Automatic merge from submit-queue
deflake TestPatch by waiting for cache
Fixes#39471
Rather than retry on conflicts for an unknown number of times, we have the resource version after the previous patch and we can use that to wait for a GET response that is at least as current as that resourceVersion.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @liggitt @wojtek-t
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41890, 42593, 42633, 42626, 42609)
Pods pending due to insufficient OIR should get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available (e2e disabled).
#41870 was reverted because it introduced an e2e test flake. This is the same code with the e2e for OIR disabled again.
We can attempt to enable the e2e test cases one-by-one in follow-up PRs, but it would be preferable to get the main fix merged in time for 1.6 since OIR is broken on master (see #41861).
cc @timothysc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41890, 42593, 42633, 42626, 42609)
Remove everything that is not new from batch/v2alpha1
Fixes#37166.
@lavalamp you've asked for it
@erictune this is a prereq for moving CronJobs to beta. I initially planned to put all in one PR, but after I did that I figured out it'll be easier to review separately. ptal
@kubernetes/api-approvers @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42506, 42585, 42596, 42584)
[Federation][e2e] Add wait for namespaces to appear in federated cluster
Some federation e2e tests are failing because the namespace (created for every test case) does not seem to appear in one (or more) of federated clusters.
This may be a timing issue, so introducing a wait until the namespace is created in federated clusters.
cc @madhusudancs, @nikhiljindal, @kubernetes/sig-federation-bugs
Automatic merge from submit-queue
cgroup names created by kubelet should be lowercased
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR modifies the kubelet to create cgroupfs names that are lowercased. This better aligns us with the naming convention for cgroups v2 and other cgroup managers in ecosystem (docker, systemd, etc.)
See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
"2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions"
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
none
**Release note**:
```release-note
kubelet created cgroups follow lowercase naming conventions
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
Fix resource cleanup in ingress_utils.go within e2e/framework
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The GLBC is failing to delete resources during the etcd rollback tests and the e2e cleanup is leaking them. After a short while, tests are failing to create new resources.
This PR addresses the e2e/framework's ability to delete GLBC-created resources and adds more logging.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Helps #38569 but does not completely close this flake
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Resources were not being deleted because resource names were being truncated and then their ability to be deleted was determined by the entire cluster id existing in the name. Truncated names also have an extra '0' append to the end of their name (unknown origin). This PR tries to match on a common prefix.
Minor changes were made to improve log readability.
**Testing this PR**:
This was tested by running a master upgrade test and by adding a second forwarding-rule mid-run. This forwarding rule referenced the same url-map used by the first forwarding-rule created by the GLBC. Therefore, the GLBC will be able to delete the forwarding-rule but not anymore L7 resources. This second forwarding rule's name was nearly identical to the first forwarding rule so that the cleanup code will find it.
As you can see from the test run below, the cleanup code deleted all the resources that the GLBC could not.
```log
...
Mar 5 18:35:53.112: INFO: Monitoring glbc's cleanup of gce resources:
k8s-fws-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrsde-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420 (forwarding rule)
k8s-tps-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420 (target-https-proxy)
k8s-um-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e24260 (url-map)
k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796 (backend-service)
k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796 (backend-service)
k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796 (http-health-check)
k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796 (http-health-check)
k8s-ig--5f38ac0e2426f796 (instance-group)
k8s-ssl-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420 (ssl-certificate)
STEP: Performing final delete of any remaining resources
Mar 5 18:35:54.055: INFO: Deleting forwarding-rules: k8s-fws-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrsde-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420
Mar 5 18:36:06.945: INFO: Deleting target-https-proxies: k8s-tps-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420
Mar 5 18:36:14.301: INFO: Deleting url-map: k8s-um-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e24260
Mar 5 18:36:18.309: INFO: Deleting backed-service: k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:22.112: INFO: Deleting backed-service: k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:26.192: INFO: Deleting http-health-check: k8s-be-32331--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:29.846: INFO: Deleting http-health-check: k8s-be-32613--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:33.722: INFO: Deleting instance-group: k8s-ig--5f38ac0e2426f796
Mar 5 18:36:37.762: INFO: Deleting ssl-certificate: k8s-ssl-e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip--5f38ac0e2420
STEP: No resources leaked.
