1. Do not describe port type in message because lp.String() already has the
information.
2. Remove duplicate error detail from event log.
Previous log is like this.
47s Warning listen tcp4 :30764: socket: too many open files node/127.0.0.1 can't open port "nodePort for default/temp-svc:834" (:30764/tcp4), skipping it: listen tcp4 :30764: socket: too many open files
[issue]
When creating a NodePort service with the kubectl create command, the NodePort
assignment may fail.
Failure to assign a NodePort can be simulated with the following malicious
command[1].
$ kubectl create service nodeport temp-svc --tcp=`python3 <<EOF
print("1", end="")
for i in range(2, 1026):
print("," + str(i), end="")
EOF
`
The command succeeds and shows following output.
service/temp-svc created
The service has been successfully generated and can also be referenced with the
get command.
$ kubectl get svc
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S)
temp-svc NodePort 10.0.0.139 <none> 1:31335/TCP,2:32367/TCP,3:30263/TCP,(omitted),1023:31821/TCP,1024:32475/TCP,1025:30311/TCP 12s
The user does not recognize failure to assign a NodePort because
create/get/describe command does not show any error. This is the issue.
[solution]
Users can notice errors by looking at the kube-proxy logs, but it may be difficult to see the kube-proxy logs of all nodes.
E0327 08:50:10.216571 660960 proxier.go:1286] "can't open port, skipping this nodePort" err="listen tcp4 :30641: socket: too many open files" port="\"nodePort for default/temp-svc:744\" (:30641/tcp4)"
E0327 08:50:10.216611 660960 proxier.go:1286] "can't open port, skipping this nodePort" err="listen tcp4 :30827: socket: too many open files" port="\"nodePort for default/temp-svc:857\" (:30827/tcp4)"
...
E0327 08:50:10.217119 660960 proxier.go:1286] "can't open port, skipping this nodePort" err="listen tcp4 :32484: socket: too many open files" port="\"nodePort for default/temp-svc:805\" (:32484/tcp4)"
E0327 08:50:10.217293 660960 proxier.go:1612] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err="pipe2: too many open files ()"
I0327 08:50:10.217341 660960 proxier.go:1615] "Closing local ports after iptables-restore failure"
So, this patch will fire an event when NodePort assignment fails.
In fact, when the externalIP assignment fails, it is also notified by event.
The event will be displayed like this.
$ kubectl get event
LAST SEEN TYPE REASON OBJECT MESSAGE
...
2s Warning listen tcp4 :31055: socket: too many open files node/127.0.0.1 can't open "nodePort for default/temp-svc:901" (:31055/tcp4), skipping this nodePort: listen tcp4 :31055: socket: too many open files
2s Warning listen tcp4 :31422: socket: too many open files node/127.0.0.1 can't open "nodePort for default/temp-svc:474" (:31422/tcp4), skipping this nodePort: listen tcp4 :31422: socket: too many open files
...
This PR fixes iptables and ipvs proxier.
Since userspace proxier does not seem to be affected by this issue, it is not fixed.
[1] Assume that fd limit is 1024(default).
$ ulimit -n
1024
1. Add API definitions;
2. Add feature gate and drops the field when feature gate is not on;
3. Set default values for the field;
4. Add API Validation
5. add kube-proxy iptables and ipvs implementations
6. add tests
1. For iptables mode, add KUBE-NODEPORTS chain in filter table. Add
rules to allow healthcheck node port traffic.
2. For ipvs mode, add KUBE-NODE-PORT chain in filter table. Add
KUBE-HEALTH-CHECK-NODE-PORT ipset to allow traffic to healthcheck
node port.
When running in ipvs mode, kube-proxy generated wrong iptables-restore
input because the chain names are hardcoded.
It also fixed a typo in method name.
* api: structure change
* api: defaulting, conversion, and validation
* [FIX] validation: auto remove second ip/family when service changes to SingleStack
* [FIX] api: defaulting, conversion, and validation
* api-server: clusterIPs alloc, printers, storage and strategy
* [FIX] clusterIPs default on read
* alloc: auto remove second ip/family when service changes to SingleStack
* api-server: repair loop handling for clusterIPs
* api-server: force kubernetes default service into single stack
* api-server: tie dualstack feature flag with endpoint feature flag
* controller-manager: feature flag, endpoint, and endpointSlice controllers handling multi family service
* [FIX] controller-manager: feature flag, endpoint, and endpointSlicecontrollers handling multi family service
* kube-proxy: feature-flag, utils, proxier, and meta proxier
* [FIX] kubeproxy: call both proxier at the same time
* kubenet: remove forced pod IP sorting
* kubectl: modify describe to include ClusterIPs, IPFamilies, and IPFamilyPolicy
* e2e: fix tests that depends on IPFamily field AND add dual stack tests
* e2e: fix expected error message for ClusterIP immutability
* add integration tests for dualstack
the third phase of dual stack is a very complex change in the API,
basically it introduces Dual Stack services. Main changes are:
- It pluralizes the Service IPFamily field to IPFamilies,
and removes the singular field.
- It introduces a new field IPFamilyPolicyType that can take
3 values to express the "dual-stack(mad)ness" of the cluster:
SingleStack, PreferDualStack and RequireDualStack
- It pluralizes ClusterIP to ClusterIPs.
The goal is to add coverage to the services API operations,
taking into account the 6 different modes a cluster can have:
- single stack: IP4 or IPv6 (as of today)
- dual stack: IPv4 only, IPv6 only, IPv4 - IPv6, IPv6 - IPv4
* [FIX] add integration tests for dualstack
* generated data
* generated files
Co-authored-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@redhat.com>
Masquerade de traffic that loops back to the originator
before they hit the kubernetes-specific postrouting rules
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com>
It seems that if you set the packet mark on a packet and then route
that packet through a kernel VXLAN interface, the VXLAN-encapsulated
packet will still have the mark from the original packet. Since our
NAT rules are based on the packet mark, this was causing us to
double-NAT some packets, which then triggered a kernel checksumming
bug. But even without the checksum bug, there are reasons to avoid
double-NATting, so fix the rules to unmark the packets before
masquerading them.
