The runtime classes are apiserver's concept, while the handlers are kubelet's concept.
For NodeStatus, it makes more sense to return the latter ones here.
This commit modifies the following files:
- pkg/apis/core/types.go
- staging/src/k8s.io/api/core/v1/types.go
- pkg/kubelet/nodestatus/setters.go
- pkg/kubelet/kubelet_node_status.go
- pkg/registry/core/node/strategy.go
- test/e2e_node/mount_rro_linux_test.go
Other changes were auto-generated by running `make update`.
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
This commit modifies the following files:
- pkg/apis/core/types.go
- staging/src/k8s.io/api/core/v1/types.go
Other changes were auto-generated by running `make update`.
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
* Add FeatureGate PodHostIPs
* Add HostIPs field and update PodIPs field
* Types conversion
* Add dropDisabledStatusFields
* Add HostIPs for kubelet
* Add fuzzer for PodStatus
* Add status.hostIPs in ConvertDownwardAPIFieldLabel
* Add status.hostIPs in validEnvDownwardAPIFieldPathExpressions
* Downward API support for status.hostIPs
* Add DownwardAPI validation for status.hostIPs
* Add e2e to check that hostIPs works
* Add e2e to check that Downward API works
* Regenerate
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
Modify the behavior of the AnyVolumeDataSource alpha feature gate to enable
a new field, DataSourceRef, rather than modifying the behavior of the
existing DataSource field. This allows addition Volume Populators in a way
that doesn't risk breaking backwards compatibility, although it will
result in eventually deprecating the DataSource field.
1. Add API definitions;
2. Add feature gate and drops the field when feature gate is not on;
3. Set default values for the field;
4. Add API Validation
5. add kube-proxy iptables and ipvs implementations
6. add tests
