Commit Graph

1254 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kubernetes Submit Queue
f9cadb290b Merge pull request #22919 from liggitt/http-test-etcd
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Allow starting test etcd with http

There are cases where we'll want to start a test etcd without https (external tools monitoring tests, tests with lots of parallelism, etc). This makes it an option.

Helps with https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/23127

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/22919)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
2016-08-05 12:06:12 -07:00
deads2k
32920b5617 add subjectaccessreviews resource 2016-08-05 11:20:56 -04:00
Davanum Srinivas
e7a46a7c81 Fix Incorrect response model for pods/{name}/log
The swagger spec for pods/{name}/log does not include
"text/plain" as a possible content-type for the the response.
So we implement ProducesMIMETypes to make sure "text/plain"
gets added to the default list ot content-types.

the v1.json was generated by running:
hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh;./hack/update-swagger-spec.sh;

Fixes #14071
2016-08-05 08:54:14 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
996df923a1 Merge pull request #30020 from hongchaodeng/fix
Automatic merge from submit-queue

make reousrce prefix consistent with other registries

Storage class registry was added recently in #29694.
In other registries, resource prefix was changed to a more generic way using RESTOptions.ResourcePrefix.

This PR is an attempt to make both consistent.
2016-08-04 21:56:09 -07:00
Hongchao Deng
fc47f08183 make reousrce prefix consistent with other registries 2016-08-03 13:31:56 -07:00
deads2k
60dd4a5d26 interesting changes to add tokenreviews endpoint to implement webhook 2016-08-03 08:37:45 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
1edf254efb Merge pull request #25458 from errm/env-var-style-config-keys
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Allow Secret & ConfigMap keys to contain caps, dots, and underscores

[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?pixel)]()

Re: #23722

This makes loosens the regex used in in Secrets and ConfigMap,
in order to make environment variable style keys valid
2016-08-02 21:00:52 -07:00
Lucas Käldström
c88a07ce1a Run goimports 2016-08-02 15:12:39 +03:00
Ed Robinson
d4969ff032
Allows Secret & ConfigMap Keys to look like Environment Variables
This makes environment variable style keys (uppercase with underscores) valid
in Secrets and ConfigMap.
2016-08-01 20:56:40 +01:00
Harry Zhang
c495397cae Refactor uuid into its own pkg 2016-07-30 00:07:02 -04:00
childsb
f5bd7d471e API Changes for StorageClass 2016-07-28 19:01:01 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
2817674715 Merge pull request #29557 from deads2k/make-prefx-configurable
Automatic merge from submit-queue

make the resource prefix in etcd configurable for cohabitation

This looks big, its not as bad as it seems.

When you have different resources cohabiting, the resource name used for the etcd directory needs to be configurable.  HPA in two different groups worked fine before.  Now we're looking at something like RC<->RS.  They normally store into two different etcd directories.  This code allows them to be configured to store into the same location.

To maintain consistency across all resources, I allowed the `StorageFactory` to indicate which `ResourcePrefix` should be used inside `RESTOptions` which already contains storage information.

@lavalamp affects cohabitation.
@smarterclayton @mfojtik prereq for our rc<->rs and d<->dc story.
2016-07-28 03:01:28 -07:00
deads2k
aa3db4d995 make the resource prefix in etcd configurable for cohabitation 2016-07-27 07:51:40 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
b38271b6d5 Merge pull request #29518 from hongchaodeng/cleanup
Automatic merge from submit-queue

cleanup wrong naming: limitrange -> hpa

The code is in `horizontalpodautoscaler/strategy.go`, but the parameter is "limitrange". This is legacy copy-paste issue...
2016-07-25 11:43:36 -07:00
Hongchao Deng
f431d4c209 rename: limitrange -> hpa 2016-07-23 22:10:58 -07:00
Klaus Ma
2ee0f69ebd Corrected comments of node.NewStorage 2016-07-23 19:44:55 +08:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
4d0d115690 Revert "add tokenreviews endpoint to implement webhook" 2016-07-21 09:40:35 +02:00
deads2k
2c4a9f2e8d interesting changes to add tokenreviews endpoint to implement webhook 2016-07-20 15:11:56 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
1026eecc9d Merge pull request #26012 from sitepod/third-party-resource-list-json-fix
Automatic merge from submit-queue

include metadata in third party resource list serialization

Third party resource listing does not include important metadata such as resourceVersion and apiVersion. This commit includes the missing metadata and also replaces the string templating with an anonymous struct.
2016-07-19 04:00:34 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
be8abdabf8 Merge pull request #27157 from soltysh/scheduledjob_test_2
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Scheduledjob test cont.

This continuation of #25737.

