Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41137, 41268)
Allow the CertificateController to use any Signer implementation.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This will allow developers to create `CertificateController`s with arbitrary `Signer`s, instead of forcing the use of `CFSSLSigner`. It matches the behavior of allowing an arbitrary `AutoApprover` to be passed in the constructor.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
CC @mikedanese
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41248, 41214)
Switch hpa controller to shared informer
**What this PR does / why we need it**: switch the hpa controller to use a shared informer
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: Only the last commit is relevant. The others are from #40759, #41114, #41148
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
cc @smarterclayton @deads2k @sttts @liggitt @DirectXMan12 @timothysc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews @jszczepkowski @mwielgus @piosz
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39418, 41175, 40355, 41114, 32325)
TaintController
```release-note
This PR adds a manager to NodeController that is responsible for removing Pods from Nodes tainted with NoExecute Taints. This feature is beta (as the rest of taints) and enabled by default. It's gated by controller-manager enable-taint-manager flag.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41112, 41201, 41058, 40650, 40926)
Promote TokenReview to v1
Peer to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40709
We have multiple features that depend on this API:
- [webhook authentication](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authentication/#webhook-token-authentication)
- [kubelet delegated authentication](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-authentication)
- add-on API server delegated authentication
The API has been in use since 1.3 in beta status (v1beta1) with negligible changes:
- Added a status field for reporting errors evaluating the token
This PR promotes the existing v1beta1 API to v1 with no changes
Because the API does not persist data (it is a query/response-style API), there are no data migration concerns.
This positions us to promote the features that depend on this API to stable in 1.7
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
```release-note
The authentication.k8s.io API group was promoted to v1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40796, 40878, 36033, 40838, 41210)
StatefulSet hardening
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR contains the following changes to StatefulSet. Only one change effects the semantics of how the controller operates (This is described in #38418), and this change only brings the controller into conformance with its documented behavior.
1. pcb and pcb controller are removed and their functionality is encapsulated in StatefulPodControlInterface. This class modules the design contoller.PodControlInterface and provides an abstraction to clientset.Interface which is useful for testing purposes.
2. IdentityMappers has been removed to clarify what properties of a Pod are mutated by the controller. All mutations are performed in the UpdateStatefulPod method of the StatefulPodControlInterface.
3. The statefulSetIterator and petQueue classes are removed. These classes sorted Pods by CreationTimestamp. This is brittle and not resilient to clock skew. The current control loop, which implements the same logic, is in stateful_set_control.go. The Pods are now sorted and considered by their ordinal indices, as is outlined in the documentation.
4. StatefulSetController now checks to see if the Pods matching a StatefulSet's Selector also match the Name of the StatefulSet. This will make the controller resilient to overlapping, and will be enhanced by the addition of ControllerRefs.
5. The total lines of production code have been reduced, and the total number of unit tests has been increased. All new code has 100% unit coverage giving the module 83% coverage. Tests for StatefulSetController have been added, but it is not practical to achieve greater coverage in unit testing for this code (the e2e tests for StatefulSet cover these areas).
6. Issue #38418 is fixed in that StaefulSet will ensure that all Pods that are predecessors of another Pod are Running and Ready prior to launching a new Pod. This removes the potential for deadlock when a Pod needs to be rescheduled while its predecessor is hung in Pending or Initializing.
7. All reference to pet have been removed from the code and comments.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes #38418,#36859
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Fixes issue #38418 which, under circumstance, could cause StatefulSet to deadlock.
Mediates issue #36859. StatefulSet only acts on Pods whose identity matches the StatefulSet, providing a partial mediation for overlapping controllers.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40796, 40878, 36033, 40838, 41210)
Implement TTL controller and use the ttl annotation attached to node in secret manager
For every secret attached to a pod as volume, Kubelet is trying to refresh it every sync period. Currently Kubelet has a ttl-cache of secrets of its pods and the ttl is set to 1 minute. That means that in large clusters we are targetting (5k nodes, 30pods/node), given that each pod has a secret associated with ServiceAccount from its namespaces, and with large enough number of namespaces (where on each node (almost) every pod is from a different namespace), that resource in ~30 GETs to refresh all secrets every minute from one node, which gives ~2500QPS for GET secrets to apiserver.
