Automatic merge from submit-queue
Edge-based userspace LB in kube-proxy
@thockin @bowei - if one of you could take a look if that PR doesn't break some basic kube-proxy assumptions. The similar change for winuserproxy should be pretty trivial.
And we should also do that for iptables, but that requires splitting the iptables code to syncProxyRules (which from what I know @thockin already started working on so we should probably wait for it to be done).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Restore "Setting endpoints" log message
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The "Setting endpoints" message from kube-proxy at high verbosity was
lost as part of a larger simplification in kubernetes/kubernetes#42747.
This change brings it back, simply outputting the just-constructed
addresses list.
I need this message to monitor delays in propagating endpoints changes across nodes.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43871, 44053)
Proxy healthchecks overhaul
The first commit is #44051
These three commits are tightly coupled, but should be reviewed one-by-one. The first adds tests for healthchecks, and found a bug. The second basically rewrites the healthcheck pkg to be much simpler and less flexible (since we weren't using the flexibility). The third tweaks how healthchecks are handled in endpoints-path to be more like they are in services-path.
@MrHohn because I know you were in here for source-IP GA work.
@wojtek-t
The "Setting endpoints" message from kube-proxy at high verbosity was
lost as part of a larger simplification in kubernetes/kubernetes#42747.
This change brings it back, simply outputting the just-constructed
addresses list.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kube-proxy: filter INPUT as well as OUTPUT
We need to apply filter rules on the way in (nodeports) and out (cluster
IPs). Testing here is insufficient to have caught this - will come back
for that.
Fixes#43969
@justinsb since you have the best repro, can you test? It passes what I think is repro.
@ethernetdan we will want this in 1.6.x
```release-note
Fix bug with service nodeports that have no backends not being rejected, when they should be. This is not a regression vs v1.5 - it's a fix that didn't quite fix hard enough.
```
The existing healthcheck lib was pretty complicated and was hiding some
bugs (like the count always being 1), This is a reboot of the interface
and implementation to be significantly simpler and better tested.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use shared informers for proxy endpoints and service configs
Use shared informers instead of creating local controllers/reflectors
for the proxy's endpoints and service configs. This allows downstream
integrators to pass in preexisting shared informers to save on memory &
cpu usage.
This also enables the cache mutation detector for kube-proxy for those
presubmit jobs that already turn it on.
Follow-up to #43295 cc @wojtek-t
Will race with #43937 for conflicting changes 😄 cc @thockin
cc @smarterclayton @sttts @liggitt @deads2k @derekwaynecarr @eparis @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra
Adding test cases for HC updates found a bug with an update that
simultaneously removes one port and adds another. Map iteration is
randomized, so sometimes no HC would be created.
Use shared informers instead of creating local controllers/reflectors
for the proxy's endpoints and service configs. This allows downstream
integrators to pass in preexisting shared informers to save on memory &
cpu usage.
This also enables the cache mutation detector for kube-proxy for those
presubmit jobs that already turn it on.
We need to apply filter rules on the way in (nodeports) and out (cluster
IPs). Testing here is insufficient to have caught this - will come back
for that.
We don't need the svcPortToInfoMap. Its only purpose was to
send "valid" local endpoints (those with valid IP and >0 port) to the
health checker. But we shouldn't be sending invalid endpoints to
the health checker anyway, because it can't do anything with them.
If we exclude invalid endpoints earlier, then we don't need
flattenValidEndpoints().
And if we don't need flattenValidEndpoints() it makes no sense to have
svcPortToInfoMap store hostPortInfo, since endpointsInfo is the same
thing as hostPortInfo except with a combined host:port.
And if svcPortToInfoMap now only stores valid endpointsInfos, it is
exactly the same thing as newEndpoints.
