Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow setting permission mode bits on secrets, configmaps and downwardAPI files
cc @thockin @pmorie
Here is the first round to implement: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/28733.
I made two commits: one with the actual change and the other with the auto-generated code. I think it's easier to review this way, but let me know if you prefer in some other way.
I haven't written any tests yet, I wanted to have a first glance and not write them till this (and the API) are more close to the "LGTM" :)
There are some things:
* I'm not sure where to do the "AND 0777". I'll try to look better in the code base, but suggestions are always welcome :)
* The write permission on group and others is not set when you do an `ls -l` on the running container. It does work with write permissions to the owner. Debugging seems to show that is something happening after this is correctly set on creation. Will look closer.
* The default permission (when the new fields are not specified) are the same that on kubernetes v1.3
* I do realize there are conflicts with master, but I think this is good enough to have a look. The conflicts is with the autog-enerated code, so the actual code is actually the same (and it takes like ~30 minutes to generate it here)
* I didn't generate the docs (`generated-docs` and `generated-swagger-docs` from `hack/update-all.sh`) because my machine runs out of mem. So that's why it isn't in this first PR, will try to investigate and see why it happens.
Other than that, this works fine here with some silly scripts I did to create a secret&configmap&downwardAPI, a pod and check the file permissions. Tested the "defaultMode" and "mode" for all. But of course, will write tests once this is looking fine :)
Thanks a lot again!
Rodrigo
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove incorrect docs about unset fields in NetworkPolicyPeer
While hammering out the semantics of not-present vs present-but-empty, we appear to have added incorrect clarifications to NetworkPolicyPeer, where the semantics of PodSelector not being present is supposed to be "do what NamespaceSelector" says, not "select no pods", and likewise with NamespaceSelector not being present.
I think it's clearest if we just don't say anything, since we already said "Exactly one of the following must be specified" above. Alternatively we could be redundant and say "(If not provided, then NamespaceSelector must be set.)" or something like that.
@caseydavenport @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue
re-organize development.md
Addresses issue #13876; reorganizes and cleans up parts of development.md; splits out the godep section for managing `vendor/` tree dependencies into a new godep.md file.
```release-note
The developer guide has been reorganized to facilitate the majority of new developers working on Kubernetes.
```
Signed-off-by: Mike Brown <brownwm@us.ibm.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add NodeName to EndpointAddress object
Adding a new string type `nodeName` to api.EndpointAddress.
We could also do *ObjectReference to the api.Node object instead, which would be more precise for the future.
```
type ObjectReference struct {
Kind string `json:"kind,omitempty"`
Namespace string `json:"namespace,omitempty"`
Name string `json:"name,omitempty"`
UID types.UID `json:"uid,omitempty"`
APIVersion string `json:"apiVersion,omitempty"`
ResourceVersion string `json:"resourceVersion,omitempty"`
// Optional. If referring to a piece of an object instead of an entire object, this string
// should contain information to identify the sub-object. For example, if the object
// reference is to a container within a pod, this would take on a value like:
// "spec.containers{name}" (where "name" refers to the name of the container that triggered
// the event) or if no container name is specified "spec.containers[2]" (container with
// index 2 in this pod). This syntax is chosen only to have some well-defined way of
// referencing a part of an object.
// TODO: this design is not final and this field is subject to change in the future.
FieldPath string `json:"fieldPath,omitempty"`
}
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
docs/proposal: add proposal for kubectl login
This PR updates https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/32 and https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/25758 by adding a proposal for a "kubectl login" command.
It's a bit more involved than the implementation discussed with @deads2k in #25758, by proposing a long term goal for the overall subcommand.
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth @kubernetes/kubectl
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement 'kubectl top' command
```release-note
Added 'kubectl top' command showing the resource usage metrics.
```
Sample output:
Nodes:
```
$ kubectl top node
NAME CPU MEMORY STORAGE TIMESTAMP
kubernetes-minion-group-xxxx 76m 1468 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:37:00 +0200
kubernetes-minion-group-yyyy 73m 1511 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:37:00 +0200
kubernetes-minion-group-zzzz 46m 1506 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:37:00 +0200
kubernetes-master 76m 2059 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:37:00 +0200
```
Pods in all namespaces:
```
$ kubectl top pod --all-namespaces
NAMESPACE NAME CPU MEMORY STORAGE TIMESTAMP
default nginx-1111111111-zzzzz 0m 1 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:49:00 +0200
kube-system etcd-server-kubernetes-master 4m 116 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:49:00 +0200
kube-system fluentd-cloud-logging-kubernetes-minion-group-xxxx 14m 110 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:49:00 +0200
kube-system kube-dns-v18-zzzzz 1m 6 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:49:00 +0200
...
```
Pod with containers:
```
$ kubectl top pod heapster-v1.1.0-1111111111-miail --namespace=kube-system --containers
NAMESPACE NAME CPU MEMORY STORAGE TIMESTAMP
kube-system heapster-v1.1.0-1111111111-miail 1m 42 Mi 0 Mi Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:52:00 +0200
heapster 1m 26 Mi 0 Mi
eventer 0m 3 Mi 0 Mi
heapster-nanny 0m 6 Mi 0 Mi
eventer-nanny 0m 6 Mi 0 Mi
```
ref #11382
[]()
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/28844)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
component feature config proposal
This adds a proposal for a simple mechanism to pass runtime config to kube system components. Motivation is to have a consistent way to toggle new features that are not tied to an API group. Feedback appreciated
@mikedanese @lavalamp @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle @kubernetes/sig-node
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/30003)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add service and deployment create sub-commands to kubectl
```release-note
Added new commands kubectl create service & kubectl create deployment
```
Partial #25382
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow expressing inodes in percentages for eviction
Per discussion here:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/28055#issuecomment-230078770
The amount of inodes per disk can vary, and our operators would prefer to express eviction in terms of percentage available. So independent of a disk having 3.2M or 12M of total inodes, its more convenient to just express eviction as saying if available inodes falls below 10 or 5 percent of total capacity then trigger an action.