Apiserver cannot keep up with it very easily.
Desired solution would be to watch for secret changes, but because of security we don't want a node watching for all secrets, and it is not possible for now to watch only for secrets attached to pods from my node.
So as a temporary solution, we are introducing an annotation that would be a suggestion for kubelet for the TTL of secrets in the cache and a very simple controller that would be setting this annotation based on the cluster size (the large cluster is, the bigger ttl is).
That workaround mean that only very local changes are needed in Kubelet, we are creating a well separated very simple controller, and once watching "my secrets" will be possible it will be easy to remove it and switch to that. And it will allow us to reach scalability goals.
@dchen1107 @thockin @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40917, 41181, 41123, 36592, 41183)
Set all node conditions to Unknown when node is unreachable
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Sets all node conditions to Unknown when node does not report status/unreachable
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36273
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41037, 40118, 40959, 41084, 41092)
Switch CSR controller to use shared informer
Switch the CSR controller to use a shared informer. Originally part of #40097 but I'm splitting that up into multiple PRs.
I have added a test to try to ensure we don't mutate the cache. It could use some fleshing out for additional coverage but it gets the initial job done, I think.
cc @mikedanese @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
1. pcb and pcb controller are removed and their functionality is
encapsulated in StatefulPodControlInterface.
2. IdentityMappers has been removed to clarify what properties of a Pod are
mutated by the controller. All mutations are performed in the
UpdateStatefulPod method of the StatefulPodControlInterface.
3. The statefulSetIterator and petQueue classes are removed. These classes
sorted Pods by CreationTimestamp. This is brittle and not resilient to
clock skew. The current control loop, which implements the same logic,
is in stateful_set_control.go. The Pods are now sorted and considered by
their ordinal indices, as is outlined in the documentation.
4. StatefulSetController now checks to see if the Pods matching a
StatefulSet's Selector also match the Name of the StatefulSet. This will
make the controller resilient to overlapping, and will be enhanced by
the addition of ControllerRefs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update owners file for job and cronjob controller
I've just noticed we have outdated OWNERS files for job and cronjob controllers.
@erictune ptal
@kubernetes/sig-contributor-experience-pr-reviews fyi
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40345, 38183, 40236, 40861, 40900)
refactor approver and signer interfaces to be consisten w.r.t. apiserver interaction
This makes it so that only the controller loop talks to the
API server directly. The signatures for Sign and Approve also
become more consistent, while allowing the Signer to report
conditions (which it wasn't able to do before).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40971, 41027, 40709, 40903, 39369)
Promote SubjectAccessReview to v1
We have multiple features that depend on this API:
SubjectAccessReview
- [webhook authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/authorization/#webhook-mode)
- [kubelet delegated authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/kubelet-authentication-authorization/#kubelet-authorization)
- add-on API server delegated authorization
The API has been in use since 1.3 in beta status (v1beta1) with negligible changes:
- Added a status field for reporting errors evaluating access
- A typo was discovered in the SubjectAccessReviewSpec Groups field name
This PR promotes the existing v1beta1 API to v1, with the only change being the typo fix to the groups field. (fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32709)
Because the API does not persist data (it is a query/response-style API), there are no data migration concerns.
This positions us to promote the features that depend on this API to stable in 1.7
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
```release-note
The authorization.k8s.io API group was promoted to v1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
federation: Refactoring namespaced resources deletion code from kube ns controller and sharing it with fed ns controller
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33612
Refactoring code in kube namespace controller to delete all resources in a namespace when the namespace is deleted. Refactored this code into a separate NamespacedResourcesDeleter class and calling it from federation namespace controller.
This is required for enabling cascading deletion of namespaced resources in federation apiserver.
Before this PR, we were directly deleting the namespaced resources and assuming that they go away immediately. With cascading deletion, we will have to wait for the corresponding controllers to first delete the resources from underlying clusters and then delete the resource from federation control plane. NamespacedResourcesDeleter has this waiting logic.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-misc @caesarxuchao @derekwaynecarr @mwielgus
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
