1. Update the configuration file for Photon Controller cloud provider
2. Only master nodes can communicate with Photon Controller endpoint
3. Enable support for authentication-enabled Photon Controller endpoint
4. Update NodeAddresses function for query from local node
The clientset will throw an error for aggregated apiservers because the
clientset looks for specific versions of apis that are compiled into
the client. These will be missing from aggregated apiservers.
The discoveryclient is fully dynamic and does not rely on compiled
in apiversions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40289, 40877, 40879, 39972, 40942)
Extract util used by jsonmergepatch and SMPatch
followup https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40666#discussion_r99198931
Extract some util out of the `strategicMergePatch` to make `jsonMergePatch` doesn't depend on `strategicMergePatch`.
```release-note
None
```
cc: @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40289, 40877, 40879, 39972, 40942)
Rename experimental-cgroups-per-pod flag
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Rename `experimental-cgroups-per-qos` to `cgroups-per-qos`
1. Update hack/local-up-cluster to match `CGROUP_DRIVER` with docker runtime if used.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
We plan to roll this feature out in the upcoming release. Previous node e2e runs were running with this feature on by default. We will default this feature on for all e2es next week.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Rename --experiemental-cgroups-per-qos to --cgroups-per-qos
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40289, 40877, 40879, 39972, 40942)
Remove the temporary fix for pre-1.0 mirror pods
The fix was introduced to fix#15960 for pre-1.0 pods. It should be safe to remove
this fix now.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
CRI: Handle cri in-place upgrade
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40051.
## How does this PR restart/remove legacy containers/sandboxes?
With this PR, dockershim will convert and return legacy containers and infra containers as regular containers/sandboxes. Then we can rely on the SyncPod logic to stop the legacy containers/sandboxes, and the garbage collector to remove the legacy containers/sandboxes.
To forcibly trigger restart:
* For infra containers, we manually set `hostNetwork` to opposite value to trigger a restart (See [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/kubelet/kuberuntime/kuberuntime_manager.go#L389))
* For application containers, they will be restarted with the infra container.
## How does this PR avoid extra overhead when there is no legacy container/sandbox?
For the lack of some labels, listing legacy containers needs extra `docker ps`. We should not introduce constant performance regression for legacy container cleanup. So we added the `legacyCleanupFlag`:
* In `ListContainers` and `ListPodSandbox`, only do extra `ListLegacyContainers` and `ListLegacyPodSandbox` when `legacyCleanupFlag` is `NotDone`.
* When dockershim starts, it will check whether there are legacy containers/sandboxes.
* If there are none, it will mark `legacyCleanupFlag` as `Done`.
* If there are any, it will leave `legacyCleanupFlag` as `NotDone`, and start a goroutine periodically check whether legacy cleanup is done.
This makes sure that there is overhead only when there are legacy containers/sandboxes not cleaned up yet.
## Caveats
* In-place upgrade will cause kubelet to restart all running containers.
* RestartNever container will not be restarted.
* Garbage collector sometimes keep the legacy containers for a long time if there aren't too many containers on the node. In that case, dockershim will keep performing extra `docker ps` which introduces overhead.
* Manually remove all legacy containers will fix this.
* Should we garbage collect legacy containers/sandboxes in dockershim by ourselves? /cc @yujuhong
* Host port will not be reclaimed for the lack of checkpoint for legacy sandboxes. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39903 /cc @freehan
/cc @yujuhong @feiskyer @dchen1107 @kubernetes/sig-node-api-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
We should mention the caveats of in-place upgrade in release note.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Plumb subresource through subjectaccessreview
plumb all fields for subjectaccessreview into the resulting `authorizer.AttributesRecord`
```release-note
The SubjectAccessReview API passes subresource and resource name information to the authorizer to answer authorization queries.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Optionally avoid evicting critical pods in kubelet
For #40573
```release-note
When feature gate "ExperimentalCriticalPodAnnotation" is set, Kubelet will avoid evicting pods in "kube-system" namespace that contains a special annotation - `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/critical-pod`
This feature should be used in conjunction with the rescheduler to guarantee availability for critical system pods - https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/rescheduler/
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40696, 39914, 40374)
Forgiveness library changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Splited from #34825, contains library changes that are needed to implement forgiveness:
1. ~~make taints-tolerations matching respect timestamps, so that one toleration can just tolerate a taint for only a period of time.~~ As TaintManager is caching taints and observing taint changes, time-based checking is now outside the library (in TaintManager). see #40355.
2. make tolerations respect wildcard key.
3. add/refresh some related functions to wrap taints-tolerations operation.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Related issue: #1574
Related PR: #34825, #39469
~~Please note that the first 2 commits in this PR come from #39469 .~~
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
~~Since currently we have `pkg/api/helpers.go` and `pkg/api/v1/helpers.go`, there are some duplicated periods of code laying in these two files.~~
~~Ideally we should move taints-tolerations related functions into a separate package (pkg/util/taints), and make it a unified set of implementations. But I'd just suggest to do it in a follow-up PR after Forgiveness ones done, in case of feature Forgiveness getting blocked to long.~~
**Release note**:
```release-note
make tolerations respect wildcard key
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40795, 40863)
Use caching secret manager in kubelet
I just found that this is in my local branch I'm using for testing, but not in master :)
