Skips IPv6 tests on Windows.
Skips sysctl tests on Windows.
Skips network policy tests on Windows.
Skips RunAsUser / FSGroup / file permissions related tests, as those are
not supported on Windows.
Skips the test "should preserve source pod IP for traffic thru service cluster IP"
on Windows, as it creates a Pod with HostNetwork=true, which is unsupported.
What works and what doesn't work on Windows has been documented here:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/conformance-tests.md#windows--linux-considerations
A number of tests rely on SSH behavior but are not marked with
SkipUnlessSSHKeysPresent(). This means that the tests will run and
hang. This can be confusing for users because they may not know why
the tests failed. Instead, we should be reporting on the known issue
and skipping the test (hence why the helper Skip... function exists).
- Add a package "node" under e2e/framework and alias e2enode;
- Rename some functions whose name have redundant string.
Signed-off-by: Jiatong Wang <wangjiatong@vmware.com>
Quite a few images are only used a few times in a few tests. Thus,
the images are being centralized into the agnhost image, reducing
the number of images that have to be pulled and used.
This PR replaces the usage of the following images with agnhost:
- net
- netexec
- nettest
- webhook
The framework/ssh.go code was heavily used throughout the framework
and could be useful elsewhere but reusing those methods requires
importing all of the framework.
Extracting these methods to their own package for reuse.
Only a few methods had to be copied into this package from the
rest of the framework to avoid an import cycle.
**What type of PR is this?**
/kind cleanup
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Staging the GCE Cloud Provider as part of KEP [20190125-removing-in-tree-providers](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-cloud-provider/20190125-removing-in-tree-providers.md). Staging repo setup here https://github.com/kubernetes/legacy-cloud-providers
Moves the GCE cloud provider implementation to staging.
This is in preparation for moving the cloud provider code out of tree entirely.
However we need it in staging while the code needs to be consumed both in/out of tree.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?**:
```
NONE
```
Updated import dependency tracking.
Factored in the cleanup from #77412
Minor fix to go.mod.
This is part of the transition to using framework/log instead
of the Logf inside the framework package. This will help with
import size/cycles when importing the framework or subpackages.
This is a part of a series for fixing golint failures for util.go.
- fixes `should not use dot imports` about `ginkgo` and `gomega`
- fixes golint failures from top of file to line 1394 at original util.go
This fixes golint failures of the following file:
- test/e2e/framework/util.go
This changes following files because of change function name
in above file.
- test/e2e/e2e.go
- test/e2e/network/network_tiers.go
- test/e2e/network/service.go
Improve readability in e2e network service tests by using differently
named methods for a test with a transition and without a transition.
This replaces a boolean argument, which didn't give any indication w.r.t
its purpose (unless one read the method).
We REJECT every other case. Close this FIXME.
To get this to work in all cases, we have to process service in
filter.INPUT, since LB IPS might be manged as local addresses.
This is a prefactoring for followup changes that need to use very
similar but subtly different test. Now it is more generic, though it
pushes a little logic up the stack. That makes sense to me.
Force ELB to ensureHealthCheck when target pool exists.
Add e2e test to ensure that HC interval will be reconciled when
kube-controller-manager restarts.
Health checks with bigger thresholds and larger intervals will not be reconciled.
Add unittest for ILB and ELB to ensure HC reconciles and is configurable.
Not all users of the E2E framework want to run cloud-provider specific
tests. By splitting out the code it becomes possible to decide in
a E2E test suite which providers are supported.
This is achieved in two ways:
- the framework calls certain functions through a provider
interface instead of calling specific cloud provider functions
directly
- tests that are cloud-provider specific directly import the
new provider packages
The ingress test utilities are only needed by a few tests. Splitting
them out into a separate package makes the framework simpler for test
suites not using those tests.
Fixes: #66649
Individual implementations are not yet being moved.
Fixed all dependencies which call the interface.
Fixed golint exceptions to reflect the move.
Added project info as per @dims and
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project.
Added dims to the security contacts.
Fixed minor issues.
Added missing template files.
Copied ControllerClientBuilder interface to cp.
This allows us to break the only dependency on K8s/K8s.
Added TODO to ControllerClientBuilder.
Fixed GoDeps.
Factored in feedback from JustinSB.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67061, 66589, 67121, 67149). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Get load balancer name per provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
GetLoadBalancerName() should be implemented per cloud provider as opposed to one neutral implementation.
This PR will address this by moving `cloudprovider.GetLoadBalancerName()` to the `LoadBalancer interface` and then provide an implementation for each cloud provider, while maintaining previously expected functionality.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes [#43173](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43173)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a work in progress. Looking for feedback as I work on this, from any interested parties.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fixtodo:Move ServeHostnameService constants and default settings to service_util.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fixtodo:Move ServeHostnameService constants and default settings to service_util.go
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix todo: use the ServiceTestJig replace of service in e2e/network/service.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix todo: use the ServiceTestJig replace of service in e2e/network/service.go
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e service] Fix CleanupGCEResources for regional test
*What this PR does / why we need it**:
From https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/google-gke-staging#gke-staging-1-8-1-9-upgrade-regional-cluster&width=20, regional cluster test is failing because the GCE resource cleanup function attempts to parse region from `--gcp-zone` while regional cluster only set `--gcp-region`.
This PR pipes region into the cleanup function as well. This will need to be cherrypicked to 1.8 and 1.9.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @bowei @wojtek-t
cc @nikhiljindal to see if there is anything should be fixed for federation.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
note that we don't change the behaviour of kubectl.
For example it won't scale new resources. That's the end goal.
The first step is to retrofit existing code to use the generic scaler.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 56250, 56809, 56812, 56792, 56724). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Hit ILB endpoint in e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
During the ILB e2e networking test, a pod is created and curls the ILB's IP address, validating that the load balancer correctly routes traffic to the K8s service. Test will also hit the external LB endpoint after switching from ILB->ELB, validating no GCE conversion issues going from ILB to ELB.
This does not validate that the load balancer is accessible externally to the cluster (but on the same network).
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54604, 55781, 55806, 55935, 55991). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use core client with explicit version
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Core client without explicit version has been deprecated, change them to the one with explicit version.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes partially #55993
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/cc @caesarxuchao @k82cn @sttts @kevin-wangzefeng
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52748, 56623). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add brackets around IPv6 addrs in e2e test IP:port endpoints
There are several locations in the e2e tests where endpoints of the
form IPv6:port use IPv6 addresses directly, without surrounding brackets.
Brackets are required around IPv6 addresses in this case, in order to
distinguish the colons in the IPv6 address from the colon immediately
preceding the port.
Also, wherever the curl command might be used with an IPv6 address
surrounded in brackets, the "-g" argument is added to the curl
command line arguments so that the brackets can be interpreted
correctly.
fixes#52746
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds brackets around IPv6 addresses when they appear as part of an IPv6-addr:port endpoint
in the e2e tests. This is needed because any connections that attempt to use IPv6-addr:port
endpoint without brackets surrounding the IPv6-addr will fail.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#52746
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
There are several locations in the e2e tests where endpoints of the
form IP:port use IPv6 addresses directly, without surrounding brackets.
Brackets are required around IPv6 addresses in this case, in order to
distinguish the colons in the IPv6 address from the colon immediately
preceding the port.
Also, wherever the curl command might be used with an IPv6 address
surrounded in brackets, the "-g" argument is added to the curl
command line arguments so that the brackets can be interpreted
correctly.
fixes#52746
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Check dup NodePort with protocols when update services
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As the title says.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48579fixes: #54898fixes: #55327
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @freehan
/cc @cblecker
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
