Automatic merge from submit-queue
Extend secrets volumes with path control
As per [1] this PR extends secrets mapped into volume with:
* key-to-path mapping the same way as is for configmap. E.g.
```
{
"apiVersion": "v1",
"kind": "Pod",
"metadata": {
"name": "mypod",
"namespace": "default"
},
"spec": {
"containers": [{
"name": "mypod",
"image": "redis",
"volumeMounts": [{
"name": "foo",
"mountPath": "/etc/foo",
"readOnly": true
}]
}],
"volumes": [{
"name": "foo",
"secret": {
"secretName": "mysecret",
"items": [{
"key": "username",
"path": "my-username"
}]
}
}]
}
}
```
Here the ``spec.volumes[0].secret.items`` added changing original target ``/etc/foo/username`` to ``/etc/foo/my-username``.
* secondly, refactoring ``pkg/volumes/secrets/secrets.go`` volume plugin to use ``AtomicWritter`` to project a secret into file.
[1] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/design/configmap.md#changes-to-secret
Provides fast transformations of int64 scaled values with overflow to
inf.Dec as needed. Attempts to reduce allocations and expensive
operations in the critical path.
Alters the public signature of Quantity to encourage more efficient use
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refactor persistent volume controller
Here is complete persistent controller as designed in https://github.com/pmorie/pv-haxxz/blob/master/controller.go
It's feature complete and compatible with current binder/recycler/provisioner. No new features, it *should* be much more stable and predictable.
Testing
--
The unit test framework is quite complicated, still it was necessary to reach reasonable coverage (78% in `persistentvolume_controller.go`). The untested part are error cases, which are quite hard to test in reasonable way - sure, I can inject a VersionConflictError on any object update and check the error bubbles up to appropriate places, but the real test would be to run `syncClaim`/`syncVolume` again and check it recovers appropriately from the error in the next periodic sync. That's the hard part.
Organization
---
The PR starts with `rm -rf kubernetes/pkg/controller/persistentvolume`. I find it easier to read when I see only the new controller without old pieces scattered around.
[`types.go` from the old controller is reused to speed up matching a bit, the code looks solid and has 95% unit test coverage].
I tried to split the PR into smaller patches, let me know what you think.
~~TODO~~
--
* ~~Missing: provisioning, recycling~~.
* ~~Fix integration tests~~
* ~~Fix e2e tests~~
@kubernetes/sig-storage
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/24331)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes#15632
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make name validators return string slices
Part of the larger validation PR, broken out for easier review and merge. Builds on previous PRs in the series.
The key to path mapping allows pod to specify different name (thus location) of each secret.
At the same time refactor the volume plugin to use AtomicWritter to project secrets to files in a volume.
Update e2e Secrets test, the secret file permission has changed from 0444 to 0644
Remove TestPluginIdempotent as the AtomicWritter is responsible for secret creation
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make IsValidLabelValue return error strings
Part of the larger validation PR, broken out for easier review and merge. Builds on previous PRs in the series.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add init containers to pods
This implements #1589 as per proposal #23666
Incorporates feedback on #1589, creates parallel structure for InitContainers and Containers, adds validation for InitContainers that requires name uniqueness, and comments on a number of implications of init containers.
This is a complete alpha implementation.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/23567)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
test: Call forgotten resttest test
PR #3789 introduced this test, but it was never called.
This test was created, but never called.
Written, but never run.
It has neither flaked nor asserted. At its inception it was deserted.
My change gives this test a chance, to at long last finally pass.
The resttest stuff is a bit complicated and I'm not totally sure I put it in the right place @smarterclayton, want to double check this change makes sense?
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Conversions have kube-isms and are not portable for downstream
Some minor fixes to enable generators for OpenShift and others who need
to generate conversions on Kube API groups outside the core.
@deads2k
Automatic merge from submit-queue
validate third party resources
addresses validation portion of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/22768
* ThirdPartyResource: validates name (3 segment DNS subdomain) and version names (single segment DNS label)
* ThirdPartyResourceData: validates objectmeta (name is validated as a DNS label)
* removes ability to use GenerateName with thirdpartyresources (kind and api group should not be randomized, in my opinion)
test improvements:
* updates resttest to clean up after create tests (so the same valid object can be used)
* updates resttest to take a name generator (in case "foo1" isn't a valid name for the object under test)
action required for alpha thirdpartyresource users:
* existing thirdpartyresource objects that do not match these validation rules will need to be removed/updated (after removing thirdpartyresourcedata objects stored under the disallowed versions, kind, or group names)
* existing thirdpartyresourcedata objects that do not match the name validation rule will not be able to be updated, but can be removed
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Optimize group version allocations
Avoid allocation in strings.Split() for most common cases.
Extracted from #24845
@wojtek-t or @deads2k
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make IsQualifiedName return error strings
Part of the larger validation PR, broken out for easier review and merge.
@lavalamp FYI, but I know you're swamped, too.
