Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Split KUBE-SERVICES chain to re-shrink the INPUT chain
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
#43972 added an iptables rule "`-A INPUT -j KUBE-SERVICES`" to make NodePort ICMP rejection work. (Previously the KUBE-SERVICES chain was only run from OUTPUT, not INPUT.) #44547 extended that patch for ExternalIP rejection as well.
However, the KUBE-SERVICES chain may potentially have a very large number of ICMP reject rules for plain ClusterIP services (the ones that get run from OUTPUT), and it seems that for some reason the kernel is much more sensitive to the length of the INPUT chain than it is to the length of the OUTPUT chain. So a node that worked fine with kube 1.6 (when KUBE-SERVICES was only run from OUTPUT) might fall over with kube 1.7 (with KUBE-SERVICES being run from both INPUT and OUTPUT).
(Specifically, a node with about 5000 ClusterIP reject rules that ran fine with OpenShift 3.6 [kube 1.6] slowed almost to a complete halt with OpenShift 3.7 [kube 1.7].)
This PR fixes things by splitting out the "new" part of KUBE-SERVICES (NodePort and ExternalIP reject rules) into a separate KUBE-EXTERNAL-SERVICES chain run from INPUT, and moves KUBE-SERVICES back to being only run from OUTPUT. (So, yes, this assumes that you don't have 5000 NodePort/ExternalIP services, but, if you do, there's not much we can do, since those rules *have* to be run on the INPUT side.)
Oh, and I left in the code to clean up the "`-A INPUT -j KUBE-SERVICES`" rule even though we don't generate it any more, so it gets fixed on upgrade.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Reorganized iptables rules to fix a performance regression on clusters with thousands of services.
```
@kubernetes/sig-network-bugs @kubernetes/rh-networking
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55988, 53555, 55858). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add IPv6 and negative UT test cases for proxier's deleteEndpointConnections
This change adds IPv6 and negative UT test cases for the proxier's deleteEndpointConnections.
Changes include:
- Add IPv6 UT test cases to TestDeleteEndpointConnections.
- Add negative UT test case to TestDeleteEndpointConnections for
handling case where no connections need clearing (benign error).
- Add negative UT test case to test unexpected error.
- Reorganize UT in TestDeleteEndpointConnections so that the fake
command executor's command and scripted responses are generated on
the fly based on the test case table (rather than using a fixed
set of commands/responses that will need to be updated every time
test cases are added/deleted).
- Create the proxier service map in real time, based on the test case
table (rather than using a fixed service map that will need to be updated
every time test cases are added/deleted).
fixes#53554
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This change adds IPv6 and negative UT test cases for the proxier's
deleteEndpointConnections.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#53554
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55009, 55532, 55601, 52569, 55533). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix ipvs/proxy getLocalIPs inconsistency with iptables/proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* Fix ipvs/proxy `getLocalIPs()` inconsistency with iptables/proxy
* validate the ip address before pkg/proxy/util IPPart() return ip string.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** :
Fixes#55612
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53580, 55568). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Replace sets.List() with sets.UnsortedList() in pkg/proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Replace sets.List() with sets.UnsortedList() in pkg/proxy - sets.List() will sort the result array, we don't need sorted array in pkg/proxy. Using sets.UnsortedList() can reduce the unnecessary overhead spending.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@wojtek-t wdyt ^_^
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig network
This change adds IPv6 and negative UT test cases for the proxier's
deleteEndpointConnections.
Changes include:
- Add IPv6 UT test cases to TestDeleteEndpointConnections.
- Add negative UT test case to TestDeleteEndpointConnections for
handling case where no connections need clearing (benign error).
- Add negative UT test case to test unexpected error.
- Reorganize UT in TestDeleteEndpointConnections so that the fake
command executor's command and scripted responses are generated on
the fly based on the test case table (rather than using a fixed
set of commands/responses that will need to be updated every time
test cases are added/deleted).
- Create the proxier service map in real time, based on the test case
table (rather than using a fixed service map that will need to be updated
every time test cases are added/deleted).
fixes#53554
The following changes are proposed for the iptables proxier:
* There are three places where a string specifying IP:port is parsed
using something like this:
if index := strings.Index(e.endpoint, ":"); index != -1 {
This will fail for IPv6 since V6 addresses contain colons. Also,
the V6 address is expected to be surrounded by square brackets
(i.e. []:). Fix this by replacing call to Index with
call to LastIndex() and stripping out square brackets.
* The String() method for the localPort struct should put square brackets
around IPv6 addresses.
* The logging in the merge() method for proxyServiceMap should put brackets
around IPv6 addresses.
* There are several places where filterRules destination is hardcoded to
/32. This should be a /128 for IPv6 case.
* Add IPv6 unit test cases
fixes#48550
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49850, 47782, 50595, 50730, 51341)
Paramaterize `stickyMaxAgeMinutes` for service in API
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Currently I find `stickyMaxAgeMinutes` for a session affinity type service is hard code to 180min. There is a TODO comment, see
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier.go#L205
I think the seesion sticky max time varies from service to service and users may not aware of it since it's hard coded in all proxier.go - iptables, userspace and winuserspace.
Once we parameterize it in API, users can set/get the values for their different services.
Perhaps, we can introduce a new field `api.ClientIPAffinityConfig` in `api.ServiceSpec`.
There is an initial discussion about it in sig-network group. See,
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-sig-network/i-LkeHrjs80
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#49831
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Paramaterize session affinity timeout seconds in service API for Client IP based session affinity.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Edge-based userspace LB in kube-proxy
@thockin @bowei - if one of you could take a look if that PR doesn't break some basic kube-proxy assumptions. The similar change for winuserproxy should be pretty trivial.
And we should also do that for iptables, but that requires splitting the iptables code to syncProxyRules (which from what I know @thockin already started working on so we should probably wait for it to be done).
