Most of these could have been refactored automatically but it wouldn't
have been uglier. The unsophisticated tooling left lots of unnecessary
struct -> pointer -> struct transitions.
This is gross but because NewDeleteOptions is used by various parts of
storage that still pass around pointers, the return type can't be
changed without significant refactoring within the apiserver. I think
this would be good to cleanup, but I want to minimize apiserver side
changes as much as possible in the client signature refactor.
The condition was not part of the message and so would not
match:
OCI runtime create failed: container_linux.go:349: starting container process caused "process_linux.go:449: container init caused \"rootfs_linux.go:58: mounting \\\"/var/lib/kubelet/pods/128aea1f-bde3-43d5-8b5f-dd86b9a5ef33/volumes/kubernetes.io~secret/default-token-v55hm\\\" to rootfs \\\"/var/lib/docker/overlay2/813487ba91d534ded546ae34f2a05e7d94c26bd015d356f9b2641522d8f0d6da/merged\\\" at \\\"/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount\\\" caused \\\"stat /var/lib/kubelet/pods/128aea1f-bde3-43d5-8b5f-dd86b9a5ef33/volumes/kubernetes.io~secret/default-token-v55hm: no such file or directory\\\"\"": unknown
Updated the check and regex.
Make sure the SR-IOV device plugin is ready, and that
there are enough SR-IOV devices allocatable before
spinning up test pods.
Signed-off-by: vpickard <vpickard@redhat.com>
1. move the integration test of TaintBasedEvictions to test/integration/node
2. move the e2e test of TaintBasedEvictions e2e test/e2e/node
3. modify the conformance file to adapt the TaintBasedEviction test
The current agnhost version is 2.12, 2.11 was not previously built as the
VERSION bumps merged one after the other, and the Image Promoter did not get to
build the 2.11 image.
In the current version, due to how make works, when building all the conformance
images (make all-push WHAT=all-conformance), ALL the images are being built first
before being pushed.
This PR will allow images to be built and pushed immediately afterwards, so the first
images that have been succesfully built are already pushed and promotable, even if
the the task failed on the last image, or it timed out.
A previous PR (#76838) introduced the ability to build and publish
Windows Test Images to kubernetes/test/images/image-util.sh.
Additionally, that PR also configured the Image Promoter to use a
few Windows Remote Docker build nodes to build the Windows Test Images,
however, there is a minor issue: the build container has a different $HOME
folder than expected (is: /builder/home, expected: /root - since it's the
root user), and the Remote Docker credentials are mounted in /root.
Because of that, image-build.sh cannot find the credentials it needs.
This will have to be properly fixed, but for now, we can just skip
the Windows image building part.
Quite a few images are only used a few times in a few tests. Thus,
the images are being centralized into the agnhost image, reducing
the number of images that have to be pulled and used.
This PR replaces the usage of the following images with agnhost:
- dnsutils
dnsmasq is a Linux specific binary. In order for the tests to also
pass on Windows, CoreDNS should be used instead.
- Search/replace Google Infra kube-cross locations for K8s Infra
- Update kube-cross make targets
- Don't attempt to pre-pull image (docker build --pull)
This prevents CI failures when the image under test doesn't exist
yet in the registry.
- 'make all' now builds and pushes the kube-cross image
- Allow 'TAG' to be specified via env var
- Use 'KUBE_CROSS_VERSION' to represent the kube-cross version
- Tag kube-cross images with both a kubernetes version
('git describe') and a kube-cross version
- Add a GCB (Google Cloud Build) config file (cloudbuild.yaml)
Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus <saugustus@vmware.com>
We don't want to set the name directly because then starting the pod
can fail when the node is temporarily out of resources
(https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/87855).
For CSI driver deployments, we have three options:
- modify the pod spec with custom code, similar
to how the NodeSelection utility code does it
- add variants of SetNodeSelection and SetNodeAffinity which
work with a pod spec instead of a pod
- change their parameter from pod to pod spec and then use
them also when patching a pod spec
The last approach is used here because it seems more general. There
might be other cases in the future where there's only a pod spec that
needs to be modified.
