Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Do not recycle volumes that are used by pods
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Recycler should wait until all pods that use a volume are finished.
Consider this scenario:
1. User creates a PVC that's bound to a NFS PV.
2. User creates a pod that uses the PVC
3. User deletes the PVC.
Now the PV gets `Released` (the PVC does not exists) and recycled, however the PV is still mounted to a running pod. PVC protection won't help us, because it puts finalizers on PVC that is under user's control and user can remove it.
This PR checks that there is no pod that uses a PV before it recycles it.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55606, 59185, 58763, 59072, 59251). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix a typo in pkg/controller/volume/persistentvolume/pv_controller.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix typo (a -> an)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
none
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
When a PVC explicitly requests specific PV and the PV does not match,
we should tell the user what exactly does not match.
From:
Volume's size is smaller than requested or volume's class does not match with claim
To:
Cannot bind to requested volume "<volume name>": %s
where %s is one of:
- requested PV is too small
- storageClasseNames do not match
- incompatible volumeMode
- error checking volumeMode: api defaulting for volumeMode failed (this should not ever happen)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 56375, 56872, 57053, 57165, 57218). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improved event generation in volume mount,attach, and extend operations
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#57217
refactored mount, attach, extend operation's so that all failures generate events and event generation is more consistent.
```release-note
Improved event generation in volume mount, attach, and extend operations
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54604, 55781, 55806, 55935, 55991). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use core client with explicit version
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Core client without explicit version has been deprecated, change them to the one with explicit version.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes partially #55993
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/cc @caesarxuchao @k82cn @sttts @kevin-wangzefeng
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51321, 55969, 55039, 56183, 55976). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Topology aware volume scheduler and PV controller changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Scheduler and PV controller changes to support volume topology aware scheduling, as specified in kubernetes/community#1168
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#54435
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
* I've split the PR into logical commits to make it easier to review
* The remaining TODOs I plan to address next release unless you think it needs to be done now
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adds alpha support for volume scheduling, which allows the scheduler to make PersistentVolume binding decisions while respecting the Pod's scheduling requirements. Dynamic provisioning is not supported with this feature yet.
Action required for existing users of the LocalPersistentVolumes alpha feature:
* The VolumeScheduling feature gate also has to be enabled on kube-scheduler and kube-controller-manager.
* The NoVolumeNodeConflict predicate has been removed. For non-default schedulers, update your scheduler policy.
* The CheckVolumeBinding predicate has to be enabled in non-default schedulers.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Block volumes Support: CRI, volumemanager and operationexecutor changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR contains following items to enable block volumes support feature.
- container runtime interface change
- volumemanager changes
- operationexecuto changes
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Based on this proposal (kubernetes/community#805) and this feature issue: kubernetes/features#351
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
There are another PRs related to this functionality.
(#50457) API Change
(#53385) VolumeMode PV-PVC Binding change
(#51494) Container runtime interface change, volumemanager changes, operationexecutor changes
(#55112) Block volume: Command line printer update
Plugins
(#51493) Block volumes Support: FC plugin update
(#54752) Block volumes Support: iSCSI plugin update
**Release note**:
```
Adds alpha support for block volume, which allows the users to attach raw block volume to their pod without filesystem on top of the volume.
```
/cc @msau42 @liggitt @jsafrane @saad-ali @erinboyd @screeley44
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54987, 55221, 54099, 55144, 54215). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Should not sync the volume when claim.Spec.VolumeName is null
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
PV controller should send events to PVCs and not PVs when a PVC requests PV
that's either too small or has mismatching StorageClass.
Regular users can't see events on PVs so `kubectl describe pvc` is the only
way how to tell user that something is wrong.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add storageClass.mountOptions and use it in all applicable plugins
split off from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50919 and still dependent on it. cc @gnufied
issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/168
```release-note
Add mount options field to StorageClass. The options listed there are automatically added to PVs provisioned using the class.
```
When API server crashes *after* saving a provisioned PV and before sending
200 OK, the controller tries to save the PV again. In this case, it gets
AlreadyExists error, which should be interpreted as success and not as error.
Especially, a volume that corresponds to the PV should not be deleted in the
underlying storage.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51441, 51356, 51460)
Don't update pvc.status.capacity if pvc is already Bound
As discussed here https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/657#discussion_r128008128, in order for `pvc.status.Capacity < pv.Spec.Capcity` to be the mechanism for volume filesystem* resize, the pv controller should stop updating pvc.status.Capacity every resync period.
