If not, using `go test -count=n` would make them pile up and ultimately
get to the limit of open files:
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:39768: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 5ms
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:46606: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 5ms
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:46606: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 10ms
2015/12/05 12:43:56 http: Accept error: accept tcp 127.0.0.1:46606: accept4: too many open files; retrying in 20ms
Steps to reproduce (no longer fails):
godep go test -short -run '^$' -o test .
./test -test.run '^TestDoRequestNewWayFile$' -test.count 100
Note that this might not fail if your `ulimit -n` is not low enough.
For AWS EBS, a volume can only be attached to a node in the same AZ.
The scheduler must therefore detect if a volume is being attached to a
pod, and ensure that the pod is scheduled on a node in the same AZ as
the volume.
So that the scheduler need not query the cloud provider every time, and
to support decoupled operation (e.g. bare metal) we tag the volume with
our placement labels. This is done automatically by means of an
admission controller on AWS when a PersistentVolume is created backed by
an EBS volume.
Support for tagging GCE PVs will follow.
Pods that specify a volume directly (i.e. without using a
PersistentVolumeClaim) will not currently be scheduled correctly (i.e.
they will be scheduled without zone-awareness).
Skip updating resources that already meet the desired replica count.
This change has an impact in both kubectl scale and kubectl delete in
that reapable resources that already have the desired replicas (number
provided via --replicas for scale, or zero for delete) won't be updated
again and a "already scaled" message will be printed (in case of scale).
Refactor Kubelet's server functionality into a server package. Most
notably, move pkg/kubelet/server.go into
pkg/kubelet/server/server.go. This will lead to better separation of
concerns and a more readable code hierarchy.
