Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44424, 44026, 43939, 44386, 42914)
Try in cluster config when input KubeConfig is empty
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Allows for downstream providers to run e2es "incluster" sans kubeconfig
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
/cc @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews @marun
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44447, 44456, 43277, 41779, 43942)
Clean up pre-ControllerRef compatibility logic
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#43323
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix wrong error return
Signed-off-by: Crazykev <crazykev@zju.edu.cn>
**What this PR does / why we need it**: The err return here is wrong, correct it.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41728, 42231)
Adding new tests to e2e/vsphere_volume_placement.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adding new tests to e2e/vsphere_volume_placement.go
Below is the tests description and test steps.
**Test Back-to-back pod creation/deletion with different volume sources on the same worker node**
1. Create volumes - vmdk2, vmdk1 is created in the test setup.
2. Create pod Spec - pod-SpecA with volume path of vmdk1 and NodeSelector set to label assigned to node1.
3. Create pod Spec - pod-SpecB with volume path of vmdk2 and NodeSelector set to label assigned to node1.
4. Create pod-A using pod-SpecA and wait for pod to become ready.
5. Create pod-B using pod-SpecB and wait for POD to become ready.
6. Verify volumes are attached to the node.
7. Create empty file on the volume to make sure volume is accessible. (Perform this step on pod-A and pod-B)
8. Verify file created in step 5 is present on the volume. (perform this step on pod-A and pod-B)
9. Delete pod-A and pod-B
10. Repeatedly (5 times) perform step 4 to 9 and verify associated volume's content is matching.
11. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
12. Delete vmdk1 and vmdk2
**Test multiple volumes from different datastore within the same pod**
1. Create volumes - vmdk2 on non default shared datastore.
2. Create pod Spec with volume path of vmdk1 (vmdk1 is created in test setup on default datastore) and vmdk2.
3. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
4. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which pod are created. Write some data to make sure volume are accessible.
5. Delete pod.
6. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
7. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
8. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which PODs are created. Verify volume contents are matching with the content written in step 4.
9. Delete POD.
10. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
11. Delete vmdk1 and vmdk2
**Test multiple volumes from same datastore within the same pod**
1. Create volumes - vmdk2, vmdk1 is created in testsetup
2. Create pod Spec with volume path of vmdk1 (vmdk1 is created in test setup) and vmdk2.
3. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
4. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which pod are created. Write some data to make sure volume are accessible.
5. Delete pod.
6. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
7. Create pod using spec created in step-2 and wait for pod to become ready.
8. Verify both volumes are attached to the node on which PODs are created. Verify volume contents are matching with the content written in step 4.
9. Delete POD.
10. Wait for vmdk1 and vmdk2 to be detached from node.
11. Delete vmdk1 and vmdk2
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Executed tests against K8S v1.5.3 release
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc: @kerneltime @abrarshivani @BaluDontu @tusharnt @pdhamdhere
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42237, 42297, 42279, 42436, 42551)
Reword PVC polling message to log a more readable message.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Previous message used to report an error is misleading and poorly written. This PR changes the log to be more readable.
```release-note
NONE
```
In particular, we should not assume ControllerRefs are necessarily set.
However, we can still use ControllerRefs that do exist to avoid
interfering with controllers that do use it.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix Deployment upgrade test.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When the upgrade test operates on Deployments in a pre-1.6 cluster (i.e. during the Setup phase), it needs to use the v1.5 deployment/util logic. In particular, the v1.5 logic does not filter children to only those with a matching ControllerRef.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#42738
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
When the upgrade test operates on Deployments in a pre-1.6 cluster
(i.e. during the Setup phase), it needs to use the v1.5 deployment/util
logic. In particular, the v1.5 logic does not filter children to only
those with a matching ControllerRef.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
e2e test: Log container output on TestContainerOutput error
When a pod started with TestContainerOutput or TestContainerOutputRegexp
fails from unknown reason, we should log all output of all its containers
so we can analyze what went wrong.
This would help us to see what wrong in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40811 - a container is running there for 3 minutes and dies and we want to see what it did for these 3 minutes.
```release-note
NONE
```
When a pod started with TestContainerOutput or TestContainerOutputRegexp
fails from unknown reason, we should log all output of all its containers
so we can analyze what went wrong.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42652, 42681, 42708, 42730)
e2e: fix restarting the apiserver
The string used to match the image name of the apiserver (e.g., `gcr.io/google_containers/kube-apiserver:3be...`),
but this no longer works. Change the test to locate the kube-apiserver container by name.
The list functions in deployment/util are used outside the Deployment
controller itself. Therefore, they don't do actual adoption/orphaning.
However, they still need to avoid listing things that don't belong.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38957, 41819, 41851, 40667, 41373)
Move pvutil.go from e2e package to framework package
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR moves pvutil.go to the e2e/framework package.
I am working on a PV upgrade test, and would like to use some of the wrapper functions in pvutil.go. However, the upgrade test is in the upgrade package, and not the e2e package, and it cannot import the e2e package because it would create a circular dependency. So pvutil.go needs to be moved out of e2e in order to break the circular dependency. This is a refactoring name change, no logic has been modified.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41421, 41440, 36765, 41722)
Use watch param instead of deprecated /watch/ prefix
Switches clients to use watch param instead of /watch/ prefix
```release-note
Clients now use the `?watch=true` parameter to make watch API calls, instead of the `/watch/` path prefix
```
