In the `NodeSupportsPreconfiguredRuntimeClassHandler`, update the check
for the runtime handler to return a failure if the
`/etc/containerd/config.toml` or `/etc/crio/crio.conf` config files do
not exist. If an error is returned, then the underlying test will be
skipped.
Test manually with starting a kind cluster and moving the containerd
config file and verifying that the test is skipped:
```
$ docker exec -it kind-worker /bin/bash
root@kind-worker:/# mv /etc/containerd/config.toml /etc/containerd/config.toml.bak
```
```
make WHAT="test/e2e/e2e.test"
$ ./_output/bin/e2e.test -kubeconfig /tmp/kubeconfig_kind -ginkgo.focus=".*should run a Pod requesting a RuntimeClass with a configured handler.*" --num-nodes=1 2>&1 -ginkgo.v=1 | tee -i "/tmp/build-log.txt"
[sig-node] RuntimeClass [It] should run a Pod requesting a RuntimeClass with a configured handler [NodeFeature:RuntimeHandler]
test/e2e/common/node/runtimeclass.go:85
[SKIPPED] Skipping test as node does not have E2E runtime class handler preconfigured in container runtime config: command terminated with exit code 1
```
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
There are two runtime class tests which required the container runtime
config to include explicit configuration for `test-handler`. The current
logic skips these tests in non GCE environments. This skip is too strict
since the test is skipped in node e2e environments and in other
environments such as kind, which support running the test and also
configure `test-handler`.
Instead of skipping based on provider, add a new function
`NodeSupportsPreconfiguredRuntimeClassHandler` which examines the
underlying container runtime config and checks if the config includes
`test-handler`. The check is a bit brittle since it assumes container
runtime config paths, but it is a net improvement over skipping the test
entirely on non GCE environments.
This results in the test working in the common test environments, namely
GCE kube-up, node e2e, and kind.
Signed-off-by: David Porter <david@porter.me>
