HandleFlags() was used at e2e package and it depends on sub e2e
framework "config" in core e2e framework. That was invalid dependency.
So this moves HandleFlags() to e2e package for simple dependency.
Tests should never directly add to the global command line, because
some users of the tests might not want them there. For example,
options might only get set directly from a config file.
To achieve that, e2e/framework/config, e2e/framework/viperconfig, and
e2e/framework/test_context.go avoid using the global flag set and
instead expect to be told by the caller which flag set to use. Tests
that called flag directly either get updated or obsolete flags get
removed.
The exception is framework.HandleFlags, which as before directly
implements global command line handling.
This is a breaking change for test suites which do not use that
function (and only those): they now need to ensure that they copy
individual flags from tests. Because the RegisterCommonFlags prototype
has changed, test suite authors will notice due to the resulting
compilation errors.
It is useful to apply the storage testsuite also to "external" (=
out-of-tree) storage drivers. One way of doing that is setting up a
custom E2E test suite, but that's still quite a bit of work.
An easier alternative is to parameterize the Kubernetes e2e.test
binary at runtime so that it instantiates the testsuite for one or
more drivers. Some parameters have to be provided before starting the
test because they define configuration and capabilities of the driver
and its storage backend that cannot be discovered at runtime. This is
done by populating the DriverDefinition with the content of the file
that the new -storage.testdriver parameters points to.
The universal .yaml and .json decoder from Kubernetes is used. It's
flexible, but has some downsides:
- currently ignores unknown fields (see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/71589)
- poor error messages when fields have the wrong type
Storage drivers have to be installed in the test cluster before
starting e2e.test. Only tests involving dynamically provisioned
volumes are currently supported.
When running ginkgo directly against the source code of the test suite
instead of using some pre-compiled e2e.test binary, ginkgo no longer
recognized that it runs a Ginkgo testsuite, which broke "-focus" and
"-p".
By re-inserting the magic strings that ginkgo looks for into a
comment, we can restore the desired behavior without affecting the
code.
Fixes: #74827
Storing settings in the framework's TestContext is not something that
out-of-tree test authors can do because for them the framework is a
read-only upstream component. Conceptually the same is true for
in-tree tests, so the recommended approach is to define configuration
settings in the code that uses them.
How to do that is a bit uncertain. Viper has several
drawbacks (maintenance status uncertain, cannot list supported
options, cannot validate the configuration file). How to handle
configuration files is currently getting discussed for kubeadm, with
similar concerns about
Viper (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/1040).
Instead of making a choice now for E2E, the recommendation is that
test authors continue to define command line flags as before, except
that they should do it in their own code and with better flag names.
But the ability to read options also from a file is useful, so
several enhancements get added:
- all settings defined via flags can also be read from a
configuration file, without extra work for test authors
- framework/config makes it possible to populate a struct directly
and define flags with a single function call
- a path and file suffix can be given to --viper-config (as in
"--viper-config /tmp/e2e.json") instead of expecting the file in
the current directory; as before, just plain "--viper-config e2e"
still works
- if "--viper-config" is set, the file must exist; otherwise the
"e2e" config is optional (as before)
- errors from Viper are no longer silently ignored, so syntax errors
are detected early
- Viper support is optional: test suite authors who don't want
it are not forced to use it by the e2e/framework
The new test/e2e/framework/testfiles package makes it possible to
write tests that do not depend on a specific way of providing
additional test files at runtime. Such tests and the framework are
then more easily reused in other test suites.
In the test/e2e suite file access is enabled based on the existing
"repo-root" command line parameter and the built-in bindata. Tests
using the new API will first check for files under "repo-root" and
then fall back to the builtin data. This way, users of a test binary
can modify those files without having to rebuild the binary.
"repo-root" is still needed because at least some tests check for
additional files (secret.yaml, via ingress_utils.go) that are not part
of the upstream source code and thus may or may not be built into a
test binary.
Tests using bindata or repo-root directly get modified to use the new
API, or removed when they are obsolete: test/e2e/examples.go depended
on files that were removed in
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/61246 and thus can no
longer be run in Kubernetes. Moving the tests to kubernetes/examples
is tracked in https://github.com/kubernetes/examples/issues/214.
The file removal did not break the automated E2E testing probably
because the tests are under the Feature:Example tag and thus not
enabled during normal CI runs.
Removing also the obsolete tests makes it simpler to rework the
"repo-root" setting because less code uses it.
Related-to: #66649 and #23987
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52768, 51898, 53510, 53097, 53058). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
migration of federation test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Migrate federation(multicluster) e2e test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Ref Umbrella issue #49161
Ref issue https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/50735
- Move `ubernetes_lite.go` to new created directory named **multicluster**.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
none
/cc @quinton-hoole
**What this PR does / why we need it:** This PR adds [sig-auth] prefix to
workload e2e tests in accord to requirements of adding a SIG dashboard
to testgrid. Refer PR #48781 for guidelines.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49871, 49422, 49092, 49858, 48999)
Refactor logging e2e tests, add new checks
I split existing code into smaller files to simplify the review and future changes
Also, there are new tests for stackdriver logging:
- ingesting system logs from all nodes
- ingesting logs in json format
- ingesting logs in glog format
Add support for creating resources that are not immediately visible to
naive clients, but must first be initialized by one or more privileged
cluster agents. These controllers can mark the object as initialized,
allowing others to see them.
Permission to override initialization defaults or modify an initializing
object is limited per resource to a virtual subresource "RESOURCE/initialize"
via RBAC.
Initialization is currently alpha.
The TestE2E function is run on every Ginkgo parallel node.
The cluster cleanup, sanity checking, and log dump operations are only
intended to be called once, however, so these have been moved out into
SynchronizedBeforeSuite and SynchronizedAfterSuite blocks.
We adapt the existing code to work across all zones in a region.
We require a feature-flag to enable Ubernetes-Lite
Reasons:
* There are some behavioural changes if users create volumes with
the same name in two zones.
* We don't want to make one API call per zone if we're not running
Ubernetes-Lite.
* Ubernetes-Lite is still experimental.
There isn't a parallel flag implemented for AWS, because at the moment
there would be no behaviour changes from this.
