Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39947, 39936, 39902, 39859, 39915)
don't lie about starting the controllers in the controller manager
We print started even if it didn't start.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
replace global registry in apimachinery with global registry in k8s.io/kubernetes
We'd like to remove all globals, but our immediate problem is that a shared registry between k8s.io/kubernetes and k8s.io/client-go doesn't work. Since client-go makes a copy, we can actually keep a global registry with other globals in pkg/api for now.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39661, 39740, 39801, 39468, 39743)
add --controllers to controller manager
Adds a `--controllers` flag to the `kube-controller-manager` to indicate which controllers are enabled and disabled. From the help:
```
--controllers stringSlice A list of controllers to enable. '*' enables all on-by-default controllers, 'foo' enables the controller named 'foo', '-foo' disables the controller named 'foo'.
All controllers: certificatesigningrequests, cronjob, daemonset, deployment, disruption, endpoint, garbagecollector, horizontalpodautoscaling, job, namespace, podgc, replicaset, replicationcontroller, resourcequota, serviceaccount, statefuleset
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make discovery static when extensions/thirdpartyresources is not enabled
this should be a bug fix, if `extensions/thirdpartyresources` is enabled, the result of `Discovery().ServerPreferredNamespacedResources` will be dynamic then, so we are making the `discoverResourcesFn` static only when the `extensions/thirdpartyresources` is not enabled.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39150, 38615)
Add work queues to PV controller
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead, where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37959, 36221)
Recycle Pod Template Check
The kube-controller-manager has two command line arguments (--pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-hostpath and --pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-nfs) that specify a recycle pod template. The recycle pod template may not contain the volume that shall be recycled.
A check is added to make sure that the recycle pod template contains at least a volume.
cc: @jsafrane
The kube-controller-manager has two command line arguments (--pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-hostpath and --pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-nfs) that specify a recycle pod template. The recycle pod template may not contain the volume that shall be recycled.
A check is added to make sure that the recycle pod template contains at least a volume.
Currently, the HPA considers unready pods the same as ready pods when
looking at their CPU and custom metric usage. However, pods frequently
use extra CPU during initialization, so we want to consider them
separately.
This commit causes the HPA to consider unready pods as having 0 CPU
usage when scaling up, and ignores them when scaling down. If, when
scaling up, factoring the unready pods as having 0 CPU would cause a
downscale instead, we simply choose not to scale. Otherwise, we simply
scale up at the reduced amount caculated by factoring the pods in at
zero CPU usage.
The effect is that unready pods cause the autoscaler to be a bit more
conservative -- large increases in CPU usage can still cause scales,
even with unready pods in the mix, but will not cause the scale factors
to be as large, in anticipation of the new pods later becoming ready and
handling load.
Similarly, if there are pods for which no metrics have been retrieved,
these pods are treated as having 100% of the requested metric when
scaling down, and 0% when scaling up. As above, this cannot change the
direction of the scale.
This commit also changes the HPA to ignore superfluous metrics -- as
long as metrics for all ready pods are present, the HPA we make scaling
decisions. Currently, this only works for CPU. For custom metrics, we
cannot identify which metrics go to which pods if we get superfluous
metrics, so we abort the scale.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enable HPA controller based on autoscaling/v1 api group
ref #29778
``` release-note
Enable HPA controller based on autoscaling/v1 api group.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
lister-gen updates
- Remove "zz_generated." prefix from generated lister file names
- Add support for expansion interfaces
- Switch to new generated JobLister
@deads2k @liggitt @sttts @mikedanese @caesarxuchao for the lister-gen changes
@soltysh @deads2k for the informer / job controller changes
