Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59052, 59157, 59428, 59949, 60151). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e ingress-gce] Reduce numExtraLarge to 99
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
From https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-ingress-gce-e2e-scale/47, the lastest scale test failed because we are hitting quota limit --- we are creating 101 ingresses while we only have quota for 100.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @rramkumar1
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58716, 59977, 59316, 59884, 60117). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove deprecated /proxy paths
These were deprecated in v1.2.
ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/59885
```release-note
kube-apiserver: the root /proxy paths have been removed (deprecated since v1.2). Use the /proxy subresources on objects that support HTTP proxying.
```
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-api-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix all the typos across the project
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are lots of typos across the project. We should avoid small PRs on fixing those annoying typos, which is time-consuming and low efficient.
This PR does fix all the typos across the project currently. And with #59463, typos could be avoided when a new PR gets merged.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig testing
/area test-infra
/sig release
/cc @ixdy
/assign @fejta
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e ingress-gce] Retrieve the correct health check resource
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Previously the test retrieves a random health check resource and assumes it belongs to the test ingress, which is wrong when multiple ingress tests are running simultaneously.
Example failure: https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-ingress-gce-e2e/533
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @rramkumar1 @nicksardo
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add gce-ingress e2e test for sync failure case
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add a test that verifies sync failures on some inrgesses would not stop gce ingress controller from syncing others.
Basically:
- Create two ingresses each has something wrong (TLS missing, backend missing etc.).
- Create a normal ingress and test it works.
- Update this ingress and test it takes effect.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Ref https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E2ufxZGujFCYKYOsvBjb4VMNjBy8CM-MMycoT_UVwIs/edit#heading=h.wxzdzliw64t8.
/assign @rramkumar1 @nicksardo
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e util] Remove static IP functions based on gcloud
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Use GCE library for static IP instead of calling gcloud in e2e test.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
note that we don't change the behaviour of kubectl.
For example it won't scale new resources. That's the end goal.
The first step is to retrofit existing code to use the generic scaler.
utils/image/manifest has an additional `arch` parameter, which determines
whether an image ends in `-$ARCH` (like `-amd64`).
All locations that previously had gcr.io urls referenced in costants or inline
have been updated to refere test/utils/image.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 56250, 56809, 56812, 56792, 56724). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Hit ILB endpoint in e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
During the ILB e2e networking test, a pod is created and curls the ILB's IP address, validating that the load balancer correctly routes traffic to the K8s service. Test will also hit the external LB endpoint after switching from ILB->ELB, validating no GCE conversion issues going from ILB to ELB.
This does not validate that the load balancer is accessible externally to the cluster (but on the same network).
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54604, 55781, 55806, 55935, 55991). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use core client with explicit version
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Core client without explicit version has been deprecated, change them to the one with explicit version.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes partially #55993
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/cc @caesarxuchao @k82cn @sttts @kevin-wangzefeng
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52748, 56623). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add brackets around IPv6 addrs in e2e test IP:port endpoints
There are several locations in the e2e tests where endpoints of the
form IPv6:port use IPv6 addresses directly, without surrounding brackets.
Brackets are required around IPv6 addresses in this case, in order to
distinguish the colons in the IPv6 address from the colon immediately
preceding the port.
Also, wherever the curl command might be used with an IPv6 address
surrounded in brackets, the "-g" argument is added to the curl
command line arguments so that the brackets can be interpreted
correctly.
fixes#52746
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds brackets around IPv6 addresses when they appear as part of an IPv6-addr:port endpoint
in the e2e tests. This is needed because any connections that attempt to use IPv6-addr:port
endpoint without brackets surrounding the IPv6-addr will fail.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#52746
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
NetworkPolicy e2e: named port egress test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add an e2e NetworkPolicy test that ensures that an egress rule that specifies a named port properly applies to egress traffic.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#52040
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
There are several locations in the e2e tests where endpoints of the
form IP:port use IPv6 addresses directly, without surrounding brackets.
Brackets are required around IPv6 addresses in this case, in order to
distinguish the colons in the IPv6 address from the colon immediately
preceding the port.
Also, wherever the curl command might be used with an IPv6 address
surrounded in brackets, the "-g" argument is added to the curl
command line arguments so that the brackets can be interpreted
correctly.
fixes#52746
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54826, 53576, 55591, 54946, 54825). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add dns, configmap, and custom resource definition conformance
annotations.
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
Add dns, configmap, and custom resource definition related conformance annotations
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds pod related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the dns, configmap, and custom resource definition based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Check dup NodePort with protocols when update services
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As the title says.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48579fixes: #54898fixes: #55327
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @freehan
/cc @cblecker
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55114, 52976, 54871, 55122, 55140). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Don't share nodePort service in session affinity tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
From https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/54524, https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/54571.
Spent sometime to dig into it today, found this test is flaky mostly because it sends out service requests before kube-proxy reacts on the service session affinity update, hence multiple endpoints are responding instead of one. It is more flaky in alpha CIs probably due to different test sequences.
This PR creates a separate service with `sessionAffinity=ClientIP` so there wouldn't be a race between test begins and kube-proxy reacts. On the other hand, it also seems inappropriate to tweak the`config.NodePortService`, which is shared by other networking tests.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes # (will mark them fixed later).
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @m1093782566 @bowei
cc @spiffxp
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
