The custom progress reporter gets invoked via ginkgo.ReportAfterEach after each
test. The problem was that the e2e framework unconditionally enables Ginkgo's
-progress output which shows execution of all nodes, including this
ReportAfterEach. The effect were over 1000 lines of useless output at the start
of a test run while skipping disabled tests.
The solution is to tell Ginkgo that the ReportAfterEach isn't meant to be
reported.
This change updates TestAggregatedAPIServer and the related test
server wiring to exercise the full network path between the Kube API
server and the aggregated API server. We now assert that the wardle
API service and Kube API server discovery endpoints are fully healthy.
CRUD operations are performed through the Kube API server to the
wardle API server.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@microsoft.com>
The WaitFor* refactoring in 07c34eb400 had an oversight what timeout parameter
is used for calling WaitForAllPodsCondition() in WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady()
so the calls to WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady() ended up ignoring the user
provided timeout. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@intel.com>
Followup on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/111846. This
particular test was left out from that PR because once it was enabled it
started failing. It was desired to merge
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/111846 irrespective of
this particular test.
The failure in the test was caused due to the
`createFSGroupRequestPreHook` mock CSI driver hook function assuming
that the request object passed to it is an instance of the respective
struct, but it's actually a pointer instead. This resulted in the hook
function not fulfilling its purpose, and the so the test failed.
Fixes instances of #98213 (to ultimately complete #98213 linting is
required).
This commit fixes a few instances of a common mistake done when writing
parallel subtests or Ginkgo tests (basically any test in which the test
closure is dynamically created in a loop and the loop doesn't wait for
the test closure to complete).
I'm developing a very specific linter that detects this king of mistake
and these are the only violations of it it found in this repo (it's not
airtight so there may be more).
In the case of Ginkgo tests, without this fix, only the last entry in
the loop iteratee is actually tested. In the case of Parallel tests I
think it's the same problem but maybe a bit different, iiuc it depends
on the execution speed.
Waiting for the CI to confirm the tests are still passing, even after
this fix - since it's likely it's the first time those test cases are
executed - they may be buggy or testing code that is buggy.
Another instance of this is in `test/e2e/storage/csi_mock_volume.go` and
is still failing so it has been left out of this commit and will be
addressed in a separate one
The main purpose of this change is to update the e2e Netpol tests to use
the srandard CreateNamespace function from the Framework. Before this
change, a custom Namespace creation function was used, with the
following consequences:
* Pod security admission settings had to be enforced locally (not using
the centralized mechanism)
* the custom function was brittle, not waiting for default Namespace
ServiceAccount creation, causing tests to fail in some infrastructures
* tests were not benefiting from standard framework capabilities:
Namespace name generation, automatic Namespace deletion, etc.
As part of this change, we also do the following:
* clearly decouple responsibilities between the Model, which defines the
K8s objects to be created, and the KubeManager, which has access to
runtime information (actual Namespace names after their creation by
the framework, Service IPs, etc.)
* simplify / clean-up tests and remove as much unneeded logic / funtions
as possible for easier long-term maintenance
* remove the useFixedNamespaces compile-time constant switch, which
aimed at re-using existing K8s resources across test cases. The
reasons: a) it is currently broken as setting it to true causes most
tests to panic on the master branch, b) it is not a good idea to have
some switch like this which changes the behavior of the tests and is
never exercised in CI, c) it cannot possibly work as different test
cases have different Model requirements (e.g., the protocols list can
differ) and hence different K8s resource requirements.
For #108298
Signed-off-by: Antonin Bas <abas@vmware.com>
