Automatic merge from submit-queue
HPA: Consider unready pods separately
**Release note**:
``` release-note
The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler now takes the readiness of pods into account when calculating desired replicas.
```
Currently, the HPA considers unready pods the same as ready pods when
looking at their CPU and custom metric usage. However, pods frequently
use extra CPU during initialization, so we want to consider them
separately.
This commit causes the HPA to consider unready pods as having 0 CPU
usage when scaling up, and ignores them when scaling down. If, when
scaling up, factoring the unready pods as having 0 CPU would cause a
downscale instead, we simply choose not to scale. Otherwise, we simply
scale up at the reduced amount calculated by factoring the pods in at
zero CPU usage.
Similarly, if we are missing metrics for any pods, those pods will be
considered as having 0% CPU when scaling up, and 100% CPU when
scaling down. As with the unready pods calculation, this cannot change
the direction of the scale.
The effect is that unready pods cause the autoscaler to be a bit more
conservative -- large increases in CPU usage can still cause scales,
even with unready pods in the mix, but will not cause the scale factors
to be as large, in anticipation of the new pods later becoming ready and
handling load.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
improve and modify log
1, the content of a unified writing, compared to the following line of failure (314th lines)
2, “instance” should be “node”
Currently, the HPA considers unready pods the same as ready pods when
looking at their CPU and custom metric usage. However, pods frequently
use extra CPU during initialization, so we want to consider them
separately.
This commit causes the HPA to consider unready pods as having 0 CPU
usage when scaling up, and ignores them when scaling down. If, when
scaling up, factoring the unready pods as having 0 CPU would cause a
downscale instead, we simply choose not to scale. Otherwise, we simply
scale up at the reduced amount caculated by factoring the pods in at
zero CPU usage.
The effect is that unready pods cause the autoscaler to be a bit more
conservative -- large increases in CPU usage can still cause scales,
even with unready pods in the mix, but will not cause the scale factors
to be as large, in anticipation of the new pods later becoming ready and
handling load.
Similarly, if there are pods for which no metrics have been retrieved,
these pods are treated as having 100% of the requested metric when
scaling down, and 0% when scaling up. As above, this cannot change the
direction of the scale.
This commit also changes the HPA to ignore superfluous metrics -- as
long as metrics for all ready pods are present, the HPA we make scaling
decisions. Currently, this only works for CPU. For custom metrics, we
cannot identify which metrics go to which pods if we get superfluous
metrics, so we abort the scale.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rename experimental-runtime-integration-type to experimental-cri
Also rename the field in the component config to `EnableCRI`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Default kube-proxy to the old behavior for proxier sync.
Fix#36281.
This PR defaults `minSyncPeriod` to 0 and makes kube-proxy fall back to the old behavior to fix the immediate problem #36266.
@bprashanth
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enable HPA controller based on autoscaling/v1 api group
ref #29778
``` release-note
Enable HPA controller based on autoscaling/v1 api group.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
lister-gen updates
- Remove "zz_generated." prefix from generated lister file names
- Add support for expansion interfaces
- Switch to new generated JobLister
@deads2k @liggitt @sttts @mikedanese @caesarxuchao for the lister-gen changes
@soltysh @deads2k for the informer / job controller changes
Automatic merge from submit-queue
New command: "kubeadm token generate"
As part of #33930, this PR adds a new top-level command to kubeadm to just generate a token for use with the init/join commands. Otherwise, users are left to either figure out how to generate a token on their own, or let `kubeadm init` generate a token, capture and parse the output, and then use that token for `kubeadm join`.
At this point, I was hoping for feedback on the CLI experience, and then I can add tests. I spoke with @mikedanese and he didn't like the original propose of `kubeadm util generate-token`, so here are the runners up:
```
$ kubeadm generate-token # <--- current implementation
$ kubeadm generate token # in case kubeadm might generate other things in the future?
