Commit Graph

930 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kubernetes Submit Queue
7c9e614cbb Merge pull request #52873 from ixdy/bazel-cleanup
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>..

bazel: build/test almost everything

**What this PR does / why we need it**: Miscellaneous cleanups and bug fixes. The main motivating idea here was to make `bazel build //...` and `bazel test //...` mostly work. (There's a few reasons these still don't work, but we're a lot closer.)

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```

/assign @BenTheElder @mikedanese @spxtr
2017-09-24 00:04:36 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
6e9012c94c Merge pull request #52137 from aveshagarwal/master-scheduler-resources-consolidation
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51902, 52718, 52687, 52137, 52697). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>..

Consolidate extended resources and hugepages in Scheduler

Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/51732

@bsalamat @derekwaynecarr @sjenning @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews
2017-09-23 19:49:54 -07:00
Jeff Grafton
532bd482df Use buildozer to remove deprecated automanaged tags 2017-09-21 15:53:22 -07:00
Avesh Agarwal
ae05a6da34 Consolidate extended resources and hugepages in Scheduler. 2017-09-18 09:32:16 -04:00
Avesh Agarwal
3e8a8286d8 Bugfix to check overcommit for hugepages. 2017-09-15 10:40:27 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt
fe6af20910
Generated files 2017-09-07 14:18:40 -04:00
Derek Carr
38d5dee677 Node validation restricts pre-allocated hugepages to single page size 2017-09-05 10:34:30 -04:00
Derek Carr
41a4e2ccad Scheduler support for hugepages 2017-09-05 09:46:08 -04:00
Derek Carr
afd8045ed7 HugePage changes in API and server 2017-09-05 09:46:08 -04:00
Hemant Kumar
84029c2c1a Update generated files - api, bazel, json
Update all generated files json, protocolbuffers,
documentation
2017-09-04 09:02:35 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
6ec80eac1b Merge pull request #51816 from liggitt/xiangpengzhao-remove-initc-anno
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Remove deprecated init-container in annotations

fixes #50655
fixes #51816 
closes #41004
fixes #51816 

Builds on #50654 and drops the initContainer annotations on conversion to prevent bypassing API server validation/security and targeting version-skewed kubelets that still honor the annotations

```release-note
The deprecated alpha and beta initContainer annotations are no longer supported. Init containers must be specified using the initContainers field in the pod spec.
```
2017-09-03 17:35:11 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
a31bc44b38 Merge pull request #51500 from m1093782566/fix-kube-proxy-panic
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51819, 51706, 51761, 51818, 51500)

fix kube-proxy panic because of nil sessionAffinityConfig

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

fix kube-proxy panic because of nil sessionAffinityConfig

**Which issue this PR fixes**: closes #51499 

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

I apology that this bug is introduced by #49850 :(

@thockin @smarterclayton @gnufied 

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-09-03 15:00:15 -07:00
Jan Safranek
c49e34fd17 Add API for mount propagation.
In fact, this is one annotation + its parsing & validation. Appropriate
kubelet logic that uses this annotation is in following patches.
2017-09-01 21:36:32 +02:00
Jordan Liggitt
525254a3d1
Drop alpha/beta init containers annotations on conversion 2017-09-01 14:45:08 -04:00
m1093782566
1faa6f56b9 fix kube-proxy panic 2017-09-01 16:18:03 +08:00
Jing Xu
e1460efcf2 Generated files
generated files
2017-08-30 12:45:41 -07:00
Jing Xu
4d6da1fd9a Change SizeLimit to a pointer
This PR fixes issue #50121
2017-08-30 11:50:35 -07:00
Dr. Stefan Schimanski
362439db64 pkg/api: simplify deepcopy calls 2017-08-29 20:04:05 +02:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
ae17c1f2bf Merge pull request #50919 from wongma7/mount-options
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50919, 51410, 50099, 51300, 50296)

Take mount options to GA by adding PV.spec.mountOptions

**What this PR does / why we need it**: Implements https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/771

issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/168

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

TODO:
- ~StorageClass mountOptions~

As described in proposal, this adds PV.spec.mountOptions + mountOptions parameter to every plugin that is both provisionable & supports mount options.

