Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55900, 55995, 55913, 55467, 55376). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use structured generator for kubectl autoscale
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Use structured generator for kubectl autoscale
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
part of # https://github.com/kubernetes/kubectl/issues/138
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @mengqiy
**Release note**:
```release-note
Use structured generator for kubectl autoscale
```
Also remove error messages that depended on ObjectKinds() - future
changes will potentially remove this interface and the replacements here
are equivalent.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53337, 55465, 55512, 55522, 54554). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
switch UpdatePodSpecForObject to work on v1.PodSpec, use info.VersionedObject, and avoid conversion completely
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
ref #54212
ref #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubectl/issues/83
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @liggitt @pwittrock
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54460, 55258, 54858, 55506, 55510). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add create subcommand for priorityclass
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
add `create priorityclass` sub command
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:Fixes #54857
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
add create priorityclass sub command
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50016, 49583, 49930, 46254, 50337)
Remove scheduledjobs
This is a prerequisite for promoting CronJobs to beta.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove deprecated ScheduledJobs endpoints, use CronJobs instead.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
add secret option to flag
To resolve the issue of security(pr #35030 ),
> @smarterclayton commented 5 days ago
> This is unfortunately not all flags that could be secrets. The best option would be to add support in spf13/pflag to tag a flag as a secret, and then use that bit to determine the list.
>
> Also, Command() could be used in contexts that need exact parameters (for subshell execution), so we would need to add a new method or extend the signature here to allow exact flags to be retrieved.
we could add a secret option to the flags.
The factory knows all possible types, and should abstract the process of
creating all printers. A future refactor can further reduce the
dependencies between printer code and internal types.
