It turns out that the dual-stack feature enabled doesn't mean that
the cluster MUST be dual-stack, it only indicates that it MAY be
dual-stack but CAN be single-stack.
We should relax the validation to allow single-stack clusters
with dual-stack enabled.
If a Node name in the cluster is already taken and this Node is Ready,
prevent TLS bootsrap on "kubeadm join" and exit early.
This change requires that a new ClusterRole is granted to the
"system:bootstrappers:kubeadm:default-node-token" group to be
able get Nodes in the cluster. The same group already has access
to obtain objects such as the KubeletConfiguration and kubeadm's
ClusterConfiguration.
The motivation of this change is to prevent undefined behavior
and the potential control-plane breakdown if such a cluster
is racing to have two nodes with the same name for long periods
of time.
The following values are validated in the following precedence
from lower to higher:
- actual hostname
- NodeRegistration.Name (or "--node-name") from JoinConfiguration
- "--hostname-override" passed via kubeletExtraArgs
If the user decides to not let kubeadm know about a custom node name
and to instead override the hostname from a kubelet systemd unit file,
kubeadm will not be able to detect the problem.
- Extend the exponential backoff for add/remove/... retry to
11 steps ~=106 seconds. From experiments for 3 and more members
the race can take more that ~=26 seconds.
- Increase the dialTimeout for client creation to 40 seconds.
20 seconds seems racy for 3 and more members.
For the etcd client, amend AddMember() to handle a very
rare bug when multiple members can end up with the same
name. Match the member peer address and assign it the name of
the member we are adding. For the rest of the members with missing
names use their member IDs as name. The etcd node is not disrupted
by the unknown names.
The important aspects are:
- The number of members of the initial cluster must match
the members in the cluster.
- The member we are current adding is present in the initial cluster.
As part of #68522, Switching off the cAdvisor v1 Json API that we expose
directly. These include /stats/, /stats/container, /stats/{podName}/{containerName},
and /stats/{namespace}/{podName}/{uid}/{containerName}
The CoreDNS GA feature-gate in kubeadm was deprecated since 1.13.
The k8s policy is to remove the gate 2 releases after it transitions
to GA:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-policy/#deprecation
We kept it around for longer to prevent existing setups from breaking
as it caused minimal maintenance overhead.
This creates a new EndpointSliceProxying feature gate to cover EndpointSlice
consumption (kube-proxy) and allow the existing EndpointSlice feature gate to
focus on EndpointSlice production only. Along with that addition, this enables
the EndpointSlice feature gate by default, now only affecting the controller.
The rationale here is that it's really difficult to guarantee all EndpointSlices
are created in a cluster upgrade process before kube-proxy attempts to consume
them. Although masters are generally upgraded before nodes, and in most cases,
the controller would have enough time to create EndpointSlices before a new node
with kube-proxy spun up, there are plenty of edge cases where that might not be
the case. The primary limitation on EndpointSlice creation is the API rate limit
of 20QPS. In clusters with a lot of endpoints and/or with a lot of other API
requests, it could be difficult to create all the EndpointSlices before a new
node with kube-proxy targeting EndpointSlices spun up.
Separating this into 2 feature gates allows for a more gradual rollout with the
EndpointSlice controller being enabled by default in 1.18, and EndpointSlices
for kube-proxy being enabled by default in the next release.
The warning message
```
[config] WARNING: Ignored YAML document with GroupVersionKind ...
```
is printed for all GVKs that are not part of the kubeadm core types.
This is wrong as the component config types are supported and successfully
parsed and used despite the fact that the warning is printed for them too.
Hence this simple fix first checks if the group of the GVK is a supported
component config group and the warning is printed only if it's not.
Signed-off-by: Rostislav M. Georgiev <rostislavg@vmware.com>
