Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39803, 39698, 39537, 39478)
[scheduling] Moved pod affinity and anti-affinity from annotations to api fields #25319
Converted pod affinity and anti-affinity from annotations to api fields
Related: #25319
Related: #34508
**Release note**:
```Pod affinity and anti-affinity has moved from annotations to api fields in the pod spec. Pod affinity or anti-affinity that is defined in the annotations will be ignored.```
Recent changes to support multiple methods for discovery meant that
"kubeadm init" no longer was sufficient and users would need to add
"--discovery token://" to achieve the same results.
Instead lets assume discovery if the user does not specify anything else
to maintain parity and the brevity of our original instructions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/api
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
change all PredicateFunc to use SelectionPredicate
What?
- This PR changes all PredicateFunc in registry to return SelectionPredicate instead of Matcher interface.
Why?
- We want to pass SelectionPredicate to storage layer. Matcher interface did not expose enough information for indexing.
This implements the proposal in:
docs/proposals/secret-configmap-downwarapi-file-mode.md
Fixes: #28317.
The mounttest image is updated so it returns the permissions of the linked file
and not the symlink itself.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refactor persistent volume controller
Here is complete persistent controller as designed in https://github.com/pmorie/pv-haxxz/blob/master/controller.go
It's feature complete and compatible with current binder/recycler/provisioner. No new features, it *should* be much more stable and predictable.
Testing
--
The unit test framework is quite complicated, still it was necessary to reach reasonable coverage (78% in `persistentvolume_controller.go`). The untested part are error cases, which are quite hard to test in reasonable way - sure, I can inject a VersionConflictError on any object update and check the error bubbles up to appropriate places, but the real test would be to run `syncClaim`/`syncVolume` again and check it recovers appropriately from the error in the next periodic sync. That's the hard part.
Organization
---
The PR starts with `rm -rf kubernetes/pkg/controller/persistentvolume`. I find it easier to read when I see only the new controller without old pieces scattered around.
[`types.go` from the old controller is reused to speed up matching a bit, the code looks solid and has 95% unit test coverage].
I tried to split the PR into smaller patches, let me know what you think.
~~TODO~~
--
* ~~Missing: provisioning, recycling~~.
* ~~Fix integration tests~~
* ~~Fix e2e tests~~
@kubernetes/sig-storage
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/24331)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes#15632
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move internal types of hpa from pkg/apis/extensions to pkg/apis/autoscaling
ref #21577
@lavalamp could you please review or delegate to someone from CSI team?
@janetkuo could you please take a look into the kubelet changes?
cc @fgrzadkowski @jszczepkowski @mwielgus @kubernetes/autoscaling
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubelet: Cleanup with new engine api
Finish step 2 of #23563
This PR:
1) Cleanup go-dockerclient reference in the code.
2) Bump up the engine-api version.
3) Cleanup the code with new engine-api.
Fixes#24076.
Fixes#23809.
/cc @yujuhong
