Automatic merge from submit-queue
Don't blame DNS spec on Kubernetes requirement for lower-case DNS labels.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: #39635 was rejected because it wasn't clear to the author (me) that lower-case DNS labels are in fact a [Kubernetes requirement](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39635#issuecomment-271404975) rather than from the [DNS RFC 1035](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt) or/and [DNS RFC 1123](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1123.txt).
**Special notes for your reviewer**: @thockin this is a first pass to make the error messages clearer about the fact that DNS specs are not to _blame_.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
replace global registry in apimachinery with global registry in k8s.io/kubernetes
We'd like to remove all globals, but our immediate problem is that a shared registry between k8s.io/kubernetes and k8s.io/client-go doesn't work. Since client-go makes a copy, we can actually keep a global registry with other globals in pkg/api for now.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39394, 38270, 39473, 39516, 36243)
Improve an error message when privileged containers are disallowed on the cluster
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
At present when user creates privileged pod and creation of privileged containers disallowed globally by a system administrator (kubelet and api-server were running with `--allow-privileged=false`), user will get the following error message:
```console
$ kubectl create -f nginx.pod
The Pod "nginx" is invalid: spec.containers[0].securityContext.privileged: Forbidden: disallowed by policy
```
"Disallowed by policy" may give a wrong assumption to a user that creation of privileged containers disallowed by [`PodSecurityPolicy`](http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/pod-security-policy/) while it's not.
This commit improves error message and tries to point user to the right direction:
```console
$ kubectl create -f nginx.pod
The Pod "nginx" is invalid: spec.containers[0].securityContext.privileged: Forbidden: privileged containers are disallowed on this cluster by a system administrator
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
PTAL @pweil-
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38433, 36245)
Allow pods to define multiple environment variables from a whole ConfigMap
Allow environment variables to be populated from ConfigMaps
- ConfigMaps represent an entire set of EnvVars
- EnvVars can override ConfigMaps
fixes#26299
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39284, 39367)
Remove HostRecord annotation (beta feature)
The annotation has made it to GA so this code should be deleted.
**Release note**:
```release-note
The 'endpoints.beta.kubernetes.io/hostnames-map' annotation is no longer supported. Users can use the 'Endpoints.subsets[].addresses[].hostname' field instead.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make pvc storage class annotation immutable after create
Fixes#34516
Added immutable check in validation.go
```
# Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored,
# and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be
# reopened with the relevant failures.
#
# persistentvolumeclaims "gce-claim-storageclass" was not valid:
# * metadata.annotations.volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: Invalid value: "slow2": field is immutable
#
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improved validation error message when env.valueFrom contains no (or …
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
A misleading error message is shown if the user mistypes (or forgets to specify) a field under env.valueFrom. This is the error message: "may not have more than one field specified at a time". But there is only one (misspelled) field specified.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```
Improved error message for missing/misspelled field under env.valueFrom
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/api
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
- Prevents kubelet from overwriting capacity during sync.
- Handles opaque integer resources in the scheduler.
- Adds scheduler predicate tests for opaque resources.
- Validates opaque int resources:
- Ensures supplied opaque int quantities in node capacity,
node allocatable, pod request and pod limit are integers.
- Adds tests for new validation logic (node update and pod spec).
- Added e2e tests for opaque integer resources.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Loadbalanced client src ip preservation enters beta
Sounds like we're going to try out the proposal (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/30819#issuecomment-249877334) for annotations -> fields on just one feature in 1.5 (scheduler). Or do we want to just convert to fields right now?
Automatic merge from submit-queue
requests.storage is a standard resource name
The value `requests.storage` is a valid standard resource name but was omitted from the standard list.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add validation that detects repeated keys in the labels and annotations maps
Fixes#2965 (a nearly 2 year old feature request!)
@kubernetes/kubectl
@eparis
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add unit test for bad ReclaimPolicy and valid ReclaimPolicy in /pkg/api/validation
unit tests for validation.go regarding PersistentVolumeReclaimPolicy (bad value and good value)
see PR: #30304
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add PVC storage to LimitRange
This PR adds the ability to add a LimitRange to a namespace that enforces min/max on `pvc.Spec.Resources.Requests["storage"]`.
@derekwaynecarr @abhgupta @kubernetes/sig-storage
Examples forthcoming.
```release-note
pvc.Spec.Resources.Requests min and max can be enforced with a LimitRange of type "PersistentVolumeClaim" in the namespace
```
* flocker datasets should be attached using an unique identifier. This
is not the case for the name metadata used by datasetName
* allow only one of datasetUUID / datasetName specified
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Split path validation into a separate library
This PR splits path segment validation into it's own package. This cuts off one of the restclient's dependency paths to some docker packages, and completely eliminates its dependency on go-restful swagger validation.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add AppArmor feature gate
Add option to disable AppArmor via a feature gate. This PR treats AppArmor as Beta, and thus depends on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/31471 (I will remove `do-not-merge` once that merges).
Note that disabling AppArmor means that pods with AppArmor annotations will be rejected in validation. It does not mean that the components act as though AppArmor was never implemented. This is by design, because we want to make it difficult to accidentally run a Pod with an AppArmor annotation without AppArmor protection.
/cc @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add validation preventing recycle of / in a hostPath PV
Adds a validation that prevents a user from recycling `/` when it is used in a hostPath PV
cc @kubernetes/sig-storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add validation for PV spec to ensure correct values are used for ReclaimPolicy on initial create
k8 currently allows invalid values for ReclaimPolicy (i.e. "scotto") - this allows the PV to be created and even bound, however, when the pvc or pod is deleted and the recycler is triggered, an error is thrown
```
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
36s 36s 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning VolumeUnknownReclaimPolicy Volume has unrecognized PersistentVolumeReclaimPolicy
```
New behavior will not allow the user to create the PV:
```
[root@k8dev nfs]# kubectl create -f nfs-pv-bad.yaml
The PersistentVolume "pv-gce" is invalid: spec.persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Unsupported value: "scotto": supported values: Delete, Recycle, Retain
```
The serviceAccountName is occasionally useful for clients running on
Kube that need to know who they are when talking to other components.
The nodeName is useful for PetSet or DaemonSet pods that need to make
calls back to the API to fetch info about their node.
Both fields are immutable, and cannot easily be retrieved in another
way.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Basic scaler/reaper for petset
Currently scaling or upgrading a petset is more complicated than it should be. Would be nice if this made code freeze on friday. I'm planning on a follow up change with generation number and e2es post freeze.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix pvc requests.storage validation
A `PersistentVolumeClaim` should not be able to request a negative amount of storage.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-storage @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra @deads2k
This implements the proposal in:
docs/proposals/secret-configmap-downwarapi-file-mode.md
Fixes: #28317.
The mounttest image is updated so it returns the permissions of the linked file
and not the symlink itself.