@erictune @caesarxuchao ptal

[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?pixel)]()
2016-07-19 02:52:19 -07:00
Maciej Szulik
647124bf5e ScheduledJob client and storage tests 2016-07-18 21:01:21 +02:00
Davanum Srinivas
2b0ed014b7 Use Go canonical import paths
Add canonical imports only in existing doc.go files.
https://golang.org/doc/go1.4#canonicalimports

Fixes #29014
2016-07-16 13:48:21 -04:00
Clayton Coleman
c077bac341
Implement a RESTMappings method
With the introduction of batch/v1 and batch/v2alpha1, any
MultiRESTMapper that has per groupversion mappers (as a naive discovery
client would create) would end up being unable to call RESTMapping() on
batch.Jobs. As we finish up discovery we will need to be able to choose
prioritized RESTMappings based on the service discovery doc.

This change implements RESTMappings(groupversion) which returns all
possible RESTMappings for that kind.  That allows a higher level call to
prioritize the returned mappings by server or client preferred version.
2016-07-13 21:18:53 -04:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
1d9bc58328 Extend Filter interface with Trigger() and use it for pods and nodes 2016-07-13 08:45:18 +02:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
7f7ef0879f Change filter to interface in storage.Interface 2016-07-13 08:44:22 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot
6a4de0927c Merge pull request #28524 from hongchaodeng/listopt
Automatic merge from submit-queue

ListOptions: add test for ResourceVersion > 0 in List

ref: #28472 

Done:
- Add a test for ResourceVersion > 0 in registry (cache) store List()
- Fix the docs.
2016-07-12 03:41:39 -07:00
markturansky
3ddb8470b9 make PVCs immutable (except volumeName) post-creation 2016-07-11 11:50:16 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt
d4d6a0ee4c
Allow starting test etcd with http 2016-07-10 22:28:01 -04:00
Hongchao Deng
2d30a967ea ListOptions: add test for ResourceVersion > 0 in List 2016-07-06 14:44:33 -07:00
Hongchao Deng
8582ebb4be allocator ETCD: remove unused Refresh() 2016-07-05 12:46:53 -07:00
Wojciech Tyczynski
3f288e365d Simplify registries initialization 2016-07-04 14:20:29 +02:00
gmarek
638f4e1192 Setting deletion timestamp bumps object's generation 2016-07-01 16:45:43 +02:00
David McMahon
ef0c9f0c5b Remove "All rights reserved" from all the headers. 2016-06-29 17:47:36 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
32eccd413f Merge pull request #25562 from gtank/certificates-api-v9
Automatic merge from submit-queue

TLS bootstrap API group (alpha)

This PR only covers the new types and related client/storage code- the vast majority of the line count is codegen. The implementation differs slightly from the current proposal document based on discussions in design thread (#20439). The controller logic and kubelet support mentioned in the proposal are forthcoming in separate requests.

I submit that #18762 ("Creating a new API group is really hard") is, if anything, understating it. I've tried to structure the commits to illustrate the process.

@mikedanese @erictune @smarterclayton @deads2k

```release-note-experimental
An alpha implementation of the the TLS bootstrap API described in docs/proposals/kubelet-tls-bootstrap.md.
```

[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?pixel)]()
2016-06-28 13:25:22 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
d689a1f58b Merge pull request #27122 from lukaszo/uxlogs
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Include init containers in error messages
2016-06-27 23:14:36 -07:00
George Tankersley
2802f55c18 pkg/registry: add certificate storage 2016-06-27 14:29:16 -07:00
Matt Freeman
8eef335dec implement code review changes and add basic test 2016-06-27 08:27:04 +00:00
k8s-merge-robot
00b5b548d6 Merge pull request #26854 from xiang90/cacher
Automatic merge from submit-queue

cacher.go: remove NewCacher func

NewCacher is a wrapper of NewCacherFromConfig. NewCacher understands
how to create a key func from scopeStrategy. However, it is not the
responsibility of cacher. So we should remove this function, and
construct the config in its caller, which should understand scopeStrategy.
2016-06-25 11:10:06 -07:00
Matt Freeman
742447f8ce include metadata in third party res list output 2016-06-22 02:30:57 +00:00
Matt Freeman
3758df1681 handle watch event serialization for third party resources 2016-06-21 07:30:08 +00:00
k8s-merge-robot
ba771e7135 Merge pull request #27192 from smarterclayton/signature_change
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Remove EncodeToStream(..., []unversioned.GroupVersion)

Was not being used. Is a signature change and is necessary for post 1.3 work on Templates and other objects that nest objects.

Extracted from #26044
2016-06-19 16:13:07 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
6b9400d789 Merge pull request #26388 from caseydavenport/cd-networkpolicy-uts
Automatic merge from submit-queue

NetworkPolicy unit tests

- [x] Validation tests
- [x] storage tests
- [x] strategy tests
- [ ] test-cmd.sh

