Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: must lower-case token portion used in DNS label.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: In Kubernetes, DNS labels must be lower-case. `kubeadm` doesn't care when creating certain objects through the API. This PR fixes that erroneous behavior.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/104
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @mikedanese @dgoodwin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39495, 39547)
kubeadm: updated preflight types to avoid stutter
Small change to kubeadm preflight pkg to remove stutter from preflight types PreFlightError and PreFlightCheck (now names Error and Checker).
**Release note**:
`NONE`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39684, 39577, 38989, 39534, 39702)
kubeadm: refactored token discovery.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: refactored `kubeadm` token discovery to follow the discovery interface and use new TLS bootstrap mechanism.
/cc @luxas @mikedanese
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39673, 39536, 39617, 39540, 39686)
kubeadm: updated DNS deployment.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Updates KubeDNS deployment to match upstream.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: It was tested manually by bootstrapping a new cluster, running a busybox container and making sure one could `nslookup` from within the container to find `kubernetes` and other services.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implemented file and HTTPS based discovery for kubeadm
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements both file and HTTPS based discovery for `kubeadm`.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/93
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/94
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I'd like to add some tests but 'm sure `kubeconfig` loading is already covered by other tests in `clientcmd` package.
/cc @luxas @pipejakob
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm token discovery URL may not have valid input for url.Parse
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/95
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @dgoodwin @luxas @mikedanese this is a WIP! Need a couple things:
* decide token separator, `.` or `:`
* define error handling in `token.go::37`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: change etcd data dir to match host path.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Trivial change that adopts a well-known path for etcd data, following the `hostPath` defined.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/80
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @luxas @kad
Without this change, using a non-token discovery mechanism during a join
triggers a nil pointer panic (instead of an error message about not
being implemented yet).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix cloud-config name in test case
**What this PR does / why we need it**: fixes default cloud-config name in test cases for reset.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: related to kubernetes/kubeadm#75
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
use bytes.Buffer instead of append for error string concat
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. in my benchmark test, `bytes.Buffer` takes much less time ( about 1:1000 ) than string append( `+=` ).
>BenchmarkAppendConcat-4 100000 151438 ns/op 578181 B/op 2 allocs/op
BenchmarkBufferSprintf-4 3000000 487 ns/op 65 B/op 3 allocs/op
BenchmarkBufferConcat-4 5000000 271 ns/op 47 B/op 1 allocs/op
the benchmark codes is here https://play.golang.org/p/LS52zGuwZN
2. in our `RunInitMasterChecks`, `RunJoinNodeChecks` there are lots of preflight checks. they may result in a huge error message. so `bytes.Buffer` can bring considerable performance enhancement in the worst of conditions.
beyond that, this PR
1. fix an exported struct comment,
1. and use `found = append( found, errs...)` instead of for loop for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: bruceauyeung <ouyang.qinhua@zte.com.cn>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Default to using token discovery.
Recent changes to support multiple methods for discovery meant that
"kubeadm init" no longer was sufficient and users would need to add
"--discovery token://" to achieve the same results.
Instead lets assume discovery if the user does not specify anything else
to maintain parity and the brevity of our original instructions.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
CC @mikedanese @luxas
Recent changes to support multiple methods for discovery meant that
"kubeadm init" no longer was sufficient and users would need to add
"--discovery token://" to achieve the same results.
Instead lets assume discovery if the user does not specify anything else
to maintain parity and the brevity of our original instructions.
Adds kubeadm subcommands to create, list, and delete bootstrap tokens.
Tokens can be created with a TTL duration, or 0 for tokens that will not
expire. The create command can also be used to specify your own token
(for use when bootstrapping masters and nodes in parallel), or update an
existing token's secret or ttl.
Marked "ex" for experimental for now as the boostrap controllers are not
yet hooked up in core.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
path.Clean paths in GlobalEnvParams and remove unnecessary path.Join
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. clean all paths in `GlobalEnvParams`
1. remove unnecessary path.Join call in `pki.go`
2. fix some typos and comment errors
Signed-off-by: bruceauyeung <ouyang.qinhua@zte.com.cn>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: cmd/kubeadm
cc @jbeda @mikedanese @luxas @errordeveloper
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the future in
the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers**
section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
