Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44440, 44038, 44302, 44316, 43876)
Make resource gatherer get data about etcd resource usage in kubemark…
… setup
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44424, 44026, 43939, 44386, 42914)
Try in cluster config when input KubeConfig is empty
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Allows for downstream providers to run e2es "incluster" sans kubeconfig
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
/cc @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews @marun
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44406, 41543, 44071, 44374, 44299)
Decouple remotecommand
Refactored unversioned/remotecommand to decouple it from undesirable dependencies:
- term package now is not required, and functionality required to resize terminal size can be plugged in directly in kubectl
- in order to remove dependency on kubelet package - constants from kubelet/server/remotecommand were moved to separate util package (pkg/util/remotecommand)
- remotecommand_test.go moved to pkg/client/tests module
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44447, 44456, 43277, 41779, 43942)
Clean up pre-ControllerRef compatibility logic
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#43323
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add kubelet tests to verify host clean up
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Increasingly we're seeing more failures in persistent volume e2e tests where pv tests are run in parallel with disruptive tests. The quick solution is to tag the pv tests as Flaky. This pr addresses one cause of the flakiness and adds a disruptive kubelet test.
Once this pr is shown to not produce flakes the [Flaky] tag for the "HostCleanup" tests will be removed in a separate pr.
+ Adds volume tests to _kubelet.go_ motivated by issues [31272](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/31272) and [37657](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37657)
+ Addresses reverted pr [41178](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41178) and negates the need for pr [41229](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41229)
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Adds regression tests to cover issues: #31272 and #37657
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
It's possible that one of the new tests, which relies on the existence of _/usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd_ in the nfs-server pod, will not work in the GCI container env. If this turns out to be true then I will add a `SkipIfProviderIs("gke")` to the `It` block.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[e2e] Bump up pod deletion time for source pod IP test
From #44225.
Source pod IP e2e test is pretty flaky lately, and most of the failures seem to be timeout waiting for pod "kube-proxy-mode-detector" to disappear. Didn't found any other thing suspicious.
This PR bumps pod deletion timeout to DefaultPodDeletionTimeout, which is 3 minutes. Hopefully it will mitigate the flakes.
/assign @freehan
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adding load balancer src cidrs to GCE cloudprovider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As of January 31st, 2018, GCP will be sending health checks and l7 traffic from two CIDRs and legacy health checks from three CIDS. This PR moves them into the cloudprovider package and provides a flag for override.
Another PR will need to be address firewall rule creation for external L4 network loadbalancing #40778
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Step one of #40778
Step one of https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/197
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add flags to GCE cloud provider to override known L4/L7 proxy & health check source cidrs
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add test for provisioning with storage class
This PR re-introduces e2e test for dynamic provisioning with storage classes.
It adds the same test as it was merged in PR #32485 with an extra patch adding region to AWS calls. It works well on my AWS setup, however I'm using shared company account and I can't run kube-up.sh and run the tests in the "official" way.
@zmerlynn, can you please try to run tests that led to #34961?
@justinsb, you're my AWS guru, would there be a way how to introduce fully initialized AWS cloud provider into e2e test framework? It would simplify everything. GCE has it there, but it's easier to initialize, I guess. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/pd.go#L486 for example - IMO tests should not talk to AWS directly.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix wrong error return
Signed-off-by: Crazykev <crazykev@zju.edu.cn>
**What this PR does / why we need it**: The err return here is wrong, correct it.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41189, 43818)
Reduce deployment replicas in e2e tests
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41063
There are still two tests that run multiple replicas (testScaledRolloutDeployment, testIterativeDeployments), we may want to revisit them at some point.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Extract e2e utility code into framework
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There's a growing dependency on Volume e2e utilities related to creating / test against NFS volumes. For this reason, it's useful to relocate the relevant functions to the `framework` pkg. Doing so makes these utility functions available to e2e tests outside the `e2e` package.
This PR only moves code from the `e2e` package to `framework` and handle the relevant changes in calls. It does not change any logic.
```release-note
NONE
```
@jingxu97 I think there's value here in reducing duplicate code in the `common` package, given that these functions have been copied down to it. However, there's been some divergence. Can you PTAL and let me know if there's any reason we can't remove the duplicate `common` code?
cc @jeffvance
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44097, 42772, 43880, 44031, 44066)
[Federation] Improve e2e test setup
This PR improves federation e2e test setup:
- reuses e2e framework setup (``NewDefaultFramework``) instead of duplicating it
- ensures ``FederationAfterEach`` is called if an error occurs in ``FederationBeforeEach`` (as per the [example](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/framework/framework.go#L161) of the e2e framework)
- skips creation of a test namespace in the hosting cluster (not used for a federation e2e test)
cc: @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews
Moved remaining util functions
moved cinder specific function back to volumes.go, will have to be extracted later when a cinder e2e package is created.
remove dupe code from common/volume.go
Moved [Volume] tags to KubeDescribe
Automatic merge from submit-queue
test/e2e_node: prepull images with CRI
Part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40739
- This PR builds on top of #40525 (and contains one commit from #40525)
- The second commit contains a tiny change in the `Makefile`.
