Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66850, 66902, 66779, 66864, 66912). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
update etcdstorage test to use discovery
1. update etcdstorage test to use discovery
2. switches to use the dynamic client
3. fixes the bug where the server wasn't a complete kube-apiserver
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @enj @sttts
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
@apelisse a discovery based example.
@yue9944882 you've expressed an interest. The wiring for the server is really hard to use here.
I've also noticed that this doesn't build an equivalent kube-apiserver, but that is proving troublesome. Will follow up with with.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66877, 66066, 66851). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Cleanup the Admission Webhook E2E code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The current documentation for Admission Webhooks points to the e2e tests as an example.
The code appears to have some legacy configuration left behind. The variables are confusingly named and it lacked comments developers could follow. This is an attempt to clean up some code and make the code more readable to make webhook development easier.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66846, 60552). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding details to Conformance Tests using RFC 2119 standards.
This PR is part of the conformance documentation. This is to provide more formal specification using RFC 2119 keywords to describe the test so that who ever is running conformance tests do not have to go through the code to understand why and what is tested.
The documentation information added here into each of the tests eventually result into a document which is currently checked in at location https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/blob/master/docs/KubeConformance-1.9.md
I would like to have this PR reviewed for v1.10 as I consider it important to strengthen the conformance documents.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64645, 66832). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Detect if GCE PD udev link is wrong and try to correct it
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
udev can miss scsi events and not update device links properly when disks are detached and reattached to the same node in a different order. This PR workarounds the issue by comparing the udev link name, which is the PD disk name, with the scsi disk serial number returned from scsi_id, and prevents mounting of the disk if the link is wrong. It will also run `udevadm trigger` on the disk to try to correct the bad link.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
This fix prevents a GCE PD volume from being mounted if the udev device link is stale and tries to correct the link.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65730, 66615, 66684, 66519, 66510). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
update attach to use external objs
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Updates attach command to use external versions.
cc @deads2k @soltysh
added comments and renamed some variables to make the code easier to understand
migrated to new image_util build system
improved tests
updated copyright headers to 2018
updated webhook version
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Part 1: Allowing volumes to choose when to use securityContext
This PR is the result of [splitting this PR]( https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65793) into 2 sections:
1) This part, addressing the refactor so eligible-test-for-conformance can use get rid of privileged security context.
2) a second part that will address the promotion of the testcases to be in conformance suite.
Changes:
a) demoted privileged mode for these tests (not needed)
b) regular tests (the other ones existing in the file) will still be using privileged security context.
b) adding privilegedSecurityContext field to VolInfo, so each volume-flavor can let the test know if the security context has to be privileged or not.
This allows granular changes and updates per volume).
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Switch to multi arch test/images with manifests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Recently we updated the test container images to use multi-arch fat manifests and pushed the new images to the `gcr.io/kubernetes-e2e-test-images` repository. In this changeset, we are switching to using the new images and cleaning up some of the unused image definitions from manifest.go. We are removing the folders corresponding to the unused images as well.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66626
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mkumatag
/cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
need ExpectNoError check
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
err need ExpectNoError check
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
update exit code to 0 if patch not needed
**Release note**:
```release-note
The `kubectl patch` command no longer exits with exit code 1 when a redundant patch results in a no-op
```
The specific logic in the `patch` command that exited with code 1, was only doing so when there was no diff between an existing object and its patched counterpart. (In case of errors, we just return those, which eventually ends up exiting with code 1 anyway). This patch removes this block, as we should not be treating patch no-ops as errors.
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/58212
cc @soltysh
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding details to Conformance Tests using RFC 2119 standards.
This PR is part of the conformance documentation. This is to provide more formal specification using RFC 2119 keywords to describe the test so that who ever is running conformance tests do not have to go through the code to understand why and what is tested.
The documentation information added here into each of the tests eventually result into a document which is currently checked in at location https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/blob/master/docs/KubeConformance-1.9.md
I would like to have this PR reviewed for v1.10 as I consider it important to strengthen the conformance documents.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
should get return err and check it
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
should get return err and check it
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66827, 60550). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding details to Conformance Tests using RFC 2119 standards.
