Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42177, 42176, 44721)
Job: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings Job into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
This ensures that Job does not fight with other controllers over control of Pods.
Ref: #24433
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Job controller now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods.
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42177, 42176, 44721)
CronJob: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings CronJob into compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
This ensures that other controllers do not fight over control of objects that a CronJob owns.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
CronJob controller now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting with other controllers.
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42272, 44696)
e2e test fix: Wait longer when first creating ELB
On any cloud (GCE or AWS), a lag between creating the LoadBalancer and
having it actually start serving traffic is expected. On AWS the lag is
larger, and we weren't correctly using the longer wait on our first
request.
Use a longer wait period on our first request.
Fix#44695
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
e2e: Prefer kubeconfig host to default
Previously it was necessary to pass ``-host`` to ``e2e.test`` even if ``-kubeconfig`` was specified since otherwise a localhost default would be used. This change ensures that the default is only used when kubeconfig is not set.
cc: @jayunit100
On any cloud (GCE or AWS), a lag between creating the LoadBalancer and
having it actually start serving traffic is expected. On AWS the lag is
larger, and we weren't correctly using the longer wait on our first
request.
Use a longer wait period on our first request.
Fix#44695
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43500, 44073)
[Federation] Add option to retrieve e2e cluster config from secrets
Previously the federation e2e setup was reading member cluster configuration from the test run's kubeconfig. This change removes that dependency in favor of reading member cluster configuration from secrets in the hosting cluster, and caches the configuration to avoid having to read it separately for each test.
cc: @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @perotinus
Add the option to configure e2e access to member clusters from the
same secrets in the host cluster used by the federation control plane.
The default behavior will continue to be sourcing this configuration
from the e2e kubeconfig. The optional behavior can be enabled by
passing --federation-config-from-cluster=true as an argument to
ginkgo.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40055, 42085, 44509, 44568, 43956)
improve error handling in e2e helpers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Changes most of the volume related helper funcs to return error rather than calling `Expect`. This is a better programming practice, is consistent with Go and Kubernetes, and allows helper funcs that create multiple resources to perform cleanup.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40055, 42085, 44509, 44568, 43956)
Change the default CLUSTER_IP_RANGE used by e2e
The existing choice intersects with the range reserved for auto
subnets and cannot be used with some GCP features.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44440, 44038, 44302, 44316, 43876)
Make resource gatherer get data about etcd resource usage in kubemark…
… setup
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44424, 44026, 43939, 44386, 42914)
Try in cluster config when input KubeConfig is empty
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Allows for downstream providers to run e2es "incluster" sans kubeconfig
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
/cc @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews @marun
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44406, 41543, 44071, 44374, 44299)
Decouple remotecommand
Refactored unversioned/remotecommand to decouple it from undesirable dependencies:
- term package now is not required, and functionality required to resize terminal size can be plugged in directly in kubectl
- in order to remove dependency on kubelet package - constants from kubelet/server/remotecommand were moved to separate util package (pkg/util/remotecommand)
- remotecommand_test.go moved to pkg/client/tests module
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44447, 44456, 43277, 41779, 43942)
Clean up pre-ControllerRef compatibility logic
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#43323
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add kubelet tests to verify host clean up
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Increasingly we're seeing more failures in persistent volume e2e tests where pv tests are run in parallel with disruptive tests. The quick solution is to tag the pv tests as Flaky. This pr addresses one cause of the flakiness and adds a disruptive kubelet test.
Once this pr is shown to not produce flakes the [Flaky] tag for the "HostCleanup" tests will be removed in a separate pr.
+ Adds volume tests to _kubelet.go_ motivated by issues [31272](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/31272) and [37657](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37657)
+ Addresses reverted pr [41178](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41178) and negates the need for pr [41229](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41229)
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Adds regression tests to cover issues: #31272 and #37657
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
It's possible that one of the new tests, which relies on the existence of _/usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd_ in the nfs-server pod, will not work in the GCI container env. If this turns out to be true then I will add a `SkipIfProviderIs("gke")` to the `It` block.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[e2e] Bump up pod deletion time for source pod IP test
From #44225.
Source pod IP e2e test is pretty flaky lately, and most of the failures seem to be timeout waiting for pod "kube-proxy-mode-detector" to disappear. Didn't found any other thing suspicious.
This PR bumps pod deletion timeout to DefaultPodDeletionTimeout, which is 3 minutes. Hopefully it will mitigate the flakes.
/assign @freehan
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adding load balancer src cidrs to GCE cloudprovider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As of January 31st, 2018, GCP will be sending health checks and l7 traffic from two CIDRs and legacy health checks from three CIDS. This PR moves them into the cloudprovider package and provides a flag for override.
Another PR will need to be address firewall rule creation for external L4 network loadbalancing #40778
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Step one of #40778
Step one of https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/197
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add flags to GCE cloud provider to override known L4/L7 proxy & health check source cidrs
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add test for provisioning with storage class
This PR re-introduces e2e test for dynamic provisioning with storage classes.
It adds the same test as it was merged in PR #32485 with an extra patch adding region to AWS calls. It works well on my AWS setup, however I'm using shared company account and I can't run kube-up.sh and run the tests in the "official" way.
@zmerlynn, can you please try to run tests that led to #34961?
@justinsb, you're my AWS guru, would there be a way how to introduce fully initialized AWS cloud provider into e2e test framework? It would simplify everything. GCE has it there, but it's easier to initialize, I guess. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/pd.go#L486 for example - IMO tests should not talk to AWS directly.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix wrong error return
Signed-off-by: Crazykev <crazykev@zju.edu.cn>
**What this PR does / why we need it**: The err return here is wrong, correct it.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41189, 43818)
Reduce deployment replicas in e2e tests
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41063
There are still two tests that run multiple replicas (testScaledRolloutDeployment, testIterativeDeployments), we may want to revisit them at some point.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Extract e2e utility code into framework
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There's a growing dependency on Volume e2e utilities related to creating / test against NFS volumes. For this reason, it's useful to relocate the relevant functions to the `framework` pkg. Doing so makes these utility functions available to e2e tests outside the `e2e` package.
This PR only moves code from the `e2e` package to `framework` and handle the relevant changes in calls. It does not change any logic.
```release-note
NONE
```
@jingxu97 I think there's value here in reducing duplicate code in the `common` package, given that these functions have been copied down to it. However, there's been some divergence. Can you PTAL and let me know if there's any reason we can't remove the duplicate `common` code?
cc @jeffvance
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44097, 42772, 43880, 44031, 44066)
[Federation] Improve e2e test setup
This PR improves federation e2e test setup:
- reuses e2e framework setup (``NewDefaultFramework``) instead of duplicating it
- ensures ``FederationAfterEach`` is called if an error occurs in ``FederationBeforeEach`` (as per the [example](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/framework/framework.go#L161) of the e2e framework)
- skips creation of a test namespace in the hosting cluster (not used for a federation e2e test)
cc: @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews
Moved remaining util functions
moved cinder specific function back to volumes.go, will have to be extracted later when a cinder e2e package is created.
remove dupe code from common/volume.go
Moved [Volume] tags to KubeDescribe
