Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42762, 42739, 42425, 42778)
Fixed potential OutOfSync of nodeInfo.
The cloned NodeInfo still share the same resource objects in cache; it may make `requestedResource` and Pods OutOfSync, for example, if the pod was deleted, the `requestedResource` is updated by Pods are not in cloned info. Found this when investigating #32531 , but seems not the root cause, as nodeInfo are readonly in predicts & priorities.
Sample codes for `&(*)`:
```
package main
import (
"fmt"
)
type Resource struct {
A int
}
type Node struct {
Res *Resource
}
func main() {
r1 := &Resource { A:10 }
n1 := &Node{Res: r1}
r2 := &(*n1.Res)
r2.A = 11
fmt.Printf("%t, %d %d\n", r1==r2, r1, r2)
}
```
Output:
```
true, &{11} &{11}
```
- Added schedulercache.Resource.SetOpaque helper.
- Amend kubelet allocatable sync so that when OIRs are removed from capacity
they are also removed from allocatable.
- Fixes#41861.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42200, 39535, 41708, 41487, 41335)
Add support for statefulset spreading to the scheduler
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The scheduler SelectorSpread priority funtion didn't have the code to spread pods of StatefulSets. This PR adds StatefulSets to the list of controllers that SelectorSpread supports.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#41513
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add the support to the scheduler for spreading pods of StatefulSets.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
Improve code coverage for scheduler/algorithmprovider/defaults
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Improve code coverage for scheduler/algorithmprovider/defaults from #39559
Thanks for your review.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41954, 40528, 41875, 41165, 41877)
Move the scheduler Fake* to testing folder
Address this issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41662
@timothysc I moved the interface to the types.go, and the Fake* to the testing package, not sure whether you like or not.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Optimization of on-wire information sent to scheduler extender interfaces that are stateful
The changes are to address the issue described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40991
```release-note
Added support to minimize sending verbose node information to scheduler extender by sending only node names and expecting extenders to cache the rest of the node information
```
cc @ravigadde
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Allow updates to pod tolerations.
Opening this PR to continue discussion for pod spec tolerations updates when a pod has been scheduled already. This PR is built on top of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38957.
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews @liggitt @davidopp @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Guaranteed admission for Critical Pods
This is the first step in implementing node-level preemption for critical pods.
It defines the AdmissionFailureHandler interface, which allows callers, like the kubelet, to define how failed predicates are handled, and take steps to correct failures if necessary.
In the kubelet's implementation, it triggers preemption if the pod being admitted is critical, and if the only failed predicates are InsufficientResourceErrors, then it prempts (not yet implemented) other other pods to allow admission of the critical pod.
cc: @vishh
node cache don't need to get all the information about every
candidate node. For huge clusters, sending full node information
of all nodes in the cluster on the wire every time a pod is scheduled
is expensive. If the scheduler is capable of caching node information
along with its capabilities, sending node name alone is sufficient.
These changes provide that optimization in a backward compatible way
- removed the inadvertent signature change of Prioritize() function
- added defensive checks as suggested
- added annotation specific test case
- updated the comments in the scheduler types
- got rid of apiVersion thats unused
- using *v1.NodeList as suggested
- backing out pod annotation update related changes made in the
1st commit
- Adjusted the comments in types.go and v1/types.go as suggested
in the code review
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add scheduler predicate to filter for max Azure disks attached
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR adds scheduler predicates for maximum Azure Disks count. This allows to use the environment variable KUBE_MAX_PD_VOLS on scheduler the same as it's already possible with GCE and AWS.
This is needed as we need a way to specify the maximum attachable disks on Azure to avoid permanently failing disk attachment in cases k8s scheduled too many PODs with AzureDisk volumes onto the same node.
I've chosen 16 as the default value for DefaultMaxAzureDiskVolumes even though it may be too high for many smaller VM types and too low for the larger VM types. This means, the default behavior may change for clusters with large VM types. For smaller VM types, the behavior will not change (it will keep failing attaching).
In the future, the value should be determined at run time on a per node basis, depending on the VM size. I know that this is already implemented in the ongoing Azure Managed Disks work, but I don't remember where to find this anymore and also forgot who was working on this. Maybe @colemickens can help here.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Support KUBE_MAX_PD_VOLS on Azure
```
CC @colemickens @brendandburns
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adjust nodiskconflict support based on iscsi multipath.
With the multipath support is in place, to declare whether both iscsi disks are same, we need to only depend on IQN.
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@redhat.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improved code coverage for plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/priorities…
…/most_requested.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Part of #39559 , code coverage improved from 70+% to 80+%
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41378, 41413, 40743, 41155, 41385)
'core' package to prevent dependency creep and isolate core functiona…
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Solves these two problems:
- Top level Scheduler root directory has several files in it that are needed really by the factory and algorithm implementations. Thus they should be subpackages of scheduler.
- In addition scheduler.go and generic_scheduler.go don't naturally differentiate themselves when they are in the same package. scheduler.go is eseentially the daemon entry point and so it should be isolated from the core
*No release note needed*
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Removed a space in portforward.go.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40696, 39914, 40374)
Forgiveness library changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Splited from #34825, contains library changes that are needed to implement forgiveness:
1. ~~make taints-tolerations matching respect timestamps, so that one toleration can just tolerate a taint for only a period of time.~~ As TaintManager is caching taints and observing taint changes, time-based checking is now outside the library (in TaintManager). see #40355.
2. make tolerations respect wildcard key.
3. add/refresh some related functions to wrap taints-tolerations operation.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Related issue: #1574
Related PR: #34825, #39469
~~Please note that the first 2 commits in this PR come from #39469 .~~
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
~~Since currently we have `pkg/api/helpers.go` and `pkg/api/v1/helpers.go`, there are some duplicated periods of code laying in these two files.~~
~~Ideally we should move taints-tolerations related functions into a separate package (pkg/util/taints), and make it a unified set of implementations. But I'd just suggest to do it in a follow-up PR after Forgiveness ones done, in case of feature Forgiveness getting blocked to long.~~
**Release note**:
```release-note
make tolerations respect wildcard key
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40405, 38601, 40083, 40730)
fix typo
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix typo.
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 34543, 40606)
sync client-go and move util/workqueue
The vision of client-go is that it provides enough utilities to build a reasonable controller. It has been copying `util/workqueue`. This makes it authoritative.
@liggitt I'm getting really close to making client-go authoritative ptal.
approved based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40363
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Don't require failureDomains in PodAffinityChecker
`failureDomains` are only used for `PreferredDuringScheduling` pod
anti-affinity, which is ignored by `PodAffinityChecker`.
This unnecessary requirement was making it hard to move
`PodAffinityChecker` to `GeneralPredicates` because that would require
passing `--failure-domains` to both `kubelet` and `kube-controller-manager`.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40543, 39999)
Improve code coverage for scheduler/algorithm/priorities
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Improve code coverage for scheduler/algorithm/priorities from #39559
This is my first unit test for kubernetes , thanks for your review.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