CC @thockin
2016-06-18 00:30:00 -07:00
Łukasz Oleś
038bb130b8 Include init containers in error messages
fixes: #27040
2016-06-13 12:20:20 +02:00
Clayton Coleman
36a5ffbe2f
Remove EncodeToStream(..., []unversioned.GroupVersion)
Was not being used.
2016-06-10 18:43:12 -04:00
Janet Kuo
c160f75157 Fix deployment strategy validation 2016-06-10 11:14:32 -07:00
Casey Davenport
9f2c3a677b Validation, etcd, strategy UTs for NetworkPolicy 2016-06-09 15:16:31 -07:00
Xiang Li
e2aab093aa cacher.go: remove NewCacher func
NewCacher is a wrapper of NewCacherFromConfig. NewCacher understands
how to create a key func from scopeStrategy. However, it is not the
responsibility of cacher. So we should remove this function, and
construct the config in its caller, which should understand scopeStrategy.
2016-06-04 22:46:58 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
421c16addd Merge pull request #25894 from brendandburns/thirdparty-watch
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Fix third party

Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/25421
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/25422

@AdoHe @sjenning @caesarxuchao @lavalamp 

@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery 

[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?pixel)]()
2016-06-04 15:42:41 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
525140a278 Merge pull request #26693 from AdoHe/init_containers
Automatic merge from submit-queue

exec support init containers

Partially fixes #25818 
@smarterclayton ptal.
2016-06-03 10:13:49 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
dbaf18026f Merge pull request #26529 from gitfred/deep-copy-svc
Automatic merge from submit-queue

DeepCopy Service instead of shallow copy #2049 

fixes #2049
2016-06-03 00:18:19 -07:00
AdoHe
1cfcb24f37 exec support init container 2016-06-03 02:05:15 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
0e9d809171 Merge pull request #26462 from mikedanese/fix-build-2
Automatic merge from submit-queue

fix go install ./pkg/...


appearantly this package is not imported
2016-06-02 20:51:41 -07:00
Brendan Burns
328a8392b1 Fix third party 2016-06-02 10:24:14 -07:00
Maciej Szulik
d8b9495ea0 Change suspend to be pointer for ScheduledJob and modify validation to forbid setting job selectors 2016-05-30 15:43:23 +02:00
Sylwester Brzeczkowski
af0f053cdf #2049 DeepCopy Service instead of shallow copy 2016-05-30 14:54:45 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot
e543bd6452 Merge pull request #26007 from smarterclayton/watch_opt
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Additional optimizations to the encode/decode paths

Builds on top of #25983 with a number of other optimizations.
2016-05-28 06:27:00 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
dd6d616190 Merge pull request #26381 from caesarxuchao/subresource-patch
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Expose GET and PATCH for status subresource

We can do this for other status subresource. I only updated node/status in this PR to unblock https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/9.

cc @Random-Liu @lavalamp
2016-05-27 18:53:33 -07:00
Mike Danese
d6852c1d0f fix go install ./pkg/...
appearantly this package is not imported
2016-05-27 15:54:50 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
35922bdcbd Merge pull request #26378 from pwittrock/fix-26138
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Retry concurrency exceptions in e2e/kubectl.go.  Fixes #26138





[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md?pixel)]()
2016-05-27 02:21:21 -07:00
Phillip Wittrock
feaa3aba82 Retry concurrency exceptions in e2e/kubectl.go. Fixes #26138 2016-05-26 14:44:51 -07:00
Chao Xu
5a9e5be4c6 expose GET and PATCH for status subresource 2016-05-26 14:33:54 -07:00
Alex Mohr
edda837142 Merge pull request #25599 from caesarxuchao/orphaning-finalizer
Add orphaning finalizer logic to GC
2016-05-26 13:19:19 -07:00
Eric Chiang
6f312f145d pkg/registry: add rbac storage 2016-05-25 14:19:55 -07:00
Chao Xu
1665546d2d add finalizer logics to the API server and the garbage collector; handling DeleteOptions.OrphanDependents in the API server 2016-05-24 13:07:28 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt
29252acd1a Change rest storage Update interface to retrieve updated object
Add OldObject to admission attributes

Update resthandler Patch/Update admission plumbing
2016-05-23 21:09:26 -04:00
Clayton Coleman
c6961d6fd6
Remove runtime.Typer, reduce to ObjectKinds(1) (3)
Remove the unnecessary variants, which avoids allocations in several
core paths.
2016-05-21 23:55:42 -04:00
Maciej Szulik
db08dedf5e ScheduledJob storage 2016-05-21 23:23:29 +02:00
Casey Davenport
47248f3698 v1beta1 NetworkPolicy API definition and client support 2016-05-19 19:02:54 -07:00
Tim Hockin
152c86ab06 Make name validators return string slices 2016-05-18 00:48:01 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
272674b2a6 Merge pull request #25007 from liggitt/third-party-resource-validation
Automatic merge from submit-queue

validate third party resources

addresses validation portion of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/22768

