Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use indirect streaming path for remote CRI shim
Last step for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/29579
- Wire through the remote indirect streaming methods in the docker remote shim
- Add the docker streaming server as a handler at `<node>:10250/cri/{exec,attach,portforward}`
- Disable legacy streaming for dockershim
Note: This requires PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/34987 to work.
Tested manually on an E2E cluster.
/cc @euank @feiskyer @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
support kubectl apply --force
Support `kubectl apply --force` which is first delete the resource and then re-apply the resource, when the patch fails.
Fixes: #16569
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Better messaging for missing volume binaries on host
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When mount binaries are not present on a host, the error returned is a generic one.
This change is to check the mount binaries before the mount and return a user-friendly error message.
This change is specific to GCI and the flag is experimental now.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36098
**Release note**:
Introduces a flag `check-node-capabilities-before-mount` which if set, enables a check (`CanMount()`) prior to mount operations to verify that the required components (binaries, etc.) to mount the volume are available on the underlying node. If the check is enabled and `CanMount()` returns an error, the mount operation fails. Implements the `CanMount()` check for NFS.
Sample output post change :
rkouj@rkouj0:~/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes$ kubectl describe pods
Name: sleepyrc-fzhyl
Namespace: default
Node: e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa/10.240.0.3
Start Time: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:28:36 -0800
Labels: name=sleepy
Status: Pending
IP:
Controllers: ReplicationController/sleepyrc
Containers:
sleepycontainer1:
Container ID:
Image: gcr.io/google_containers/busybox
Image ID:
Port:
Command:
sleep
6000
QoS Tier:
cpu: Burstable
memory: BestEffort
Requests:
cpu: 100m
State: Waiting
Reason: ContainerCreating
Ready: False
Restart Count: 0
Environment Variables:
Conditions:
Type Status
Initialized True
Ready False
PodScheduled True
Volumes:
data:
Type: NFS (an NFS mount that lasts the lifetime of a pod)
Server: 127.0.0.1
Path: /export
ReadOnly: false
default-token-d13tj:
Type: Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
SecretName: default-token-d13tj
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
7s 7s 1 {default-scheduler } Normal Scheduled Successfully assigned sleepyrc-fzhyl to e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa
6s 3s 4 {kubelet e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa} Warning FailedMount Unable to mount volume kubernetes.io/nfs/32c7ef16-a574-11e6-813d-42010af00002-data (spec.Name: data) on pod sleepyrc-fzhyl (UID: 32c7ef16-a574-11e6-813d-42010af00002). Verify that your node machine has the required components before attempting to mount this volume type. Required binary /sbin/mount.nfs is missing
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement external provisioning proposal
In other words, add "provisioned-by" annotation to all PVCs that should be provisioned dynamically.
Most of the changes are actually in tests.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use generation in pod disruption budget
Fixes#35324
Previously it was possible to use allowedDirsruptions calculated for the previous spec with the current spec. With generation check API servers always make sure that allowedDisruptions were calculated for the current spec.
At the same time I set the registry policy to only accept updates if the version based on which the update was made matches to the current version in etcd. That ensures that parallel eviction executions don't use the same allowed disruption.
cc: @davidopp @kargakis @wojtek-t
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use available informers in quota replenishment
more iteration on the goal to use informers where available in quota system. this time adding persistent volume claims so the same informer is used here and https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36316
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix default Seccomp profile directory
Looks like some of the refactoring caused us to lose the default
directory. Setting that explicitly here.
Fixes#36350
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Cleanup kubelet eviction manager tests
It cleans up kubelet eviction manager tests
Extracted parts of tests that were similar to each other to functions
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add Windows support to kube-proxy
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is the first stab at supporting kube-proxy (userspace mode) on Windows
**Which issue this PR fixes** :
fixes#30278
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The MVP uses `netsh portproxy` to redirect traffic from `ServiceIP:ServicePort` to a `LocalIP:LocalPort`.
For the next version we are expecting to have guidance from Microsoft Container Networking team.
**Limitations**:
Current implementation does not support DNS queries over UDP as `netsh portproxy` currently only supports TCP. We are working with Microsoft to remediate this.
cc: @brendandburns @dcbw
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add tests for deepcopy of structs
Until https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35728 merges, we want to at least fuzz/test that deepcopy isn't shallow-copying problematic fields
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Support persistent volume usage for kubernetes running on Photon Controller platform
**What this PR does / why we need it:**
Enable the persistent volume usage for kubernetes running on Photon platform.
Photon Controller: https://vmware.github.io/photon-controller/
_Only the first commit include the real code change.
