Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64815, 66823, 66473, 66466). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Clean up unused code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Clean up the unused duplicate code.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
switching rolling update to external clients
Switches rolling update to use external clients. This is a pretty strange looking command.
@kubernetes/sig-cli-maintainers
/assign @soltysh
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Removed unused functions.
Signed-off-by: Da K. Ma <klaus1982.cn@gmail.com>
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66877, 66066, 66851). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add namespace info for pod in log
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
add namespace info for pod in log
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix typo: scale dowm-> scale down
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65730, 66615, 66684, 66519, 66510). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Speed up HPA reaction to metric changes by removing scale up forbidden window
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Speed up HPA reaction to metric changes by removing scale up forbidden window.
Scale up forbidden window was protecting HPA against making decision to scale up based on metrics gathered during pod initialisation (which may be invalid, for example pod may be using a lot of CPU despite not doing any "actual" work).
To avoid that negative effect only use per pod metrics from pods that are:
- ready (so metrics about them should be valid), or
- unready but creation and last readiness change timestamps are apart more than 10s (pods that have formerly been ready and so metrics are in at least some cases (pod becoming unready because of overload) very useful).
This PR only deals with scale up window. I'll send another PR dealing with scale down window soon.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Speed up HPA reaction to metric changes by removing scale up forbidden window.
Scale up forbidden window was protecting HPA against making decision to scale up based on metrics gathered during pod initialisation (which may be invalid, for example pod may be using a lot of CPU despite not doing any "actual" work).
To avoid that negative effect only use per pod metrics from pods that are:
- ready (so metrics about them should be valid), or
- unready but creation and last readiness change timestamps are apart more than 10s (pods that have formerly been ready and so metrics are in at least some cases (pod becoming unready because of overload) very useful).
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
move feature gate checks inside IsCriticalPod
Currently `IsCriticalPod()` calls throughout the code are protected by `utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.ExperimentalCriticalPodAnnotation)`.
However, with Pod Priority, this gate could be disabled which skips the priority check inside IsCriticalPod().
This PR moves the feature gate checking inside `IsCriticalPod()` and handles both situations properly.
@aveshagarwal @ravisantoshgudimetla @derekwaynecarr
/sig node
/sig scheduling
/king bug
Instead discard metric values for pods that are unready and have never
been ready (they may report misleading values, the original reason for
introducing scale up forbidden window).
Use per pod metric when pod is:
- Ready, or
- Not ready but creation timestamp and last readiness change are more
than 10s apart.
In the latter case we asume the pod was ready but later became unready.
We want to use metrics for such pods because sometimes such pods are
unready because they were getting too much load.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65570, 65616). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Retry scheduling on StorageClass events
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56163
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have taken over #60006.
It's hard to test in e2e, because we cannot know reschedule of pod is triggered by which event (periodically service/node events will move pods to active queue too). ~~I'll add integration tests for this functionality after [this PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65296) get merged.~~ (already added)
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Default extensions/v1beta1 Deployment's ProgressDeadlineSeconds to MaxInt32
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Default values should be set in all API versions, because defaulting happens whenever a serialized version is read. When we switched to `apps/v1` as the storage version in `1.10` (#58854), `extensions/v1beta1` `DeploymentSpec.ProgressDeadlineSeconds` gets `apps/v1` default value (`600`) instead of being unset.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66135
**Special notes for your reviewer**: We need to cherrypick this fix to 1.10 and 1.11. Note that this fix will only help people who haven't upgraded to 1.10 or 1.11 when the storage version is changed.
@kubernetes/sig-apps-bugs
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
pkg/controller: remove old clientbuilder methods
everything has moved to client-go now so these are the same as the original Client* methods. The only functional change is the collapse of the "horizontal-pod-autoscaler" from one client to two. This should have no effect because the GoClient was used only for discovery.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64681, 65907). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Make runTest easier to understand
Fewer nested conditions, more checking for incorrect looking test cases.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Make HPA tests easier to understand.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fixes operation for "create on update"
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Set operation to `admission.Create` for create-on-update requests.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65553
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Checks CREATE admission for create-on-update requests instead of UPDATE admission
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65771, 65849). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add a new conversion path to replace GenericConversionFunc
reflect.Call is very expensive. We currently use a switch block as part of AddGenericConversionFunc to avoid the bulk of top level a->b conversion for our primary types which is hand-written. Instead of having these be handwritten, we should generate them.