* ThirdPartyResource: validates name (3 segment DNS subdomain) and version names (single segment DNS label)
* ThirdPartyResourceData: validates objectmeta (name is validated as a DNS label)
* removes ability to use GenerateName with thirdpartyresources (kind and api group should not be randomized, in my opinion)

test improvements:
* updates resttest to clean up after create tests (so the same valid object can be used)
* updates resttest to take a name generator (in case "foo1" isn't a valid name for the object under test)

action required for alpha thirdpartyresource users:
* existing thirdpartyresource objects that do not match these validation rules will need to be removed/updated (after removing thirdpartyresourcedata objects stored under the disallowed versions, kind, or group names)
* existing thirdpartyresourcedata objects that do not match the name validation rule will not be able to be updated, but can be removed
2016-05-15 03:38:29 -07:00
Matt Liggett
f5e8d41431 Finish implementing policy API.
Registry implementation and addition to the master.
2016-05-13 17:27:58 -07:00
Clayton Coleman
51b624103f
Change ConvertToVersion to use GroupVersion
Long delayed refactor, avoids a few more allocations.
2016-05-12 10:10:35 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
132ebb091a Merge pull request #24459 from fgrzadkowski/unschedulable_pod
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Add pod condition PodScheduled to detect situation when scheduler tried to schedule a Pod, but failed

Set `PodSchedule` condition to `ConditionFalse` in `scheduleOne()` if scheduling failed and to `ConditionTrue` in `/bind` subresource.

Ref #24404

@mml (as it seems to be related to "why pending" effort)

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="http://reviewable.k8s.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](http://reviewable.k8s.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/24459)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
2016-05-12 05:54:06 -07:00
Filip Grzadkowski
a80b1798c4 Add pod condition PodScheduled to detect situation
when scheduler tried to schedule a Pod, but failed.

Ref #24404
2016-05-12 10:21:21 +02:00
Paul Weil
56193b7140 PSP types 2016-05-11 18:07:35 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt
6c323a4f72 Remove name generation from thirdpartyresource 2016-05-09 09:27:54 -04:00
Piotr Szczesniak
212b459817 Move internal types of hpa from pkg/apis/extensions to pkg/apis/autoscaling 2016-05-09 09:18:13 +02:00
k8s-merge-robot
3ee833ca3b Merge pull request #25006 from liggitt/third-party-root-scope
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Make ThirdPartyResource a root scoped object

ThirdPartyResource (the registration of a third party type) belongs at the cluster scope. It results in resource handlers installed in every namespace, and the same name in two namespaces collides (namespace is ignored when determining group/kind).

ThirdPartyResourceData (an actual instance of that type) is still namespace-scoped.

This PR moves ThirdPartyResource to be a root scope object. Someone previously using ThirdPartyResource definitions in alpha should be able to move them from namespace to root scope like this:

setup (run on 1.2):
```
kubectl create ns ns1

echo '{"kind":"ThirdPartyResource","apiVersion":"extensions/v1beta1","metadata":{"name":"foo.example.com"},"versions":[{"name":"v8"}]}' | kubectl create -f - --namespace=ns1

echo '{"kind":"Foo","apiVersion":"example.com/v8","metadata":{"name":"MyFoo"},"testkey":"testvalue"}' | kubectl create -f - --namespace=ns1
```

export:
```
kubectl get thirdpartyresource --all-namespaces -o yaml > tprs.yaml
```

remove namespaced kind registrations (this shouldn't remove the data of that type, which is another possible issue):
```
kubectl delete -f tprs.yaml
```

... upgrade ...

re-register the custom types at the root scope:
```
kubectl create -f tprs.yaml
```

Additionally, pre-1.3 clients that expect to read/write ThirdPartyResource at a namespace scope will not be compatible with 1.3+ servers, and 1.3+ clients that expect to read/write ThirdPartyResource at a root scope will not be compatible with pre-1.3 servers.
2016-05-06 20:50:35 -07:00
Clayton Coleman
e0ebcf4216
Split the storage and negotiation parts of Codecs
The codec factory should support two distinct interfaces - negotiating
for a serializer with a client, vs reading or writing data to a storage
form (etcd, disk, etc). Make the EncodeForVersion and DecodeToVersion
methods only take Encoder and Decoder, and slight refactoring elsewhere.

In the storage factory, use a content type to control what serializer to
pick, and use the universal deserializer. This ensures that storage can
read JSON (which might be from older objects) while only writing
protobuf. Add exceptions for those resources that may not be able to
write to protobuf (specifically third party resources, but potentially
others in the future).
2016-05-05 12:08:23 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
f5e1e9a227 Merge pull request #24912 from bprashanth/petset_controller
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Petset controller

Took longer than I expected. Main parts of this pr are:
1. Identity generation based on petset spec (volumes are mapped per discussion in #18016)
2. Ensure that we create/delete pets in sequence
3. Ensuring that we create, wait for healthy, create; or delete, wait for terminationGrace, delete
4. Controller that watches apiserver and drives actual -> desired

PVCs are not deleted, yet.
2016-05-05 08:58:23 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
3faf214506 Merge pull request #24924 from mqliang/pv-prepare-update
Automatic merge from submit-queue

fix PrepareForUpdate bug for PV and PVC
2016-05-05 01:46:21 -07:00
Prashanth Balasubramanian
6bc3052551 PetSet alpha controller 2016-05-04 18:39:17 -07:00
mqliang
0109c08b9b fix PrepareForUpdate bug for HPA 2016-05-05 09:39:03 +08:00
Jordan Liggitt
e41d504739 Move ThirdPartyResource to root scoped object 2016-04-30 01:06:07 -04:00
Clayton Coleman
fdb110c859
Fix the rest of the code 2016-04-29 17:12:10 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt
1e5815872e Validate deletion timestamp doesn't change on update 2016-04-28 11:50:48 -04:00
mqliang
3bcd5b1648 fix PrepareForUpdate bug for PV and PVC 2016-04-28 19:13:02 +08:00
k8s-merge-robot
d0b887e4e0 Merge pull request #24595 from zhouhaibing089/httpserverclose
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Uncomment the code that caused by #19254

Fix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24546.

