When a PVC explicitly requests specific PV and the PV does not match,
we should tell the user what exactly does not match.
From:
Volume's size is smaller than requested or volume's class does not match with claim
To:
Cannot bind to requested volume "<volume name>": %s
where %s is one of:
- requested PV is too small
- storageClasseNames do not match
- incompatible volumeMode
- error checking volumeMode: api defaulting for volumeMode failed (this should not ever happen)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 56375, 56872, 57053, 57165, 57218). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improved event generation in volume mount,attach, and extend operations
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#57217
refactored mount, attach, extend operation's so that all failures generate events and event generation is more consistent.
```release-note
Improved event generation in volume mount, attach, and extend operations
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54604, 55781, 55806, 55935, 55991). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use core client with explicit version
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Core client without explicit version has been deprecated, change them to the one with explicit version.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes partially #55993
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/cc @caesarxuchao @k82cn @sttts @kevin-wangzefeng
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51321, 55969, 55039, 56183, 55976). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Topology aware volume scheduler and PV controller changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Scheduler and PV controller changes to support volume topology aware scheduling, as specified in kubernetes/community#1168
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#54435
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
* I've split the PR into logical commits to make it easier to review
* The remaining TODOs I plan to address next release unless you think it needs to be done now
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adds alpha support for volume scheduling, which allows the scheduler to make PersistentVolume binding decisions while respecting the Pod's scheduling requirements. Dynamic provisioning is not supported with this feature yet.
Action required for existing users of the LocalPersistentVolumes alpha feature:
* The VolumeScheduling feature gate also has to be enabled on kube-scheduler and kube-controller-manager.
* The NoVolumeNodeConflict predicate has been removed. For non-default schedulers, update your scheduler policy.
* The CheckVolumeBinding predicate has to be enabled in non-default schedulers.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Block volumes Support: CRI, volumemanager and operationexecutor changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR contains following items to enable block volumes support feature.
- container runtime interface change
- volumemanager changes
- operationexecuto changes
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Based on this proposal (kubernetes/community#805) and this feature issue: kubernetes/features#351
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
There are another PRs related to this functionality.
(#50457) API Change
(#53385) VolumeMode PV-PVC Binding change
(#51494) Container runtime interface change, volumemanager changes, operationexecutor changes
(#55112) Block volume: Command line printer update
Plugins
(#51493) Block volumes Support: FC plugin update
(#54752) Block volumes Support: iSCSI plugin update
**Release note**:
```
Adds alpha support for block volume, which allows the users to attach raw block volume to their pod without filesystem on top of the volume.
```
/cc @msau42 @liggitt @jsafrane @saad-ali @erinboyd @screeley44
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54987, 55221, 54099, 55144, 54215). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Should not sync the volume when claim.Spec.VolumeName is null
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
PV controller should send events to PVCs and not PVs when a PVC requests PV
that's either too small or has mismatching StorageClass.
Regular users can't see events on PVs so `kubectl describe pvc` is the only
way how to tell user that something is wrong.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add storageClass.mountOptions and use it in all applicable plugins
split off from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50919 and still dependent on it. cc @gnufied
issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/168
```release-note
Add mount options field to StorageClass. The options listed there are automatically added to PVs provisioned using the class.
```
When API server crashes *after* saving a provisioned PV and before sending
200 OK, the controller tries to save the PV again. In this case, it gets
AlreadyExists error, which should be interpreted as success and not as error.
Especially, a volume that corresponds to the PV should not be deleted in the
underlying storage.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51441, 51356, 51460)
Don't update pvc.status.capacity if pvc is already Bound
As discussed here https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/657#discussion_r128008128, in order for `pvc.status.Capacity < pv.Spec.Capcity` to be the mechanism for volume filesystem* resize, the pv controller should stop updating pvc.status.Capacity every resync period.
/assign @jsafrane
/sig storage
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add volume operation metrics to operation executor and PV controller
This PR implements the proposal for high level volume metrics https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/809
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
~Differences from proposal:~ all resolved
~"verify_volume" is now "verify_volumes_are_attached" + "verify_volumes_are_attached_per_node" + "verify_controller_attached_volume." Which of them do we want?~
~There is no "mount_device" metric because the MountVolume operation combines MountDevice and mount (plugin.Setup). Do we want to extract the mount_device metric or is it okay to keep mountvolume as one? For attachable volumes, MountDevice is the actual mount and Setup is a bindmount + setvolumeownership. For unattachable, mountDevice does not occur and Setup is an actual mount + setvolumeownership.~
~PV controller metrics I did not implement following the proposal at all. I did not change goroutinemap nor scheduleOperation. Because provisionClaimOperation does not return an error, so it's impossible for the caller to know if there is actually a failure worth reporting. So I manually create a new metric inside the function according to some conditions.~
@gnufied
I have tested the operationexecutor metrics but not provision & delete. Sample:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add error count and time-taken metrics for storage operations such as mount and attach, per-volume-plugin.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
Prepare VolumeHost for running mount tools in containers
This is the first part of implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/278 - running mount utilities in containers.
It updates `VolumeHost` interface:
* `GetMounter()` now requires volume plugin name, as it is going to return different mounter to different volume plugings, because mount utilities for these plugins can be on different places.
* New `GetExec()` method that should volume plugins use to execute any utilities. This new `Exec` interface will execute them on proper place.
* `SafeFormatAndMount` is updated to the new `Exec` interface.
This is just a preparation, `GetExec` right now leads to simple `os.Exec` and mount utilities are executed on the same place as before. Also, the volume plugins will be updated in subsequent PRs (split into separate PRs, some plugins required lot of changes).
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
@rootfs @gnufied