Mar 5 18:36:46.441: INFO: Deleting addresses: e2e-tests-ingress-upgrade-0px85-static-ip
Mar 5 18:36:53.902: INFO: L7 controller failed to delete all cloud resources on time. timed out waiting for the condition
...
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
Revert "Pods pending due to insufficient OIR should get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available."
Reverts kubernetes/kubernetes#41870 for stopping bleeding edge: #42597
cc/ @ConnorDoyle @kubernetes/release-team
Connor if there is a pending pr to fix the issue, please point it out to me. We can close this one, otherwise, I would like to revert the pr first. You can resubmit the fix. Thanks!
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42080, 41653, 42598, 42555)
StatefulSet: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings StatefulSet into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#36859
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
StatefulSet now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods. At the time of upgrade, **you must not have StatefulSets with selectors that overlap** with any other controllers (such as ReplicaSets), or else [ownership of Pods may change](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md#upgrading).
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41826, 42405)
Fixed too long name in HPA e2e upgrade test.
Fixed too long name in HPA e2e upgrade test.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41826, 42405)
Add stubDomains and upstreamNameservers configuration to kube-dns
```release-note
Updates the dnsmasq cache/mux layer to be managed by dnsmasq-nanny.
dnsmasq-nanny manages dnsmasq based on values from the
kube-system:kube-dns configmap:
"stubDomains": {
"acme.local": ["1.2.3.4"]
},
is a map of domain to list of nameservers for the domain. This is used
to inject private DNS domains into the kube-dns namespace. In the above
example, any DNS requests for *.acme.local will be served by the
nameserver 1.2.3.4.
"upstreamNameservers": ["8.8.8.8", "8.8.4.4"]
is a list of upstreamNameservers to use, overriding the configuration
specified in /etc/resolv.conf.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 31783, 41988, 42535, 42572, 41870)
Pods pending due to insufficient OIR should get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available.
This appears to be a regression since v1.5.0 in scheduler behavior for opaque integer resources, reported in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41861.
- [X] Add failing e2e test to trigger the regression
- [x] Restore previous behavior (pods pending due to insufficient OIR get scheduled once sufficient OIR becomes available.)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 31783, 41988, 42535, 42572, 41870)
update names for kube plugin initializer to avoid conflicts
Fixes#42581
Other API servers are likely to create admission plugin initializers and so the names we choose for our interfaces matter (they may want to run multiple initializers in the chain). This updates the names for the plugin initializers to be more specific. No other changes.
@ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove the kube-discovery binary from the tree
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
kube-discovery was a temporary solution to implementing proposal: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/bootstrap-discovery.md
However, this functionality is now gonna be implemented in the core for v1.6 and will fully replace kube-discovery:
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36101
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41281
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41417
So due to that `kube-discovery` isn't used in any v1.6 code, it should be removed.
The image `gcr.io/google_containers/kube-discovery-${ARCH}:1.0` should and will continue to exist so kubeadm <= v1.5 continues to work.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove cmd/kube-discovery from the tree since it's not necessary anymore
```
@jbeda @dgoodwin @mikedanese @dmmcquay @lukemarsden @errordeveloper @pires
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add ProviderUid support to Federated Ingress
This PR (along with GLBC support [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/pull/278)) is a proposed fix for #39989. The Ingress controller uses a configMap reconciliation process to ensure that all underlying ingresses agree on a unique UID. This works for all of GLBC's resources except firewalls which need their own cluster-unique UID. This PR introduces a ProviderUid which is maintained and synchronized cross-cluster much like the UID. We chose to derive the ProviderUid from the cluster name (via md5 hash).
Testing here is augmented to guarantee that configMaps are adequately propagated prior to Ingress creation.
```release-note
Federated Ingress over GCE no longer requires separate firewall rules to be created for each cluster to circumvent flapping firewall health checks.
```
cc @madhusudancs @quinton-hoole
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42456, 42457, 42414, 42480, 42370)
In DaemonSet e2e test, don't check nodes with NoSchedule taints
Fixes#42345
For example, master node has a ismaster:NoSchedule taint. We don't expect pods to be created there without toleration.
cc @marun @lukaszo @kargakis @yujuhong @Random-Liu @davidopp @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42456, 42457, 42414, 42480, 42370)
node e2e: apparmor test should fail instead of panicking
This doesn't fix#42420, but at least stop the test from panicking.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42456, 42457, 42414, 42480, 42370)
Update npd in kubemark since #42201 is merged.