@lavalamp
2016-04-28 01:41:16 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
28bc4b32c2 Merge pull request #24532 from rsc/master
Automatic merge from submit-queue

apiserver latency reductions

Combined effect of these two commits on the latency observed by the 1000-node kubemark benchmark:

```
name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    121 ± 9%   -4.58%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    266 ±12%  -18.48%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    400 ±14%  -11.79%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.085 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.6 ±59%  -17.33%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    177 ±49%  -17.68%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.7 ± 1%   -0.30%  (p=0.011 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   54.2 ±23%  -29.76%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.734 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.06%  (p=0.010 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   39.5 ±55%  -31.60%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.8 ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.012 n=30+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.3 ± 2%   -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   41.3 ±35%  -28.61%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.944 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.0 ± 5%   -2.18%  (p=0.001 n=29+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   32.9 ±46%  -36.99%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.903 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.287 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   26.4 ±12%  -14.73%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.92 ±15%   -4.54%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 3%   -0.73%  (p=0.017 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.1 ± 4%  -10.09%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.2 ± 5%   -5.47%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   20.9 ± 9%  -10.93%  (p=0.000 n=28+27)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.054 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.141 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.397 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p50                      0.77 ±10%   0.76 ±10%     ~     (p=0.317 n=28+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.14 ±24%   -4.66%  (p=0.036 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    7.5 ±46%  -34.28%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p50     0.74 ±17%   0.73 ±17%     ~     (p=0.222 n=30+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.231 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.063 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p50                       0.78 ±12%   0.77 ±10%     ~     (p=0.178 n=30+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.120 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.45 ±38%  -37.55%  (p=0.000 n=27+25)
LIST_services_p50                  0.20 ±13%   0.20 ±16%     ~     (p=0.854 n=28+29)
LIST_services_p90                  0.28 ±15%   0.27 ±14%     ~     (p=0.219 n=29+28)
LIST_services_p99                  0.49 ±20%   0.47 ±24%     ~     (p=0.140 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p50                 0.19 ±14%   0.19 ±15%     ~     (p=0.709 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p90                 0.26 ±16%   0.26 ±13%     ~     (p=0.274 n=29+28)
LIST_endpoints_p99                 0.46 ±24%   0.44 ±21%     ~     (p=0.111 n=29+29)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p50  0.16 ±15%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.253 n=30+27)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p90  0.22 ±24%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.152 n=30+28)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p99  0.31 ±33%   0.31 ±38%     ~     (p=0.817 n=28+29)
LIST_daemonsets_p50                0.16 ±20%   0.15 ±11%     ~     (p=0.135 n=30+27)
LIST_daemonsets_p90                0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±25%     ~     (p=0.135 n=29+28)
LIST_daemonsets_p99                0.29 ±28%   0.29 ±32%     ~     (p=0.606 n=28+28)
LIST_jobs_p50                      0.16 ±16%   0.15 ±12%     ~     (p=0.375 n=29+28)
LIST_jobs_p90                      0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.090 n=29+26)
LIST_jobs_p99                      0.31 ±28%   0.28 ±35%  -10.29%  (p=0.005 n=29+27)
LIST_deployments_p50               0.15 ±16%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.565 n=29+28)
LIST_deployments_p90               0.22 ±22%   0.21 ±19%     ~     (p=0.107 n=30+28)
LIST_deployments_p99               0.31 ±27%   0.29 ±34%     ~     (p=0.068 n=29+28)
LIST_namespaces_p50                0.21 ±25%   0.21 ±26%     ~     (p=0.768 n=29+27)
LIST_namespaces_p90                0.28 ±29%   0.26 ±25%     ~     (p=0.101 n=30+28)
LIST_namespaces_p99                0.30 ±48%   0.29 ±42%     ~     (p=0.339 n=30+29)
LIST_replicasets_p50               0.15 ±18%   0.15 ±16%     ~     (p=0.612 n=30+28)
LIST_replicasets_p90               0.22 ±19%   0.21 ±18%   -5.13%  (p=0.011 n=28+27)
LIST_replicasets_p99               0.31 ±39%   0.28 ±29%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+28)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p50         0.16 ±23%   0.15 ±21%     ~     (p=0.124 n=30+29)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p90         0.21 ±23%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.092 n=30+25)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p99         0.21 ±24%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.053 n=30+25)
LIST_resourcequotas_p50            0.16 ±12%   0.16 ±13%     ~     (p=0.175 n=27+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p90            0.20 ±22%   0.20 ±24%     ~     (p=0.388 n=30+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p99            0.22 ±24%   0.22 ±23%     ~     (p=0.575 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p50    0.15 ±21%   0.15 ±29%     ~     (p=0.079 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p90    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p99    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   56.3 ± 9%  -17.19%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%     93 ± 8%  -21.88%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    202 ±14%  -12.13%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
```
2016-04-27 08:32:18 -07:00
Timothy St. Clair
24b4286960 In preparation for new storage backends renaming generic registry store 2016-04-26 08:32:13 -05:00
k8s-merge-robot
293b0d0815 Merge pull request #23493 from soltysh/move_job_internals
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Move internal types of job from pkg/apis/extensions to pkg/apis/batch