- Third commit is a patch to be able to prepull images using the CRI (as opposed to run `docker` to pull images which doesn't make sense if you're using CRI most of the times)
Marked WIP till #40525 makes its way into master
@Random-Liu @lucab @yujuhong @mrunalp @rhatdan
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42667, 43923)
Adding test to perform volume operations storm
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adding new test to perform volume operations storm
Test Steps
1. Create storage class for thin Provisioning.
2. Create 30 PVCs using above storage class in annotation, requesting 2 GB files.
3. Wait until all disks are ready and all PVs and PVCs get bind. (**CreateVolume** storm)
4. Create pod to mount volumes using PVCs created in step 2. (**AttachDisk** storm)
5. Wait for pod status to be running.
6. Verify all volumes accessible and available in the pod.
7. Delete pod.
8. wait until volumes gets detached. (**DetachDisk** storm)
9. Delete all PVCs. This should delete all Disks. (**DeleteVolume** storm)
10. Delete storage class.
This test will help validate issue reported at https://github.com/vmware/kubernetes/issues/71
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
executed test on 1.5.3 release with `VOLUME_OPS_SCALE` set to `5`
Will execute test with the changes made on PR - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42422, with the `VOLUME_OPS_SCALE` set to `30`
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
cc: @abrarshivani @BaluDontu @tusharnt @pdhamdhere @luomiao @kerneltime
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42617, 43247, 43509, 43644, 43820)
Adding a SSH tunnel check to GKE upgrades
**What this PR does / why we need it**: After an upgrade, it takes some time fore the master to re-establish SSH tunnels to the nodes. This adds a wait for GKE since it runs in this configuration.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#43611, #43612
Comments, log lines, exported MakePersistentVolume
Moved pv/pvcConfig assignment out of diskName check, nil ptrs and configs afterEach
change label/selector code to use k8s defined types from generic string:string maps
adjust for gce refactor
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41728, 42231)
Adding new tests to e2e/vsphere_volume_placement.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adding new tests to e2e/vsphere_volume_placement.go
Below is the tests description and test steps.
**Test Back-to-back pod creation/deletion with different volume sources on the same worker node**
1. Create volumes - vmdk2, vmdk1 is created in the test setup.
2. Create pod Spec - pod-SpecA with volume path of vmdk1 and NodeSelector set to label assigned to node1.
3. Create pod Spec - pod-SpecB with volume path of vmdk2 and NodeSelector set to label assigned to node1.
4. Create pod-A using pod-SpecA and wait for pod to become ready.
5. Create pod-B using pod-SpecB and wait for POD to become ready.
6. Verify volumes are attached to the node.
7. Create empty file on the volume to make sure volume is accessible. (Perform this step on pod-A and pod-B)
8. Verify file created in step 5 is present on the volume. (perform this step on pod-A and pod-B)
9. Delete pod-A and pod-B
10. Repeatedly (5 times) perform step 4 to 9 and verify associated volume's content is matching.
11. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
12. Delete vmdk1 and vmdk2
**Test multiple volumes from different datastore within the same pod**
1. Create volumes - vmdk2 on non default shared datastore.
2. Create pod Spec with volume path of vmdk1 (vmdk1 is created in test setup on default datastore) and vmdk2.
3. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
4. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which pod are created. Write some data to make sure volume are accessible.
5. Delete pod.
6. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
7. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
8. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which PODs are created. Verify volume contents are matching with the content written in step 4.
9. Delete POD.
10. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
11. Delete vmdk1 and vmdk2
**Test multiple volumes from same datastore within the same pod**
1. Create volumes - vmdk2, vmdk1 is created in testsetup
2. Create pod Spec with volume path of vmdk1 (vmdk1 is created in test setup) and vmdk2.
3. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
4. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which pod are created. Write some data to make sure volume are accessible.
5. Delete pod.
6. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
7. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
8. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which PODs are created. Verify volume contents are matching with the content written in step 4.
9. Delete POD.
10. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
11. Delete vmdk1 and vmdk2
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Executed tests against K8S v1.5.3 release
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc: @kerneltime @abrarshivani @BaluDontu @tusharnt @pdhamdhere
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42237, 42297, 42279, 42436, 42551)
Cleanup federation_util.go in e2e/framework
The only function GetValidDNSSubdomainName in test/e2e/framework/federation_util.go is no longer used for some time now. so cleaning it up.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @madhusudancs
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42237, 42297, 42279, 42436, 42551)
Reword PVC polling message to log a more readable message.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Previous message used to report an error is misleading and poorly written. This PR changes the log to be more readable.
```release-note
NONE
```