$ kubeadm init --generate-token # possibly as a subcommand of an existing one
```
Currently, the output is simply the token on one line without any padding/formatting:
```
$ kubeadm generate-token
1087fd.722b60cdd39b1a5f
```
CC: @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
``` release-note
New kubeadm command: generate-token
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make using service account credentials from controllers optional
Adds a flag to make the "SA per controller" behavior optional.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove non-generic options from genericapiserver.Config
Remove non-generic options from genericapiserver.Config. Changes the discovery CIDR/IP information to an interface and then demotes several fields.
I haven't pulled from them genericapiserver.Options, but that's a future option we have. Segregation as as a followup at the very least.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/kubectl
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Comment on the pull-request explaining the changes you want. I'll
take care of doing them (unless you want to modify the pull-request
yourself).
2. OWNERS files in subdirectory can be removed if they are redundant with
top-directory files.
3. Please use the ALIAS feature if you want to re-use a list of persons
in different files.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch DisruptionBudget api from bool to int allowed disruptions [only v1beta1]
Continuation of #34546. Apparently it there is some bug that prevents us from having 2 different incompatibile version of API in integration tests. So in this PR v1alpha1 is removed until testing infrastructure is fixed.
Base PR comment:
Currently there is a single bool in disruption budget api that denotes whether 1 pod can be deleted or not. Every time a pod is deleted the apiserver filps the bool to false and the disruptionbudget controller sets it to true if more deletions are allowed. This works but it is far from optimal when the user wants to delete multiple pods (for example, by decreasing replicaset size from 10000 to 8000).
This PR adds a new api version v1beta1 and changes bool to int which contains a number of pods that can be deleted at once.
cc: @davidopp @mml @wojtek-t @fgrzadkowski @caesarxuchao
--v=2 is low noise (record changes), can be default
--v=3 will shows per request logging
Note: due to the code path with which we integrate with
skydns, we don't see non-PILLAR_DOMAIN requests, so these
will never be logged.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
promote /healthz and /metrics to genericapiserver
Promotes `/healthz` to genericapiserver with methods to add healthz checks before running.
Promotes `/metrics` to genericapiserver gated by config flag.
@lavalamp adds the healthz checks linked to `postStartHooks` as promised.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Kubelet] Use the custom mounter script for Nfs and Glusterfs only
This patch reduces the scope for the containerized mounter to NFS and GlusterFS on GCE + GCI clusters
This patch also enabled the containerized mounter on GCI nodes
Shepherding multiple PRs through the submit queue is painful. Hence I combined them into this PR. Please review each commit individually.
cc @jingxu97 @saad-ali
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35652 has also been reverted as part of this PR
Automatic merge from submit-queue
pod and qos level cgroup support
```release-note
[Kubelet] Add alpha support for `--cgroups-per-qos` using the configured `--cgroup-driver`. Disabled by default.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move Statefulset (previously PetSet) to v1beta1
**What this PR does / why we need it**: #28718
**Which issue this PR fixes** _(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)_: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: depends on #35663 (PetSet rename)
cc @erictune @foxish @kubernetes/sig-apps
**Release note**:
``` release-note
v1beta1/StatefulSet replaces v1alpha1/PetSet.
```
We recently improved this to tolerate existence of things like
/etc/kubernetes/manifests/ as an empty dir, but forgot to do so for the
join pre-flight checks where it is also failing.
Instead ensure only the sub-directories and files we need are available.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Avoid double decoding all client responses
Fixes#35982
The linked issue uncovered that we were always double decoding the response in restclient for get, list, update, create, and patch. That's fairly expensive, most especially for list. This PR refines the behavior of the rest client to avoid double decoding, and does so while minimizing the changes to rest client consumers.
restclient must be able to deal with multiple types of servers. Alter the behavior of restclient.Result#Raw() to not process the body on error, but instead to return the generic error (which still matches the error checking cases in api/error like IsBadRequest). If the caller uses
.Error(), .Into(), or .Get(), try decoding the body as a Status.
For older servers, continue to default apiVersion "v1" when calling restclient.Result#Error(). This was only for 1.1 servers and the extensions group, which we have since fixed.