The following commits are for third-party vendor dependency and auto-generated code/docs updating._
Two components are added:
pkg/cloudprovider/providers/photon: support Photon Controller as cloud provider
pkg/volume/photon_pd: support Photon persistent disk as volume source for persistent volume
Usage introduction:
a. Photon Controller is supported as cloud provider.
When choosing to use photon controller as a cloud provider, "--cloud-provider=photon --cloud-config=[path_to_config_file]" is required for kubelet/kube-controller-manager/kube-apiserver. The config file of Photon Controller should follow the following usage:
```
[Global]
target = http://[photon_controller_endpoint_IP]
ignoreCertificate = true
tenant = [tenant_name]
project = [project_name]
overrideIP = true
```
b. Photon persistent disk is supported as volume source/persistent volume source.
yaml usage:
```
volumes:
- name: photon-storage-1
photonPersistentDisk:
pdID: "643ed4e2-3fcc-482b-96d0-12ff6cab2a69"
```
pdID is the persistent disk ID from Photon Controller.
c. Enable Photon Controller as volume provisioner.
yaml usage:
```
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1beta1
metadata:
name: gold_sc
provisioner: kubernetes.io/photon-pd
parameters:
flavor: persistent-disk-gold
```
The flavor "persistent-disk-gold" needs to be created by Photon platform admin before hand.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
cloudprovider/cloudstack: Fix a bug where we assume IP addresses instead of a hostnames
Because of how our test environment was setup, we didn’t notice that we were assuming the load balancer hosts list to always be IP addresses, while they actually are hostnames.
So without this PR, the load balancer code will not work as expected as it will not be able to find the nodes that need to be load balanced.
Also updated some comments and added a check to prevent trying to release a public IP if we don’t have one.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make GCI nodes mount non tmpfs, ext* & bind mounts using an external mounter
This PR downloads the stage1 & gci-mounter ACIs as part of cluster bring up instead of downloading them dynamically from gcr.io, which was the cause for #36206.
I have also optimized the containerized mounter to pre-load the mounter image once to avoid fetch latency while using it.
Original PR which got reverted: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35821
```release-note
GCI nodes use an external mounter script to mount NFS & GlusterFS storage volumes
```
@mtaufen Node e2e is not re-enabled in this PR.
cc @jingxu97
Automatic merge from submit-queue
specify custom ca file to verify the keystone server
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Sometimes the keystone server's certificate is self-signed, mainly used for internal development, testing and etc.
For this kind of ca, we need a way to verify the keystone server.
Otherwise, below error will occur.
> x509: certificate signed by unknown authority
This patch provide a way to pass in a ca file to verify the keystone server when starting `kube-apiserver`.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#22695, #24984
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
``` release-note
```
Provides an opt-in flag, --experimental-fail-swap-on (and corresponding
KubeletConfiguration value, ExperimentalFailSwapOn), which is false by default.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Deprecate extensions/v1beta1.Jobs related stuff
This PR supersedes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33861, it's a pre-req for removing `extensions/v1beta1.Jobs` (#32763) in the next release.
@kubernetes/kubectl @kubernetes/api-review-team ptal
@bgrant0607 @erictune @janetkuo fyi
```release-note
Deprecate extensions/v1beta1.Jobs
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make a consistent name ( GlusterFS instead of Gluster) in variables a…
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal hchiramm@redhat.com
Automatic merge from submit-queue
HPA: Consider unready pods separately
**Release note**:
``` release-note
The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler now takes the readiness of pods into account when calculating desired replicas.
```
Currently, the HPA considers unready pods the same as ready pods when
looking at their CPU and custom metric usage. However, pods frequently
use extra CPU during initialization, so we want to consider them
separately.
This commit causes the HPA to consider unready pods as having 0 CPU
usage when scaling up, and ignores them when scaling down. If, when
scaling up, factoring the unready pods as having 0 CPU would cause a
downscale instead, we simply choose not to scale. Otherwise, we simply
scale up at the reduced amount calculated by factoring the pods in at
zero CPU usage.
Similarly, if we are missing metrics for any pods, those pods will be
considered as having 0% CPU when scaling up, and 100% CPU when
scaling down. As with the unready pods calculation, this cannot change
the direction of the scale.
The effect is that unready pods cause the autoscaler to be a bit more
conservative -- large increases in CPU usage can still cause scales,
even with unready pods in the mix, but will not cause the scale factors
to be as large, in anticipation of the new pods later becoming ready and
handling load.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
options, kube-apiserver: clarify scheme on etcd endpoints
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix typo in `kube-apiserver` flag.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
None
