This changes the userspace proxy so that it cleans up its conntrack
settings when a service is removed (as the iptables proxy already
does). This could theoretically cause problems when a UDP service
as deleted and recreated quickly (with the same IP address). As
long as packets from the same UDP source IP and port were going to
the same destination IP and port, the the conntrack would apply and
the packets would be sent to the old destination.
This is astronomically unlikely if you did not specify the IP address
to use in the service, and even then, only happens with an "established"
UDP connection. However, in cases where a service could be "switched"
between using the iptables proxy and the userspace proxy, this case
becomes much more frequent.
This commit makes the userspace proxy keep an ObjectReference to the
service being proxied. This allows the consumers of the `ServiceInfo`
struct, like `ProxySockets` to emit events about or otherwise refer to
the service.
This commit adds a new method for constructing userspace proxiers,
`NewCustomProxier`. `NewCustomProxier` functions identically to
`NewProxier`, except that it allows a custom constructor method to
be passed in to construct instances of ProxySocket.
This commit makes it possible for the `ProxySocket` interface to be
implemented by types outside of the `userspace` package. It mainly just
exposes relevant types and fields as public.
This commit adds a method to the `LoadBalancer` interface in the
userspace proxy which allows consumers of the `LoadBalancer` to check if
it thinks a given service has endpoints available.
This makes it more obvious that they run together and makes the upcoming
rate-limited syncs easier.
Also make test use ints for ports, so it's easier to see when a port is
a literal value vs a name.
This is a weird function, but I didn't want to change any semantics
until the tests are in place. Testing exposed one bug where stale
connections of renamed ports were not marked stale.
There are other things that seem wrong here, more will follow.
Move the feature test to where we are activating the feature, rather
than where we detect locality. This is in service of better tests,
which is in service of less-frequent resyncing, which is going to
require refactoring.
Instead of copying the map, like OnServicesUpdate() used to do and which
was copied into buildServiceMap() to preserve semantics while creating
testcases, start with a new empty map and do deletion checking later.
The API docs say:
// ServiceTypeExternalName means a service consists of only a reference to
// an external name that kubedns or equivalent will return as a CNAME
// record, with no exposing or proxying of any pods involved.
which implies that ExternalName services should be ignored for proxy
purposes.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35884, 37305, 37369, 37429, 35679)
fix mixleading warning message regarding kube-proxy nodeIP initializa…
The current warning message implies that the operator should restart kube-proxy with some flag related to node IP which can be very misleading.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Cover port_allocator_test with more conditions
The test cases of port_allocator_test should cover more conditions, such as `rangeAllocator.used.Bit`.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Bug fix. Incoming UDP packets not reach newly deployed services
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Incoming UDP packets not reach newly deployed services when old connection's state in conntrack is not cleared. When a packet arrives, it will not go through NAT table again, because it is not "the first" packet. The PR fix the issue
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Fixes#31983
xref https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/8795
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/proxy
cc @thockin
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Change stickyMaxAge from seconds to minutes, fixes issue #35677
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Increases the service sessionAfinity time from 180 seconds to 180 minutes for proxy mode iptables which was a bug introduced in a refactor.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#35677
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
``` release-note
Fixed wrong service sessionAffinity stickiness time from 180 sec to 180 minutes in proxy mode iptables.
```
Since there is no test for the sessionAffinity feature at the moment I wanted to create one but I don't know how.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add Windows support to kube-proxy
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is the first stab at supporting kube-proxy (userspace mode) on Windows
**Which issue this PR fixes** :
fixes#30278
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The MVP uses `netsh portproxy` to redirect traffic from `ServiceIP:ServicePort` to a `LocalIP:LocalPort`.
For the next version we are expecting to have guidance from Microsoft Container Networking team.
**Limitations**:
Current implementation does not support DNS queries over UDP as `netsh portproxy` currently only supports TCP. We are working with Microsoft to remediate this.
cc: @brendandburns @dcbw
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add kubelet --network-plugin-mtu flag for MTU selection
* Add network-plugin-mtu option which lets us pass down a MTU to a network provider (currently processed by kubenet)
* Add a test, and thus make sysctl testable