/assign @jsafrane
/sig storage
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add volume operation metrics to operation executor and PV controller
This PR implements the proposal for high level volume metrics https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/809
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
~Differences from proposal:~ all resolved
~"verify_volume" is now "verify_volumes_are_attached" + "verify_volumes_are_attached_per_node" + "verify_controller_attached_volume." Which of them do we want?~
~There is no "mount_device" metric because the MountVolume operation combines MountDevice and mount (plugin.Setup). Do we want to extract the mount_device metric or is it okay to keep mountvolume as one? For attachable volumes, MountDevice is the actual mount and Setup is a bindmount + setvolumeownership. For unattachable, mountDevice does not occur and Setup is an actual mount + setvolumeownership.~
~PV controller metrics I did not implement following the proposal at all. I did not change goroutinemap nor scheduleOperation. Because provisionClaimOperation does not return an error, so it's impossible for the caller to know if there is actually a failure worth reporting. So I manually create a new metric inside the function according to some conditions.~
@gnufied
I have tested the operationexecutor metrics but not provision & delete. Sample:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add error count and time-taken metrics for storage operations such as mount and attach, per-volume-plugin.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
Prepare VolumeHost for running mount tools in containers
This is the first part of implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/278 - running mount utilities in containers.
It updates `VolumeHost` interface:
* `GetMounter()` now requires volume plugin name, as it is going to return different mounter to different volume plugings, because mount utilities for these plugins can be on different places.
* New `GetExec()` method that should volume plugins use to execute any utilities. This new `Exec` interface will execute them on proper place.
* `SafeFormatAndMount` is updated to the new `Exec` interface.
This is just a preparation, `GetExec` right now leads to simple `os.Exec` and mount utilities are executed on the same place as before. Also, the volume plugins will be updated in subsequent PRs (split into separate PRs, some plugins required lot of changes).
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
@rootfs @gnufied
We want relatively short resync period of PV/PVCs and at the same time we
don't want to force such short resync to all shared informer consumers.
Therefore we need to make our own periodic resync.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46076, 43879, 44897, 46556, 46654)
Local storage plugin
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Volume plugin implementation for local persistent volumes. Scheduler predicate will direct already-bound PVCs to the node that the local PV is at. PVC binding still happens independently.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Part of #43640
**Release note**:
```
Alpha feature: Local volume plugin allows local directories to be created and consumed as a Persistent Volume. These volumes have node affinity and pods will only be scheduled to the node that the volume is at.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alphaProvisioner in PVController and AlphaStorageClassAnnotation
remove alpha annotation and alphaProvisioner
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improve event msg for PV controller when using external provisioner
Improve event msg for PV controller when using external provisioner
**Which issue this PR fixes** *:
Fixed part of #42121
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@jsafrane, as many of our users are confused by the original message, can we fix the message first and then consider how to control the count of the events?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41775, 39678, 42629, 42524, 43028)
matchPredicate does not fit findByClaim()
matchPredicate has two args which are type of PV,and is not used in function findByClaim(),remove it
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
check if the volume requested by the claim satisfies the requirements of the claim before binding when
syncUnboundClaim and claim.Spec.VolumeName is not set
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make Constants Public so that They Can Be Used in an Ext. Provisioner
Out-of-tree external provisioners have the same purpose as in-tree provisioners. As external provisioners work with PV and PVC datastructures it's an advantage to import certain Kubernetes packages instead of copy-pasting the Kubernetes code.
That's why the constants are made public so that they can be used in an external provisioner.
@jsafrane @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix createProvisionedPV result err judgenment bug
When ctrl.kubeClient.Core().PersistentVolumes().Create(volume) returns no err, and storeVolumeUpdate() fails, we save PV sucessfully ,but here err is not nil,we should not run the codes next in block if err != nil {} to delete the storage asset.
same in the deletion retries below
change the err names to make it clear
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@jsafrane @saad-ali PTAL. Thanks
When ctrl.kubeClient.Core().PersistentVolumes().Create(volume) returns no err, but storeVolumeUpdate() failed, we save PV sucessfully ,but here err is not nil,
we should not run the codes next in block if err != nil {}
same in the deletion retries below
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42522, 42545, 42556, 42006, 42631)
optimize the binding logic of bindClaimToVolume
extract var shouldSetBoundByController and do not need to judge volumename twice
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Out-of-tree external provisioners have the same purpose as in-tree provisioners. As external provisioners work with PV and PVC datastructures it's an advantage to import certain Kubernetes packages instead of copy-pasting the Kubernetes code.
That's why the constants are made public so that they can be used in an external provisioner.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41306, 42187, 41666, 42275, 42266)
Implement bulk polling of volumes
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
cc @justinsb
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
pv_controller: Do not report exponential backoff as error.
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
This just pollutes logs without any useful information:
```
E0214 08:00:30.428073 77288 pv_controller.go:1410] error scheduling operaion "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]": Failed to create operation with name "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]". An operation with that name failed at 2017-02-14 08:00:15.631133152 -0500 EST. No retries permitted until 2017-02-14 08:00:31.631133152 -0500 EST (16s). Last error: "Cannot delete the volume \"11a4faea-bfc7-4713-88b3-dec492480dba\", it's still attached to a node".