This addressed the job part of #23216, this is still WIP. Will notify once finished. I'd like to have it in before starting working on ScheduledJob. 

@lavalamp @erictune fyi
2016-04-25 20:58:49 -07:00
zhouhaibing089
bf1a3f99c0 Uncomment the code that cause by #19254 2016-04-25 23:21:31 +08:00
Maciej Szulik
a3b4447305 Move internal types of job from pkg/apis/extensions to pkg/apis/batch 2016-04-25 11:03:54 +02:00
Clayton Coleman
3111985564 Handle streaming serializers more consistently
Add tests to watch behavior in both protocols (http and websocket)
against all 3 media types. Adopt the
`application/vnd.kubernetes.protobuf;stream=watch` media type for the
content that comes back from a watch call so that it can be
distinguished from a Status result.
2016-04-22 11:07:24 -04:00
Russ Cox
58629a28e4 pkg/registry/pod: avoid allocation in common pod search
PodToSelectableFields creates a map of field attributes
for a particular pod filter query to use. If the result
of the query does not depend on the fields at all, avoid
creating the map.

This is the source of about half the allocated memory
(by byte volume) during the kubemark benchmark, and it
is in turn the main driver of CPU usage during the benchmark,
because of the many background pod watches going on,
as well as the occasional list pods.

These benchmarks for 1000-node kubemark show the difference
from my previous CL (caching timers) to this CL:

name                               old ms/op   new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                       124 ±13%    121 ± 9%     ~     (p=0.136 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                       278 ±15%    266 ±12%   -4.26%  (p=0.031 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                       405 ±19%    400 ±14%     ~     (p=0.864 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p50                       65.3 ±13%   56.3 ± 9%  -13.75%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                        115 ±12%     93 ± 8%  -18.75%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
LIST_pods_p99                        226 ±21%    202 ±14%  -10.52%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50     26.6 ±43%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.487 n=29+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90     68.7 ±63%   68.6 ±59%     ~     (p=0.931 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99      173 ±41%    177 ±49%     ~     (p=0.618 n=28+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50      5.83 ±36%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.818 n=28+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90      15.9 ± 6%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.23%  (p=0.019 n=28+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99      56.7 ±41%   39.5 ±55%  -30.29%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                     24.3 ±17%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.855 n=28+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                     30.6 ± 0%   30.7 ± 1%     ~     (p=0.140 n=28+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                     56.3 ±27%   54.2 ±23%     ~     (p=0.188 n=28+27)
PUT_nodes_p50                       14.9 ± 1%   14.8 ± 2%     ~     (p=0.781 n=28+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                       16.4 ± 2%   16.3 ± 2%     ~     (p=0.321 n=28+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                       44.6 ±42%   41.3 ±35%     ~     (p=0.361 n=29+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50     6.33 ±23%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.993 n=28+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.2 ± 6%   15.0 ± 5%     ~     (p=0.106 n=28+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99     53.4 ±52%   32.9 ±46%  -38.41%  (p=0.000 n=27+27)
POST_pods_p50                       9.33 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.069 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p90                       16.3 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%   -1.43%  (p=0.044 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                       28.4 ±23%   26.4 ±12%   -7.05%  (p=0.004 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50   2.50 ±13%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.649 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90   11.7 ±10%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.863 n=28+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99   19.0 ±22%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.818 n=28+29)
PUT_pods_p50                        10.3 ± 5%   10.2 ± 5%     ~     (p=0.235 n=28+27)
PUT_pods_p90                        16.0 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%     ~     (p=0.380 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                        21.6 ±14%   20.9 ± 9%   -3.15%  (p=0.010 n=28+27)
POST_bindings_p50                   8.98 ±17%   8.92 ±15%     ~     (p=0.666 n=29+28)
POST_bindings_p90                   16.5 ± 2%   16.5 ± 3%     ~     (p=0.840 n=26+29)
POST_bindings_p99                   21.4 ± 5%   21.1 ± 4%   -1.21%  (p=0.049 n=27+28)
GET_nodes_p90                       1.18 ±19%   1.14 ±24%     ~     (p=0.137 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p99                       8.29 ±40%   7.50 ±46%     ~     (p=0.106 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90      1.03 ±21%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.489 n=29+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     10.0 ±123%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.794 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p90                        1.08 ±21%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.083 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                        2.81 ±39%   2.45 ±38%  -12.78%  (p=0.021 n=28+25)

