When allocation was done by the scheduler, the controller needs to do the
deallocation because there is no control-plane controller which could react to
"DeallocationRequested".
Controls the lifecycle of the ServiceCIDRs adding finalizers and
setting the Ready condition in status when they are created, and
removing the finalizers once it is safe to remove (no orphan IPAddresses)
An IPAddress is orphan if there are no ServiceCIDR containing it.
Change-Id: Icbe31e1ed8525fa04df3b741c8a817e5f2a49e80
* [API REVIEW] ValidatingAdmissionPolicyStatucController config.
worker count.
* ValidatingAdmissionPolicyStatus controller.
* remove CEL typechecking from API server.
* fix initializer tests.
* remove type checking integration tests
from API server integration tests.
* validatingadmissionpolicy-status options.
* grant access to VAP controller.
* add defaulting unit test.
* generated: ./hack/update-codegen.sh
* add OWNERS for VAP status controller.
* type checking test case.
When someone decides that a Pod should definitely run on a specific node, they
can create the Pod with spec.nodeName already set. Some custom scheduler might
do that. Then kubelet starts to check the pod and (if DRA is enabled) will
refuse to run it, either because the claims are still waiting for the first
consumer or the pod wasn't added to reservedFor. Both are things the scheduler
normally does.
Also, if a pod got scheduled while the DRA feature was off in the
kube-scheduler, a pod can reach the same state.
The resource claim controller can handle these two cases by taking over for the
kube-scheduler when nodeName is set. Triggering an allocation is simpler than
in the scheduler because all it takes is creating the right
PodSchedulingContext with spec.selectedNode set. There's no need to list nodes
because that choice was already made, permanently. Adding the pod to
reservedFor also isn't hard.
What's currently missing is triggering de-allocation of claims to re-allocate
them for the desired node. This is not important for claims that get created
for the pod from a template and then only get used once, but it might be
worthwhile to add de-allocation in the future.
Generating the name avoids all potential name collisions. It's not clear how
much of a problem that was because users can avoid them and the deterministic
names for generic ephemeral volumes have not led to reports from users. But
using generated names is not too hard either.
What makes it relatively easy is that the new pod.status.resourceClaimStatus
map stores the generated name for kubelet and node authorizer, i.e. the
information in the pod is sufficient to determine the name of the
ResourceClaim.
The resource claim controller becomes a bit more complex and now needs
permission to modify the pod status. The new failure scenario of "ResourceClaim
created, updating pod status fails" is handled with the help of a new special
"resource.kubernetes.io/pod-claim-name" annotation that together with the owner
reference identifies exactly for what a ResourceClaim was generated, so
updating the pod status can be retried for existing ResourceClaims.
The transition from deterministic names is handled with a special case for that
recovery code path: a ResourceClaim with no annotation and a name that follows
the Kubernetes <= 1.27 naming pattern is assumed to be generated for that pod
claim and gets added to the pod status.
There's no immediate need for it, but just in case that it may become relevant,
the name of the generated ResourceClaim may also be left unset to record that
no claim was needed. Components processing such a pod can skip whatever they
normally would do for the claim. To ensure that they do and also cover other
cases properly ("no known field is set", "must check ownership"),
resourceclaim.Name gets extended.
When a pod is done, but not getting removed yet for while, then a claim that
got generated for that pod can be deleted already. This then also triggers
deallocation.
When StatefulSetAutoDeletePVC feature gate is enabled, StatefulSet
controller updates ownerReferences on managed PVCs. To be able to pass
OwnerReferencesPermissionEnforcement admission, it must have permissions to
delete PVCs.
The controller uses the exact same logic as the generic ephemeral inline volume
controller, just for inline ResourceClaimTemplate -> ResourceClaim.
In addition, it supports removal of pods from the ReservedFor field when those
pods are known to not need the claim anymore. At the moment, only this special
case is supported. Removal of arbitrary objects would imply granting full read
access to all types to determine whether a) an object is gone and b) if the
current incarnation is the one which is listed in ReservedFor. This may get
added later.
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDR` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
- PreemptionByKubeScheduler (Pod preempted by kube-scheduler)
- DeletionByTaintManager (Pod deleted by taint manager due to NoExecute taint)
- EvictionByEvictionAPI (Pod evicted by Eviction API)
- DeletionByPodGC (an orphaned Pod deleted by PodGC)PreemptedByScheduler (Pod preempted by kube-scheduler)
* Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api, ClusterCIDRConfig type
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDRConfig` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
* Change ClusterCIDRConfig.NodeSelector type in api
* Fix review comments for API
* Update ClusterCIDRConfig API Spec
Introduce PerNodeHostBits field, remove PerNodeMaskSize
The feature gate gets locked to "true", with the goal to remove it in two
releases.
All code now can assume that the feature is enabled. Tests for "feature
disabled" are no longer needed and get removed.
Some code wasn't using the new helper functions yet. That gets changed while
touching those lines.
Since external metrics were added, we weren't running the HPA with
metrics REST clients by default, so we had no bootstrap policy to enable
the HPA controller to talk to the external metrics API.
This change adds permissions for the HPA controller to list and get
external.metrics.k8s.io by default as already done for the
custom.metrics.k8s.io API.
Signed-off-by: Damien Grisonnet <dgrisonn@redhat.com>
Through Job.status.uncountedPodUIDs and a Pod finalizer
An annotation marks if a job should be tracked with new behavior
A separate work queue is used to remove finalizers from orphan pods.
Change-Id: I1862e930257a9d1f7f1b2b0a526ed15bc8c248ad
The implementation consists of
- identifying all places where VolumeSource.PersistentVolumeClaim has
a special meaning and then ensuring that the same code path is taken
for an ephemeral volume, with the ownership check
- adding a controller that produces the PVCs for each embedded
VolumeSource.EphemeralVolume
- relaxing the PVC protection controller such that it removes
the finalizer already before the pod is deleted (only
if the GenericEphemeralVolume feature is enabled): this is
needed to break a cycle where foreground deletion of the pod
blocks on removing the PVC, which waits for deletion of the pod
The controller was derived from the endpointslices controller.
The controller needs to be able to set a service's finalizers to be
able to create an EndpointSlice resource that is owned by the service
and sets blockOwnerDeletion=true in its ownerRef.