The pattern for generating them looks like:
```
scheme.AddConversionFunc(&v1.Type{}, &internal.Type{}, func(a, b interface{}, scope conversion.Scope) error {
return Convert_v1_Type_to_internal_Type(a.(*v1.Type), b.(*internal.Type), scope)
})
```
which matches AddDefaultObjectFunc (which proved out the approach last year). The
conversion machinery should then do a simple map lookup based on the incoming types and invoke the function. Like defaulting, it's up to the caller to match the types to arguments, which we do by generating this code. This bypasses reflect.Call and in the future allows Golang mid-stack inlining to optimize this code.
As part of this change I strengthened registration of custom functions to be generated instead of hand registered, and also strengthened error checking of the generator when it sees a manual conversion to error out. Since custom functions are automatically used by the generator, we don't really have a case for not registering the functions.
Once this is fully tested out, we can remove the reflection based path and the old registration methods, and all conversion will work from point to point methods (whether generated or custom).
Much of the need for the reflection path has been removed by changes to generation (to omit fields) and changes to Go (to make assigning equivalent structs easy).
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66175, 66324, 65828, 65901, 66350). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Hpa improv refactor replica calc test
**What this PR does / why we need it**: prepareTestClient generates 4 fake clients, using replicaCalcTestCase object. This PR extracts a separate helper for generating each fake independently.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66175, 66324, 65828, 65901, 66350). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Chop computeReplicasForMetrics to smaller pieces
Split computeReplicasForMetrics function into smaller pieces.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
persistentvolume: fix spelling of storageClasseName
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixed spelling of error in 'pv_controller', was 'storageClasseName', is
now 'storageClassName'.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Just fixes the spelling in one of the errors returned in the persistent volume controller.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66304, 62943). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
set updated replicas
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Sets the `.status.updatedReplicas` field for stateful sets when they are being created. This behavior is consistent with how this field is handled in the deployments controller and also allows for `kubectl rollout status` to work when stateful sets are being created.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#52653
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
fix rollout status for statefulsets
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66094, 65676). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Safe encode template hash value to make it consistent with resource name
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66093
**Special notes for your reviewer**: It's safe to change the function that generates template hash label, because this value is only used when creating a resource and never updated or compared. Therefore, it won't break existing workloads after k8s upgrade/downgrade. Note that we've changed hash before when introducing hash collision avoidance mechanism.
@kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66136, 64999, 65425, 66120, 66074). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
optimize certificate cleaner
No need to parse certificates for every conditions
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65052, 65594). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix update node condition
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65051
/area cloudprovider
/sig cluster-lifecycle
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66076, 65792, 65649). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
kubernetes: fix printf format errors
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
```release-note
NONE
```
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
remove create-on-update logic for quota controller
review: add more error check
remove unused args
revert changes in patch.go
use hasUID to judge if it's a create-on-update
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64226, 65880). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Populate NodeAffinity on top of labels for cloud based PersistentVolumes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR populates the NodeAffinity field (on top of the existing labels) for PVs backed by cloud providers like EC2 EBS and GCE PD.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Related to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63232
Sample `describe pv` output for EBS with node affinity field populated:
```
kubectl describe pv pv0001
Name: pv0001
Labels: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region=us-west-2
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone=us-west-2a
Annotations: <none>
Finalizers: [kubernetes.io/pv-protection]
StorageClass:
Status: Available
Claim:
Reclaim Policy: Retain
Access Modes: RWO
Capacity: 5Gi
Node Affinity:
Required Terms:
Term 0: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone in [us-west-2a]
failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region in [us-west-2]
Message:
Source:
Type: AWSElasticBlockStore (a Persistent Disk resource in AWS)
VolumeID: vol-00cf03a068c62cbe6
FSType: ext4
Partition: 0
ReadOnly: false
Events: <none>
```
/sig storage
/assign @msau42
**Release note**:
```NONE```