Overall the two CLs combined have this effect:

name                               old ms/op  new ms/op   delta
LIST_nodes_p50                      127 ±16%    121 ± 9%   -4.58%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p90                      326 ±12%    266 ±12%  -18.48%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
LIST_nodes_p99                      453 ±11%    400 ±14%  -11.79%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p50    29.4 ±49%   26.2 ±54%     ~     (p=0.085 n=30+29)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p90    83.0 ±78%   68.6 ±59%  -17.33%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
LIST_replicationcontrollers_p99     216 ±43%    177 ±49%  -17.68%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p50                    24.5 ±14%   24.3 ±13%     ~     (p=0.562 n=30+29)
DELETE_pods_p90                    30.7 ± 1%   30.7 ± 1%   -0.30%  (p=0.011 n=29+29)
DELETE_pods_p99                    77.2 ±34%   54.2 ±23%  -29.76%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p50     5.86 ±26%   5.94 ±32%     ~     (p=0.734 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p90     15.8 ± 7%   15.5 ± 6%   -2.06%  (p=0.010 n=29+29)
PUT_replicationcontrollers_p99     57.8 ±35%   39.5 ±55%  -31.60%  (p=0.000 n=29+29)
PUT_nodes_p50                      14.9 ± 2%   14.8 ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.012 n=30+27)
PUT_nodes_p90                      16.5 ± 1%   16.3 ± 2%   -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_nodes_p99                      57.9 ±47%   41.3 ±35%  -28.61%  (p=0.000 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p50    6.35 ±29%   6.34 ±20%     ~     (p=0.944 n=30+28)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p90    15.4 ± 5%   15.0 ± 5%   -2.18%  (p=0.001 n=29+29)
POST_replicationcontrollers_p99    52.2 ±71%   32.9 ±46%  -36.99%  (p=0.000 n=29+27)
POST_pods_p50                      8.99 ±13%   8.95 ±16%     ~     (p=0.903 n=30+29)
POST_pods_p90                      16.2 ± 4%   16.1 ± 4%     ~     (p=0.287 n=29+29)
POST_pods_p99                      30.9 ±21%   26.4 ±12%  -14.73%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
POST_bindings_p50                  9.34 ±12%   8.92 ±15%   -4.54%  (p=0.013 n=30+28)
POST_bindings_p90                  16.6 ± 1%   16.5 ± 3%   -0.73%  (p=0.017 n=28+29)
POST_bindings_p99                  23.5 ± 9%   21.1 ± 4%  -10.09%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
PUT_pods_p50                       10.8 ±11%   10.2 ± 5%   -5.47%  (p=0.000 n=30+27)
PUT_pods_p90                       16.1 ± 1%   16.0 ± 1%   -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
PUT_pods_p99                       23.4 ± 9%   20.9 ± 9%  -10.93%  (p=0.000 n=28+27)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p50  2.42 ±16%   2.50 ±13%     ~     (p=0.054 n=29+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p90  11.5 ±12%   11.8 ±13%     ~     (p=0.141 n=30+28)
DELETE_replicationcontrollers_p99  19.5 ±21%   19.1 ±21%     ~     (p=0.397 n=29+29)
GET_nodes_p50                      0.77 ±10%   0.76 ±10%     ~     (p=0.317 n=28+28)
GET_nodes_p90                      1.20 ±16%   1.14 ±24%   -4.66%  (p=0.036 n=28+29)
GET_nodes_p99                      11.4 ±48%    7.5 ±46%  -34.28%  (p=0.000 n=28+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p50     0.74 ±17%   0.73 ±17%     ~     (p=0.222 n=30+28)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p90     1.04 ±25%   1.01 ±27%     ~     (p=0.231 n=30+29)
GET_replicationcontrollers_p99     12.1 ±81%  10.0 ±145%     ~     (p=0.063 n=28+29)
GET_pods_p50                       0.78 ±12%   0.77 ±10%     ~     (p=0.178 n=30+28)
GET_pods_p90                       1.06 ±19%   1.02 ±19%     ~     (p=0.120 n=29+28)
GET_pods_p99                       3.92 ±43%   2.45 ±38%  -37.55%  (p=0.000 n=27+25)
LIST_services_p50                  0.20 ±13%   0.20 ±16%     ~     (p=0.854 n=28+29)
LIST_services_p90                  0.28 ±15%   0.27 ±14%     ~     (p=0.219 n=29+28)
LIST_services_p99                  0.49 ±20%   0.47 ±24%     ~     (p=0.140 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p50                 0.19 ±14%   0.19 ±15%     ~     (p=0.709 n=29+29)
LIST_endpoints_p90                 0.26 ±16%   0.26 ±13%     ~     (p=0.274 n=29+28)
LIST_endpoints_p99                 0.46 ±24%   0.44 ±21%     ~     (p=0.111 n=29+29)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p50  0.16 ±15%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.253 n=30+27)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p90  0.22 ±24%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.152 n=30+28)