Revert https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41716.
#42201 has been merged, and #41713 is fixed. Now we could retry update npd in kubemark.
/cc @shyamjvs @wojtek-t @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42369, 42375, 42397, 42435, 42455)
Add alsologtostderr flag to hollow node
@yujuhong @wojtek-t that should solve the kubemark log issue.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42369, 42375, 42397, 42435, 42455)
[Bug Fix]: Avoid evicting more pods than necessary by adding Timestamps for fsstats and ignoring stale stats
Continuation of #33121. Credit for most of this goes to @sjenning. I added volume fs timestamps.
**why is this a bug**
This PR attempts to fix part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/31362 which results in multiple pods getting evicted unnecessarily whenever the node runs into resource pressure. This PR reduces the chances of such disruptions by avoiding reacting to old/stale metrics.
Without this PR, kubernetes nodes under resource pressure will cause unnecessary disruptions to user workloads.
This PR will also help deflake a node e2e test suite.
The eviction manager currently avoids evicting pods if metrics are old. However, timestamp data is not available for filesystem data, and this causes lots of extra evictions.
See the [inode eviction test flakes](https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/google-node#kubelet-flaky-gce-e2e) for examples.
This should probably be treated as a bugfix, as it should help mitigate extra evictions.
cc: @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @vishh @derekwaynecarr @sjenning
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Eviction Manager Enforces Allocatable Thresholds
This PR modifies the eviction manager to enforce node allocatable thresholds for memory as described in kubernetes/community#348.
This PR should be merged after #41234.
cc @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests @vishh
** Why is this a bug/regression**
Kubelet uses `oom_score_adj` to enforce QoS policies. But the `oom_score_adj` is based on overall memory requested, which means that a Burstable pod that requested a lot of memory can lead to OOM kills for Guaranteed pods, which violates QoS. Even worse, we have observed system daemons like kubelet or kube-proxy being killed by the OOM killer.
Without this PR, v1.6 will have node stability issues and regressions in an existing GA feature `out of Resource` handling.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42443, 38924, 42367, 42391, 42310)
Fix StatefulSet e2e flake
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes StatefulSet e2e flake by ensuring that the StatefulSet controller has observed the unreadiness of Pods prior to attempting to exercise scale functionality.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes#41889
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42443, 38924, 42367, 42391, 42310)
Cast system uptime to time.Duration to fix cross build.
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42441.
Cast system uptime to `time.Duration` to avoid different behavior on different architectures.
@sjenning @ixdy @ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Critial pod test uses allocatable instead of capacity
This solves #42239.
When this test was first introduced, pods could request up to the capacity of the node.
With the addition of allocatable introduced in #41234, this is no longer the case, and pods can only use up to allocatable.
This should be included in 1.6, as it is a bug related to a 1.6 feature.
cc @vish @yujuhong
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41306, 42187, 41666, 42275, 42266)
Bump test timeouts to make secret tests work in large clusters
The previous Get/Update pattern with no retry on resource version mismatch
would flake with the following error:
"the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest
version and try again"
gives each ingress object a cluster-unique Uid that can be
leveraged by ingress providers.
In the process, supplement the testing of configMap updates to
ensure that the updates are propagated prior to any ingress
object being created. Configmap key/vals for Uid and ProviderUid
must exist at time of Ingress creation.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41984, 41682, 41924, 41928)
Move node problem detector test into node e2e.
Move current NPD e2e test into node e2e.
In fact, current NPD e2e test is only a functionality test for NPD. It creates test NPD pod, sets test configuration, generates test logs and verifies test result.
It doesn't actually test the NPD really deployed in the cluster.
So it doesn't actually need to run in cluster e2e. Running it in node e2e will:
1) Make it easier to run the test.
2) Make it more light weight to introduce this as a pre/post submit test in NPD repo in the future.
Except this, I'm working on a cluster e2e to run some basic functionality test and benchmark test against the real NPD deployed in the cluster. Will send the PR later.
/cc @dchen1107 @kubernetes/node-problem-detector-reviewers
