In particular, we should not assume ControllerRefs are necessarily set.
However, we can still use ControllerRefs that do exist to avoid
interfering with controllers that do use it.
This effectively reverts the client-side changes in
cec3899b96.
We have to maintain the old behavior on the client side to support
version skew when talking to old servers that set the annotation.
However, the new server-side behavior is still to NOT set the
annotation.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Federation] Kubefed Init should use the right RBAC API version clientset
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Implements the need as described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41263
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41263
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@madhusudancs @shashidharatd @marun
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-bugs
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubectl: respect deployment strategy parameters for rollout status
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40496
`rollout status` now respects the strategy parameters for a RollingUpdate Deployment. This means that it will exit as soon as minimum availability is reached for a rollout (note that if you allow maximum availability, `rollout status` will succeed as soon as the new pods are created)
@janetkuo @AdoHe ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Output of `kubectl get` is inconsistent for pods
Builds on top of fixes from #42283, only the last two commits are new. Reverts behavior of #39042 which was inconsistent and confusing.
Fixes#15853
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41984, 41682, 41924, 41928)
make edit respect --save-config
New behavior:
edit:
1) the flag is set to true: it will create or update the last-applied-config annotation
2) the flag is set to false or is unspecified: NOP
replace:
1) If saveConfig is true, create or update the annotation.
2) If saveConfig is false and the local config file doesn't have the annotation, we save the annotation from the live object if there is one (Try to not surprise the users).
3) If saveConfig is false and the local config file has the annotation, we use the annotation in the config file.
4) Same behavior for force replacing
fixes#40626
```release-note
stop kubectl edit from updating the last-applied-configuration annotation when --save-config is unspecified or false.
```
@pwittrock @liggitt
This is a bug fix that prevented `edit` from being respected by `apply`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add apps/v1beta1 deployments with new defaults
This pull introduces deployments under `apps/v1beta1` and fixes#23597 and #23304.
TODO:
* [x] - create new type `apps/v1beta1.Deployment`
* [x] - update kubectl (stop, scale)
* [ ] - ~~new `kubectl run` generator~~ - this will only duplicate half of generator code, I suggest replacing current to use new endpoint
* [ ] - ~~create extended tests~~ - I've added integration and cmd tests verifying new endpoints
* [ ] - ~~create `hack/test-update-storage-objects.sh`~~ - see above
This is currently blocked by https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38071, due to conflicting name `v1beta1.Deployment`.
```release-note
Introduce apps/v1beta1.Deployments resource with modified defaults compared to extensions/v1beta1.Deployments.
```
@kargakis @mfojtik @kubernetes/sig-apps-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42316, 41618, 42201, 42113, 42191)
Make 'docker-email' optional on dockercfg secrets
It is not required for most username/password registries.
Fixes#41727
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Prevent caching empty discovery docs
If kubectl makes requests before a server fully initialized, it could cache bad discovery responses (results of a partially forbidden discovery call, etc)
This changes to only cache responses that included at least one group or resource so that total failure doesn't get cached for 5 minutes
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38676, 41765, 42103, 41833, 41702)
Support --context flag completion for kubectl
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
With this PR, `--context` flag completion is supported for kubectl.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41597, 42185, 42075, 42178, 41705)
Honor output formats in kubectl patch
Currently, output formats other than `-o name` are only honored when in `--local` mode.
This PR also prints the result from the server when in regular mode
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42162, 41973, 42015, 42115, 41923)
kubectl drain: make code reusable
DrainOptions requires a few fields to be set, and the expectation is
that these are set as part of construction of the object. If they are
set, then the drain code can be reused in other kubernetes projects.
This does not create a contract that DrainOptions should fulfill going
forwards, any more than any of the other types that happen to be exposed
are part of the contract. Instead, this merely makes use outside the
package possible.
```release-note
NONE
```
Add tracking on resource.Builder if a "named" item is requested (from
file, stream, url, or resource args) and use that in `get` to accurately
determine whether to filter resources. Add tests.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40746, 41699, 42108, 42174, 42093)
Output result of apply operation
Fixes#41690
Plumbs the resulting object from patch operations back to the top level so it can be output when printing
Automatic merge from submit-queue
numeric ordering of kubectl outputs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Instead of having kubectl listing the pods in a alphabetical way:
foobar-1-build
foobar-10-build
foobar-2-build
foobar-3-build
With the parameter --sort-by '{.metadata.name}' it now gives:
foobar-1-build
foobar-2-build
foobar-3-build
foobar-10-build
**Which issue this PR fixes**
https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/7229
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have followed the dependencies requirements from https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/godep.md
**Release note**:
```release-note
Import a natural sorting library and use it in the sorting printer.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
Add a unit test for idempotent applys to the TPR entries.
The test in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
The apply operation expects a last-modified-configuration annotation.
That is written verbatim in the test/fixture file.
References #40841
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds one unit test for TPR's using applies.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
References:
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/95https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40841#issue-204769102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I am not super proud of the tpr-entry name.
But I feel like we need to call the two objects differently.
The one which has Kind:ThirdPartyResource
and the one has Kind:Foo.
Is the name "ThirdPartyResource" used interchangeably for both ? I used tpr-entry for the Kind:Foo object.
Also I !assume! this is testing an idempotent apply because the last-applied-configuration annotation is the same as the object itself.
This is the state I see in the logs of kubectl if I do a proper idempotent apply of a third party resource entry.
I guess I will know more once I start playing around with apply command that change TPR objects.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
