Add aws cloud config:
[global]
disableSecurityGroupIngress = true
The aws provider creates an inbound rule per load balancer on the node
security group. However, this can quickly run into the AWS security
group rule limit of 50.
This disables the automatic ingress creation. It requires that the user
has setup a rule that allows inbound traffic on kubelet ports from the
local VPC subnet (so load balancers can access it). E.g. `10.82.0.0/16
30000-32000`.
Limits: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/VPC_Appendix_Limits.html#vpc-limits-security-groups
Authors: @jsravn, @balooo
When finding instance by node name in AWS, only retrieve running
instances. Otherwise terminated, old nodes can show up with the same
tag when rebuilding nodes in the cluster.
Another improvement made is to filter instances by the node names
provided, rather than selecting all instances and filtering in code.
Authors: @jsravn, @chbatey, @balooo
This applies a cross-request time delay when we observe
RequestLimitExceeded errors, unlike the default library behaviour which
only applies a *per-request* backoff.
Issue #12121
In the AWS API (generally) we tag things we create, and then we filter
to find them. However, creation & tagging are typically two separate
calls. So there is a chance that we will create an object, but fail to
tag it.
We fix this (done here in the case of security groups, but we can do
this more generally) by retrieving the resource without a tag filter.
If the retrieved resource has the correct tags, great. If it has the
tags for another cluster, that's a problem, and we raise an error. If
it has no tags at all, we add the tags.
This only works where the resource is uniquely named (or we can
otherwise retrieve it uniquely). For security groups, the SG name comes
from the service UUID, so that's unique.
Fixes#11324
This commit allows the AWS cloud provider plugin to work on EC2 instances
that do not have a public IP. The EC2 metadata service returns a 404 for the
'public-ipv4' endpoint for private instances, and the plugin was bubbling this
up as a fatal error.
We are (sadly) using a copy-and-paste of the GCE PD code for AWS EBS.
This code hasn't been updated in a while, and it seems that the GCE code
has some code to make volume mounting more robust that we should copy.
The ip permission method now checks for containment, not equality, so
order of parameters matter. This change fixes
`removeSecurityGroupIngress` to pass in the removal permission first to
compare against the existing permission.
Change isEqualIPPermission to consider the entire list of security group
ids on when checking if a security group id has already been added.
This is used for example when adding and removing ingress rules to the
cluster nodes from an elastic load balancer. Without this, once there
are multiple load balancers, the method as it stands incorrectly returns
false even if the security group id is in the list of group ids. This
causes a few problems: dangling security groups which fill up an
account's limit since they don't get removed, and inability to recreate
load balancers in certain situations (receiving an
InvalidPermission.Duplicate from AWS when adding the same security
group).
findInstancesByNodeNames was a simple loop around
findInstanceByNodeName, which made an EC2 API call for each call.
We've had trouble with this sort of behaviour hitting EC2 rate limits on
bigger clusters (e.g. #11979).
Instead, change this method to fetch _all_ the tagged EC2 instances, and
then loop through the local results. This is one API call (modulo
paging).
We are currently only using findInstancesByNodeNames for the load
balancer, where we attach every node, so we were fetching all but one of
the instances anyway.
Issue #11979
For AWS EBS, a volume can only be attached to a node in the same AZ.
The scheduler must therefore detect if a volume is being attached to a
pod, and ensure that the pod is scheduled on a node in the same AZ as
the volume.
So that the scheduler need not query the cloud provider every time, and
to support decoupled operation (e.g. bare metal) we tag the volume with
our placement labels. This is done automatically by means of an
admission controller on AWS when a PersistentVolume is created backed by
an EBS volume.
Support for tagging GCE PVs will follow.
Pods that specify a volume directly (i.e. without using a
PersistentVolumeClaim) will not currently be scheduled correctly (i.e.
they will be scheduled without zone-awareness).
General purpose SSD ('gp2') volume type is just slighly more expensive than
Magnetic ('standard' / default in AWS), while the performance gain is pretty
significant.
So far, the volumes were created only during testing, where the extra cost
won't make any difference. In future, we plan to introduce QoS classes, where
users could choose SSD/Magnetic depending on their use cases.
'gp2' is just the default volume type for (hopefuly) short period before these
QoS classes are implemented.
