Automatic merge from submit-queue
Conversionlint
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a comment placeholder for the exported or public functions in conversion generator files. Such functions without a comment results into golint failure in various generated files. The changes in this patch takes care of about 36 related lint failures.
Given below is an example lint error,
zz_generated.conversion.go:91:1: exported function Convert_v1alpha1_Binding_To_servicecatalog_Binding should have comment or be unexported
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Considering minor changes no issue is created.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Hello, I am trying to fix golint failures as we see them in the kubernetes-incubator/service-catalog project. I have separate PRs opened for lint issues related to other generator code which are in separate libraries like gengo. Thanks!
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
The exported or public functions requires a doc comment to pass golint.
This commit has changes of conversion generated code. The actual doc
changes are added into a separate commit for a clean review.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39803, 39698, 39537, 39478)
default a CSR's allowed usage to key encipherment and digital signing
Some pretty safe and sane defaults.
@liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39466, 39490, 39527)
bump gengo to latest
bumping gengo to limit surprises while working on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39475
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove ExportOptions from api/internal and use unversioned
Should only have one internal object in use
Part of #37530
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