This PR is part of the conformance documentation. This is to provide more formal specification using RFC 2119 keywords to describe the test so that who ever is running conformance tests do not have to go through the code to understand why and what is tested.
The documentation information added here into each of the tests eventually result into a document which is currently checked in at location https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/blob/master/docs/KubeConformance-1.9.md
I would like to have this PR reviewed for v1.10 as I consider it important to strengthen the conformance documents.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66827, 60550). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix expected pod creations/deletions estimate in load test
Fixing a wrongly computed expectation for first round of scaling in load test. Luckily as a side-effect, this should also speed up load test by:
- 25s on 100-node cluster
- 2m on 500-node cluster (so helps our presubmit - https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/8348)
- 20m on 5000-node cluster
That said, I'm not 100% sure if this won't start causing failures in practice.
/cc @gmarek @mborsz
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65570, 65616). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Retry scheduling on StorageClass events
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56163
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have taken over #60006.
It's hard to test in e2e, because we cannot know reschedule of pod is triggered by which event (periodically service/node events will move pods to active queue too). ~~I'll add integration tests for this functionality after [this PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65296) get merged.~~ (already added)
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66445, 66643, 60551). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding details to Conformance Tests using RFC 2119 standards.
This PR is part of the conformance documentation. This is to provide more formal specification using RFC 2119 keywords to describe the test so that who ever is running conformance tests do not have to go through the code to understand why and what is tested.
The documentation information added here into each of the tests eventually result into a document which is currently checked in at location https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/blob/master/docs/KubeConformance-1.9.md
I would like to have this PR reviewed for v1.10 as I consider it important to strengthen the conformance documents.
this PR is the result of splitting https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65793 into 2 sections
1) This part, addressing the refactor so eligible-test-for-conformance can use get rid of privileged security context.
2) a second part that will address the promotion of the testcases to be in conformance suite
Changes:
a) demoted privileged mode for these tests (not needed)
b) regular tests (the other ones existing in the file) will still be using privileged security context.
c) adding privilegedSecurityContext field to VolInfo, so each volume-flavor can let the test know if the security context has to be privileged or not.
This allows granular changes and updates per volume).
d) fixing formatting issue.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66270, 60554, 66816). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding details to Conformance Tests using RFC 2119 standards.
This PR is part of the conformance documentation. This is to provide more formal specification using RFC 2119 keywords to describe the test so that who ever is running conformance tests do not have to go through the code to understand why and what is tested.
The documentation information added here into each of the tests eventually result into a document which is currently checked in at location https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/blob/master/docs/KubeConformance-1.9.md
I would like to have this PR reviewed for v1.10 as I consider it important to strengthen the conformance documents.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move the` k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/pointer` package to` k8s.io/utils/pointer`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Move `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/pointer` to `shared utils` directory, so that we can use it easily.
Close#66010 accidentally, and can't reopen it, so the same as #66010
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66686, 66760). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Error in return value should be tested
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Error in return value should be tested
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
test image for a release 1.7 based sample-apiserver
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In our e2e test suite we have use an image "gcr.io/kubernetes-e2e-test-images:k8s-aggregator-sample-apiserver:1.7v2". We need a way to build a fresh image that can we can use instead of that one. Especially we need one that has a multi-arch fat manifest so e2e tests can be run across multiple architectures.
This is especially important since we are in the process of promoting the test in question to the conformance suite - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63947
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mkumatag
/cc @ixdy
/cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66723, 66732). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix a duplicate case in TestUpdateNodeObjects
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62444, 66358, 66724, 66726). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
GetMasterHost should not return port
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
masterUrl.Host may include port, e.g. 10.114.51.201:8443
GetMasterHost() should not return port
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66593, 66727, 66558). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Bump version since we added dnsmasq to dnsutils image
Change-Id: Icf2335e95b0c5505be295b83f6d339269a8d418e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Forgot to bump version number in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66695
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