This removes a double decode of very large objects (like LIST) - we were trying to DecodeInto status, but that ends up decoding the entire result and then throwing it away. This makes the decode behavior specific to the type of action the user wants.
```release-note
The error handling behavior of `pkg/client/restclient.Result` has changed. Calls to `Result.Raw()` will no longer parse the body, although they will still return errors that react to `pkg/api/errors.Is*()` as in previous releases. Callers of `Get()` and `Into()` will continue to receive errors that are parsed from the body if the kind and apiVersion of the body match the `Status` object.
This more closely aligns rest client as a generic RESTful client, while preserving the special Kube API extended error handling for the `Get` and `Into` methods (which most Kube clients use).
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make ./pkg/client/listers compile
currently compilation is broken
```
$ go install ./pkg/client/listers/...
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/apps/v1alpha1
pkg/client/listers/apps/v1alpha1/zz_generated.statefulset.go:89: undefined: apps in apps.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/autoscaling/v1
pkg/client/listers/autoscaling/v1/zz_generated.horizontalpodautoscaler.go:89: undefined: autoscaling in autoscaling.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/batch/v2alpha1
pkg/client/listers/batch/v2alpha1/zz_generated.job.go:89: undefined: batch in batch.Resource
pkg/client/listers/batch/v2alpha1/zz_generated.scheduledjob.go:89: undefined: batch in batch.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/authentication/v1beta1
pkg/client/listers/authentication/v1beta1/zz_generated.tokenreview.go:63: undefined: authentication in authentication.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/batch/v1
pkg/client/listers/batch/v1/zz_generated.job.go:89: undefined: batch in batch.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/authorization/v1beta1
pkg/client/listers/authorization/v1beta1/zz_generated.localsubjectaccessreview.go:89: undefined: authorization in authorization.Resource
pkg/client/listers/authorization/v1beta1/zz_generated.selfsubjectaccessreview.go:63: undefined: authorization in authorization.Resource
pkg/client/listers/authorization/v1beta1/zz_generated.subjectaccessreview.go:63: undefined: authorization in authorization.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/certificates/v1alpha1
pkg/client/listers/certificates/v1alpha1/zz_generated.certificatesigningrequest.go:63: undefined: certificates in certificates.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/policy/v1alpha1
pkg/client/listers/policy/v1alpha1/zz_generated.poddisruptionbudget.go:89: undefined: policy in policy.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/core/v1
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.componentstatus.go:62: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.configmap.go:89: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.endpoints.go:89: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.event.go:89: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.limitrange.go:89: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.namespace.go:62: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.node.go:62: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.persistentvolume.go:62: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.persistentvolumeclaim.go:89: undefined: api in api.Resource
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.pod.go:89: undefined: api
pkg/client/listers/core/v1/zz_generated.pod.go:89: too many errors
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/imagepolicy/v1alpha1
pkg/client/listers/imagepolicy/v1alpha1/zz_generated.imagereview.go:63: undefined: imagepolicy in imagepolicy.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/rbac/v1alpha1
pkg/client/listers/rbac/v1alpha1/zz_generated.clusterrole.go:63: undefined: rbac in rbac.Resource
pkg/client/listers/rbac/v1alpha1/zz_generated.clusterrolebinding.go:63: undefined: rbac in rbac.Resource
pkg/client/listers/rbac/v1alpha1/zz_generated.role.go:89: undefined: rbac in rbac.Resource
pkg/client/listers/rbac/v1alpha1/zz_generated.rolebinding.go:89: undefined: rbac in rbac.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/storage/v1beta1
pkg/client/listers/storage/v1beta1/zz_generated.storageclass.go:63: undefined: storage in storage.Resource
# k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.daemonset.go:89: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.deployment.go:89: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.ingress.go:89: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.job.go:89: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.podsecuritypolicy.go:63: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.replicaset.go:89: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.scale.go:89: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1/zz_generated.thirdpartyresource.go:63: undefined: extensions in extensions.Resource
```
cc @ncdc @caesarxuchao
