Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove proxy-mode annotation from kube-proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This removes the net.experimental.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode and net.beta.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode annotations from kube-proxy.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#40582
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove outdated net.experimental.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode and net.beta.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode annotations from kube-proxy.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39469, 40557)
Forgiveness api changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Splited from #34825 , contains api changes that are needed to implement forgiveness:
1. update toleration api types to support forgiveness, added a new field forgivenessSeconds to indicate the duration of time it tolerates a taint.
2. update taint api types, added a new field to indicate the time the taint is added.
**Which issue this PR fixes** :
Related issue: #1574
Related PR: #34825
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
forgiveness alpha version api definition
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37228, 40146, 40075, 38789, 40189)
move apimachinery/announced to apimachinery
This also rewires the announce package to allow installation into multiple groups via multiple calls to `install.Install`. At some point, we'll want to unwire the hardcoded, "install to this scheme" call.
@lavalamp something we've wanted for a while and need for genericapiserver
@seh you've asked related questions
@sttts ptal. First commit is interesting, second commit is a straight move.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39807, 37505, 39844, 39525, 39109)
Admission control support for versioned configuration files
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Today, the `--admission-control-config-file=` argument takes an opaque file that is shared across all admission controllers to provide configuration. This file is not well-versioned and it's shared across multiple plug-ins. Some plugins take file based configuration (`ImagePolicyWebhook`) and others abuse flags to provide configuration because we lacked a good example (`InitialResources`). This PR defines a versioned configuration format that we can use moving forward to provide configuration input to admission controllers that is well-versioned, and does not require the addition of new flags.
The sample configuration file would look as follows:
```
apiVersion: componentconfig/v1alpha1
kind: AdmissionConfiguration
plugins:
- name: "ImagePolicyWebhook"
path: "image-policy-webhook.json"
```
The general behavior is each plugin that requires additional configuration is enumerated by name. An alternate file location is provided for its specific configuration, or the configuration can be embedded as a raw extension via the configuration section.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
A follow-on PR will be needed to make `ImagePolicyWebhook` to use versioned configuration. This PR maintains backwards compatibility by ignoring configuration it cannot understand and therefore treating the file as opaque. I plan to make use of this PR to complete https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36765 which attempts to allow more configuration parameters to the `ResourceQuota` admission plugin.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39466, 39490, 39527)
bump gengo to latest
bumping gengo to limit surprises while working on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39475
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39351, 39322)
Remove the deprecated --reconcile-cidr flag from kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removes the `--reconcile-cidr` flag that has been deprecated since v1.5
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The `--reconcile-cidr` kubelet flag was removed since it had been deprecated since v1.5
```
@thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36263, 36755, 37357, 37222, 37524)
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```release-note
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
