %w\",\3/" $(git grep -l 'fmt.Errorf' test/e2e*)
This may be unnecessary in some cases, but it's not wrong.
This renames PodsResponding to WaitForPodsResponding for the sake of
consistency and adds a timeout parameter. That is necessary because some other
users of NewProxyResponseChecker used a much lower timeout (2min vs. 15min).
Besides simplifying some code, it also makes it easier to rewrite
ProxyResponseChecker because it only gets used in WaitForPodsResponding.
The recently introduced failure handling in ExpectNoError depends on error
wrapping: if an error prefix gets added with `fmt.Errorf("foo: %v", err)`, then
ExpectNoError cannot detect that the root cause is an assertion failure and
then will add another useless "unexpected error" prefix and will not dump the
additional failure information (currently the backtrace inside the E2E
framework).
Instead of manually deciding on a case-by-case basis where %w is needed, all
error wrapping was updated automatically with
sed -i "s/fmt.Errorf\(.*\): '*\(%s\|%v\)'*\",\(.* err)\)/fmt.Errorf\1: %w\",\3/" $(git grep -l 'fmt.Errorf' test/e2e*)
This may be unnecessary in some cases, but it's not wrong.
This renames PodsResponding to WaitForPodsResponding for the sake of
consistency and adds a timeout parameter. That is necessary because some other
users of NewProxyResponseChecker used a much lower timeout (2min vs. 15min).
Besides simplifying some code, it also makes it easier to rewrite
ProxyResponseChecker because it only gets used in WaitForPodsResponding.
This consolidates timeout handling. In the future, configuration of all
timeouts via a configuration file might get added. For now, the same three
legacy command line flags for the timeouts that get moved continue to be
supported.
The "[sig-network] DNS HostNetwork should resolve DNS of partial qualified
names for services on hostNetwork pods with dnsPolicy:
ClusterFirstWithHostNet" test assumes that a service named "kube-dns"
exists in the "kube-system" namespace. This assumption is valid if the
cluster was configured using kubeadm, but the assumption may be invalid
otherwise.
As the test uses dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst (as opposed to dnsPolicy: None),
it does not need to specify the name server in dnsConfig. Omitting
dnsConfig.nameservers obviates the need to look up the service.
Follow-up to commit add4652352.
* test/e2e/network/dns.go: Don't look up or use the kube-dns cluster IP
address as it might not exist on clusters that were not configured using
kubeadm.
