The messages for container lifecycle events are subtly inconsistent
and should be unified.
First, the field format for containers is hard to parse for a human,
so include the container name directly in the message for create
and start, and for kill remove the container runtime prefix.
Second, the pulling image event has inconsistent capitalization, fix
that to be sentence without punctuation.
Third, the kill container event was unnecessarily wordy and inconsistent
with the create and start events. Make the following changes:
* Use 'Stopping' instead of 'Killing' since kill is usually reserved for
when we decide to hard stop a container
* Send the event before we dispatch the prestop hook, since this is an
"in-progress" style event vs a "already completed" type event
* Remove the 'cri-o://' / 'docker://' prefix by printing the container
name instead of id (we already do that replacement at the lower level
to prevent high cardinality events)
* Use 'message' instead of 'reason' as the argument name since this is a
string for humans field, not a string for machines field
* Remove the hash values on the container spec changed event because no
human will ever be able to do anything with the hash value
* Use 'Stopping container %s(, explanation)?' form without periods to
follow event conventions
The end result is a more pleasant message for humans:
```
35m Normal Created Pod Created container
35m Normal Started Pod Started container
10m Normal Killing Pod Killing container cri-o://installer:Need to kill Pod
10m Normal Pulling Pod pulling image "registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/openshift/origin-v4.0-2019-02-10-172026@sha256:3da5303d4384d24691721c1cf2333584ba60e8f82c9e782f593623ce8f83ddc5"
```
becomes
```
35m Normal Created Pod Created container installer
35m Normal Started Pod Started container installer
10m Normal Killing Pod Stopping container installer
10m Normal Pulling Pod Pulling image "registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/openshift/origin-v4.0-2019-02-10-172026@sha256:3da5303d4384d24691721c1cf2333584ba60e8f82c9e782f593623ce8f83ddc5"
```
- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
This patch fixes a regression introduced by
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/51751 in the CRI
interface.
That commit actually changed a unit test where we were previously *not*
assuming anything about an image name.
Before that commit, if you send the image "busybox" through the CRI,
the container runtime receives "busybox". After that patch the
container runtime gets "docker.io/library/busybox".
While that may be correct for the internal kube dockershim, in the CRI
we must not assume anything about image names. The ImageSpec is not
providing any spec around the image so the container runtime should
just get the raw image name from the pod spec. Every container runtime
can handle image names the way it wants. The "docker.io" namespace is
not at all "standard", CRI-O is not following what the docker UI say
since that's the docker UI. We should not focus the CRI on wrong UI
design, especially around a default namespace.
ImageSpec is not standardized yet:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46255 and
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/7203
This is something which should land in 1.9 as well since the regression
is from 1.8.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Murdaca <runcom@redhat.com>
This allows runtimes in different packages (dockertools, rkt, kuberuntime) to
share the same logic. Before this change, only dockertools support this
feature. Now all three packages support image pull throttling.