/cc @vishh @ronnielai @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra @twiest @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
docs: Detail possible transitions in CRI
Right now the document doesn't make it clear that transitions are unidirectional and a exited container won't be restarted, but replaced by a fresh copy.
cc @yujuhong @feiskyer @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix Incorrect response model for pods/{name}/log
The swagger spec for pods/{name}/log does not include
"text/plain" as a possible content-type for the the response.
So we implement ProducesMIMETypes to make sure "text/plain"
gets added to the default list ot content-types.
the v1.json was generated by running:
hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh;./hack/update-swagger-spec.sh;
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update the Pod Resource Management Proposal with Implementation status
This is tied to the upstream issue #27204 for adding pod level cgroups into Kubernetes.
@vishh @derekwaynecarr @Random-Liu PTAL.
The swagger spec for pods/{name}/log does not include
"text/plain" as a possible content-type for the the response.
So we implement ProducesMIMETypes to make sure "text/plain"
gets added to the default list ot content-types.
the v1.json was generated by running:
hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh;./hack/update-swagger-spec.sh;
Fixes#14071
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace with explicit kubernetes fork path
At other place in development.md, explicit kubernetes fork path has been existed:
mkdir -p $GOPATH/src/k8s.io
cd $GOPATH/src/k8s.io
# Replace "$YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME" below with your github username
git clone https://github.com/$YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME/kubernetes.git
the following is easy to be confused and can be replaced with same description:
git clone https://path/to/your/fork .
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Modify some detail information in contributing workflow
"Compare and pull request" is "Compare & pull request" actually.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move non-Minikube local cluster guides from docs repo to kubernetes d…
Move the local cluster docs out of the docs repo. Keeping them around since they may be used by some folks for development.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update the AppArmor design proposal
3 modifications to the original AppArmor design proposal:
1. Remove the pod-level AppArmor profile specification, since it was unnecessary complexity. I think the typical multi-container case is a main app, some side-cars (e.g. log helpers), and maybe some init containers. All of those containers are likely to have very different permissions needs, so I do not see benefit to the pod-level profile. If there is sufficient demand (i.e. user feedback) for this feature we can add it back.
2. Added a proposal for the beta (and GA) API. Beginning the discussion of this API now will smooth the transition from alpha, and guide the implementation of the internal API.
3. [EDIT] The profile deployment pod will poll the source directories for changes. This change is motivated by the fact that DaemonSets must run with RestartAlways.
/cc @bgrant0607 @erictune @pmorie @pweil-
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Validate list objects when building scheme
The first commit is #29468. This PR is a followup.
Modified the description of **List** in api-convention.md to:
`The name of a list kind must end with "List". Lists have a limited set of common metadata. All lists use the required "items" field to contain the array of objects they return. Any kind that has the "items" field must be a list kind.`
Also added code to enforce the above rules during scheme registration.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery @bgrant0607 @erictune @lavalamp @smarterclayton
Automatic merge from submit-queue
change the relative links to definition in operations.html
...to satisfy the new directory layout in the kubernetes.io.
This will make the manual changes in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io/pull/369 persist.
I still need to bump up the gcr.io/google_containers/gen-swagger-docs image version. I'll do that after I get LGTM here.
cc @bgrant0607 @xiangpengzhao
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node E2E: Make node e2e parallel
For https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/29081.
Fix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26215.
Based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/28807, https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29020, will rebase after they are merged.
**Only the last commit is new.**
We are going to move more tests into the node e2e test. However, currently node e2e test only run sequentially, the test duration will increase quickly when we add more test.
This PR makes the node e2e test run in parallel so as to shorten test duration, so that we can add more test to improve the test coverage.
* If you run the test locally with `make test-e2e-node`, it will use `-p` ginkgo flag, which uses `(cores-1)` parallel test nodes by default.
* If you run the test remotely or in the Jenkin, the parallelism will be controlled by the environment variable `PARALLELISM`. The default value is `8`, which is reasonable for our test node (n1-standard-1).
Before this PR, it took **833.592s** to run all test on my desktop.
With this PR, it only takes **234.058s** to run.
The pull request node e2e run with this PR takes **232.327s**.
The pull request node e2e run for other PRs takes **673.810s**.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add API for StorageClasses
This is the API objects only required for dynamic provisioning picked apart from the controller logic.
Entire feature is here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29006
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Initial support for pod eviction based on disk
This PR adds the following:
1. node reports disk pressure condition based on configured thresholds
1. scheduler does not place pods on nodes reporting disk pressure
1. kubelet will not admit any pod when it reports disk pressure
1. kubelet ranks pods for eviction when low on disk
1. kubelet evicts greediest pod
Follow-on PRs will need to handle:
1. integrate with new image gc PR (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/27199)
1. container gc policy should always run (will not be launched from eviction, tbd who does that)
1. this means kill pod is fine for all eviction code paths since container gc will remove dead container
1. min reclaim support will just poll summary provider (derek will do follow-on)
1. need to know if imagefs is same device as rootfs from summary (derek follow-on)
/cc @vishh @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove the omitempty tag from CertificateSigningRequestList.Items
As a general rule, `Items` should be a required field in all lists. In a followup PR, I'll update the api-convention.md and add a check in the schema registration path to enforce the rule. I need to fix this bug to unblock other work.
@kubernetes/api-review-team cc @bgrant0607-cc
