Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow garbage collection to work against different API prefixes
The GC needs to build clients based only on Resource or Kind. Hoist the
restmapper out of the controller and the clientpool, support a new
ClientForGroupVersionKind and ClientForGroupVersionResource, and use the
appropriate one in both places.
Allows OpenShift to use the GC
The GC needs to build clients based only on Resource or Kind. Hoist the
restmapper out of the controller and the clientpool, support a new
ClientForGroupVersionKind and ClientForGroupVersionResource, and use the
appropriate one in both places.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow to use GetSigner with vagrant provider
In order to run tests that require ssh access to a node on vagrant
we need to provide path to private ssh key.
Now it will be possible to do using VAGRANT_SSH_KEY environment variable
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add test for --quiet flag for kubectl run
This adds a test for the changes introduced in #30247 and #28801.
Ref #28695
In order to run tests that require ssh access to a node on vagrant
we need to provide path to private ssh key.
Now it will be possible to do using VAGRANT_SSH_KEY environment variable
Change-Id: Ic5fe0037edd46d0db3b8036ad7fc03cf1ea07574
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Provide an e2e skip helper checking for available resource
@janetkuo @dims this is the promised util function, but unfortunately I just learned that dynamic client suffers from the problem I've fixed in the manually written one (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29187) I need to look into the dynamic client in that case :/
Automatic merge from submit-queue
update taints e2e, restrict taints operation with key, effect
Since taints are now unique by key, effect on a node, this PR is to restrict existing taints adding/removing/updating operations in taints e2e.
Also fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/31066#issuecomment-242870101
Related prior Issue/PR #29362 and #30590
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Log pressure condition, memory usage, events in memory eviction test
I want to log this to help us debug some of the latest memory eviction test flakes, where we are seeing burstable "fail" before the besteffort. I saw (in the logs) attempts by the eviction manager to evict besteffort a while before burstable phase changed to "Failed", but the besteffort's phase appeared to remain "Running". I want to see the pressure condition interleaved with the pod phases to get a sense of the eviction manager's knowledge vs. pod phase.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Return detailed error message for better debugging.
Try to provide more details error message for debugging when this flake #31561 happens again.
@pwittrock