LIST_horizontalpodautoscalers_p99  0.31 ±33%   0.31 ±38%     ~     (p=0.817 n=28+29)
LIST_daemonsets_p50                0.16 ±20%   0.15 ±11%     ~     (p=0.135 n=30+27)
LIST_daemonsets_p90                0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±25%     ~     (p=0.135 n=29+28)
LIST_daemonsets_p99                0.29 ±28%   0.29 ±32%     ~     (p=0.606 n=28+28)
LIST_jobs_p50                      0.16 ±16%   0.15 ±12%     ~     (p=0.375 n=29+28)
LIST_jobs_p90                      0.22 ±18%   0.21 ±16%     ~     (p=0.090 n=29+26)
LIST_jobs_p99                      0.31 ±28%   0.28 ±35%  -10.29%  (p=0.005 n=29+27)
LIST_deployments_p50               0.15 ±16%   0.15 ±13%     ~     (p=0.565 n=29+28)
LIST_deployments_p90               0.22 ±22%   0.21 ±19%     ~     (p=0.107 n=30+28)
LIST_deployments_p99               0.31 ±27%   0.29 ±34%     ~     (p=0.068 n=29+28)
LIST_namespaces_p50                0.21 ±25%   0.21 ±26%     ~     (p=0.768 n=29+27)
LIST_namespaces_p90                0.28 ±29%   0.26 ±25%     ~     (p=0.101 n=30+28)
LIST_namespaces_p99                0.30 ±48%   0.29 ±42%     ~     (p=0.339 n=30+29)
LIST_replicasets_p50               0.15 ±18%   0.15 ±16%     ~     (p=0.612 n=30+28)
LIST_replicasets_p90               0.22 ±19%   0.21 ±18%   -5.13%  (p=0.011 n=28+27)
LIST_replicasets_p99               0.31 ±39%   0.28 ±29%     ~     (p=0.066 n=29+28)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p50         0.16 ±23%   0.15 ±21%     ~     (p=0.124 n=30+29)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p90         0.21 ±23%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.092 n=30+25)
LIST_persistentvolumes_p99         0.21 ±24%   0.20 ±23%     ~     (p=0.053 n=30+25)
LIST_resourcequotas_p50            0.16 ±12%   0.16 ±13%     ~     (p=0.175 n=27+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p90            0.20 ±22%   0.20 ±24%     ~     (p=0.388 n=30+28)
LIST_resourcequotas_p99            0.22 ±24%   0.22 ±23%     ~     (p=0.575 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p50    0.15 ±21%   0.15 ±29%     ~     (p=0.079 n=30+28)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p90    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_persistentvolumeclaims_p99    0.19 ±26%   0.18 ±34%     ~     (p=0.446 n=29+29)
LIST_pods_p50                      68.0 ±16%   56.3 ± 9%  -17.19%  (p=0.000 n=29+28)
LIST_pods_p90                       119 ±19%     93 ± 8%  -21.88%  (p=0.000 n=28+28)
LIST_pods_p99                       230 ±18%    202 ±14%  -12.13%  (p=0.000 n=27+28)
2016-04-21 15:53:47 -04:00
Prashanth Balasubramanian
0ac10c6cc2 PetSet type, apps apigroup 2016-04-20 18:49:31 -07:00
Clayton Coleman
a5ff573263 ThirdPartyResourceCodec should implement streaming.Framer
Wrappers must proxy NewFrameReader|Writer for now (until we potentially
refactor the codec factory to separate them).
2016-04-18 21:24:26 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot
2bf52175f9 Merge pull request #23923 from hongchaodeng/exp
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Decouple etcd node.expiration logic from DeleitonTimestamp

ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/23902
2016-04-17 04:12:26 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot
a275a045d1 Merge pull request #23914 from sky-uk/make-etcd-cache-size-configurable
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Make etcd cache size configurable

Instead of the prior 50K limit, allow users to specify a more sensible size for their cluster.

I'm not sure what a sensible default is here. I'm still experimenting on my own clusters. 50 gives me a 270MB max footprint. 50K caused my apiserver to run out of memory as it exceeded >2GB. I believe that number is far too large for most people's use cases.

There are some other fundamental issues that I'm not addressing here:
- Old etcd items are cached and potentially never removed (it stores using modifiedIndex, and doesn't remove the old object when it gets updated)
- Cache isn't LRU, so there's no guarantee the cache remains hot. This makes its performance difficult to predict. More of an issue with a smaller cache size.
- 1.2 etcd entries seem to have a larger memory footprint (I never had an issue in 1.1, even though this cache existed there). I suspect that's due to image lists on the node status.

This is provided as a fix for #23323
2016-04-17 00:06:31 -07:00
Hongchao Deng
b9745999c9 Decouple etcd node.expiration logic from DeleitonTimestamp 2016-04-13 15:11:53 -07:00