```
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41364, 40317, 41326, 41783, 41782)
changes to cleanup the volume plugin for recycle
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Code cleanup. Changing from creating a new interface from the plugin, that then calls a function to recycle a volume, to adding the function to the plugin itself.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#26230
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Took same approach from closed PR #28432.
Do you want the approach to be the same for NewDeleter(), NewMounter(), NewUnMounter() and should they be in this same PR or submit different PR's for those?
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alpha provisioning
This is the first part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/36
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
**Release note**:
```release-note
Alpha version of dynamic volume provisioning is removed in this release. Annotation
"volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class" does not have any special meaning. A default storage class
and DefaultStorageClass admission plugin can be used to preserve similar behavior of Kubernetes cluster,
see https://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/persistent-volumes/#class-1 for details.
```
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39064, 40294)
Refactor persistent volume tests
This is an attempt to make the binder tests a bit more concise. The PVCs are being created by a "templating" function. There is also a handful of PVs in the tests but those vary quite more and I don't think similar approach would save us much code.
Reference:
https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29006#-KPJuVeDE0O6TvDP9jia
@jsafrane: I hope this is what you have on mind.
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
Exponential back off when volume delete fails
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements ability in pv_controller to back off when deleting a volume fails from plugin API.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Partly fixes#38295 , but I think volume delete is most problematic thing happening in pv_controller without any sort of backoff.
After this change the attempts of volume deletion look like:
```
controller : I1208 00:18:35.532061 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:20:50.578325 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:23:05.563488 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:25:20.599158 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:27:35.560009 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:29:50.594967 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:32:05.539168 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:34:20.581665 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
```
This implements pv_controller to exponentially backoff
when deleting a volume fails in Cloud API. It ensures that
we aren't making too many calls to Cloud API
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37608, 37103, 37320, 37607, 37678)
Fix issue #37377: Report an event on successful PVC provisioning
This is a simple patch to fix the issue #37377: On a successful PVC provisioning an event is emitted so it's clear the provisioning actually succeeded.
cc: @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement external provisioning proposal
In other words, add "provisioned-by" annotation to all PVCs that should be provisioned dynamically.
Most of the changes are actually in tests.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Gluster provisioner is interested in pvc.Namespace and I don't want to add
at as a new field in VolumeOptions - it would contain almost whole PVC.
Let's pass direct reference to PVC instead and let the provisioner to pick
information it is interested in.
persistentvolumecontroller.NewPersistentVolumeController has 11 arguments now,
put them into a structure.
Also, rename NewPersistentVolumeController to NewController, persistentvolume
is already name of the package.
Fixes#30219
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Do not report error when deleting an attached volume
Persistent volume controller should not send warning events to a PV and mark the PV as failed when the volume is still attached.
This happens when a user quickly deletes a pod and associated PVC - PV is slowly detaching, while the PVC is already deleted and the PV enters Failed phase.
`Deleter.Deleter` can now return `tryAgainError`, which is sent as INFO to the PV to let the user know we did not forget to delete the PV, however the PV stays in Released state. The controller tries again in the next sync (15 seconds by default).
Fixes#31511
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Send recycle events from pod to pv.
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately when they finish.
e.g, `kubectl describe pv` could show that NFS cannot be mounted (and how many pods have tried it):
```
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
```
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table (too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
When Kubernetes does not have a plugin to delete a PV it should wait for
either external deleter or storage admin to delete the volume instead of
throwing an error.
Related to #32077
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use PV shared informer in PV controller
Use the PV shared informer, addressing (partially) https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26247 . Using the PVC shared informer is not so simple because sometimes the controller wants to `Requeue` and...
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are
started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately
when they finish.
kubectl describe pods will show:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table
(too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
with StorageClass.Provisioner == <unknown plugin>, we should wait for
either external provisioner or volume admin to provide a PV for a claim
instead of reporting an error.
Fixes#31723
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Don't bind pre-bound pvc & pv if size request not satisfied
as discussed briefly here https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30522 , volume size ought to be verified before binding a pv & pvc regardless of what's in the pv's claimRef. @thockin
Currently kubelet volume management works on the concept of desired
and actual world of states. The volume manager periodically compares the
two worlds and perform volume mount/unmount and/or attach/detach
operations. When kubelet restarts, the cache of those two worlds are
gone. Although desired world can be recovered through apiserver, actual
world can not be recovered which may cause some volumes cannot be cleaned
up if their information is deleted by apiserver. This change adds the
reconstruction of the actual world by reading the pod directories from
disk. The reconstructed volume information is added to both desired
world and actual world if it cannot be found in either world. The rest
logic would be as same as before, desired world populator may clean up
the volume entry if it is no longer in apiserver, and then volume
manager should invoke unmount to clean it up.
