1. Validate that templateGeneration is increased when and only when template is changed
2. Validate that templateGeneration is never decreased
3. Added validation tests for templateGeneration
4. Fix a bunch of errors in validate tests, for example, all validation test error cases failed
on lack of resource version, or on name changes, not on the real validation we wanted to test
- Add a new type PortworxVolumeSource
- Implement the kubernetes volume plugin for Portworx Volumes under pkg/volume/portworx
- The Portworx Volume Driver uses the libopenstorage/openstorage specifications and apis for volume operations.
Changes for k8s configuration and examples for portworx volumes.
- Add PortworxVolume hooks in kubectl, kube-controller-manager and validation.
- Add a README for PortworxVolume usage as PVs, PVCs and StorageClass.
- Add example spec files
Handle code review comments.
- Modified READMEs to incorporate to suggestions.
- Add a test for ReadWriteMany access mode.
- Use util.UnmountPath in TearDown.
- Add ReadOnly flag to PortworxVolumeSource
- Use hostname:port instead of unix sockets
- Delete the mount dir in TearDown.
- Fix link issue in persistentvolumes README
- In unit test check for mountpath after Setup is done.
- Add PVC Claim Name as a Portworx Volume Label
Generated code and documentation.
- Updated swagger spec
- Updated api-reference docs
- Updated generated code under pkg/api/v1
Godeps update for Portworx Volume Driver
- Adds github.com/libopenstorage/openstorage
- Adds go.pedge.io/pb/go/google/protobuf
- Updates Godep Licenses
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Fix availableReplicas validation
An available replica is a ready replica, not the other way around
@kubernetes/sig-apps-bugs caught while testing https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42097
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40497, 39769, 40554, 40569, 40597)
NetworkPolicy validation improvements
I noticed while implementing NetworkPolicy that I we weren't validating the "Ports" field at all.
The docs are actually completely silent about what a string-valued Port field is supposed to mean. I had guessed it meant to call `net.LookupPort()` on it (ie, map it from /etc/services) but in every other case where we have an IntOrString-valued Port field in an API struct, it refers to a named ContainerPort. But that would be extremely awkward to implement in this case; a policy specifying a named port could end up mapping to a different numeric port on every container in the namespace... Do other people actually implement string-valued ports that way? Or, for that matter, implement string-valued ports at all? (Related: I hadn't noticed until now that you can leave the Port value unspecified, allowing you to say "allow to all UDP ports, but no TCP ports" or "allow to all TCP ports, but no UDP ports". That seems like something that ended up in the spec just because it was possible, not because it was actually useful...)
@kubernetes/sig-network-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37845, 39439, 39514, 39457, 38866)
Move watch/versioned to pkg/apis/meta/v1/watch.go
Watch is a part of the server API
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39466, 39490, 39527)
bump gengo to latest
bumping gengo to limit surprises while working on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39475
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