(personally, even having done all the work already, i don't agree w/ the proposal that mountOptions should be SC parameter but... :))

**Release note**:

```release-note
Add mount options field to PersistentVolume spec
```
2017-08-29 03:20:00 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
9f6c61bba3 Merge pull request #50435 from NickrenREN/localstorage-downwardapi
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51471, 50561, 50435, 51473, 51436)

Add local storage to downwards API

**Release note**:
```release-note
Add local ephemeral storage to downward API 
```


/assign @NickrenREN
2017-08-29 02:22:13 -07:00
Matthew Wong
9e37133a1f Generated PV.Spec.MountOptions code 2017-08-28 14:20:48 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
3b2417a7f8 Merge pull request #51305 from hzxuzhonghu/validation-fix
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49861, 50933, 51380, 50688, 51305)

fix v1 validation return error

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #51304 

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-08-27 22:20:57 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
217513e27a Merge pull request #45294 from liggitt/proto-slices
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Remove null -> [] slice hack

Closes #44593

When 1.6 added protobuf storage, the storage layer lost the ability to persist slice fields with empty but non-null values.

As a workaround, we tried to convert empty slice fields to `[]`, rather than `null`. Compressing `null` -> `[]` was just as much of an API breakage as `[]` -> `null`, but was hoped to cause fewer problems in clients that don't do null checks.

Because of conversion optimizations around converting lists of objects, the `null` -> `[]` hack was discovered to only apply to individual get requests, not to a list of objects. 1.6 and 1.7 was released with this behavior, and the world didn't explode. 1.7 documented the breaking API change that `null` and `[]` should be considered equivalent, unless otherwise noted on a particular field.

This PR:

* Reverts the earlier attempt (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43422) at ensuring non-null json slice output in conversion
* Makes results of `get` consistent with the results of `list` (which helps naive clients that do deepequal comparisons of objects obtained via list/watch and get), and allows empty slice fields to be returned as `null`

```release-note
Protobuf serialization does not distinguish between `[]` and `null`.
API fields previously capable of storing and returning either `[]` and `null` via JSON API requests (for example, the Endpoints `subsets` field) can now store only `null` when created using the protobuf content-type or stored in etcd using protobuf serialization (the default in 1.6+). JSON API clients should tolerate `null` values for such fields, and treat `null` and `[]` as equivalent in meaning unless specifically documented otherwise for a particular field.
```
2017-08-26 13:35:29 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
6650bbe0dd Merge pull request #50582 from dixudx/support_fieldSelector_spec.schedulerName
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50889, 51347, 50582, 51297, 51264)

support fieldSelector spec.schedulerName

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #49190

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @davidopp  @bsalamat
/cc @lavalamp

**Release note**:

```release-note
add fieldSelector spec.schedulerName
```
2017-08-25 22:43:32 -07:00
NickrenREN
194418986f Add local storage to downwards API 2017-08-26 11:58:21 +08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
b65f3cc8dd Merge pull request #49850 from m1093782566/service-session-timeout
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49850, 47782, 50595, 50730, 51341)

Paramaterize `stickyMaxAgeMinutes` for service in API

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

Currently I find `stickyMaxAgeMinutes` for a session affinity type service is hard code to 180min. There is a TODO comment, see

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier.go#L205

I think the seesion sticky max time varies from service to service and users may not aware of it since it's hard coded in all proxier.go - iptables, userspace and winuserspace.

Once we parameterize it in API, users can set/get the values for their different services.

Perhaps, we can introduce a new field `api.ClientIPAffinityConfig` in `api.ServiceSpec`.

There is an initial discussion about it in sig-network group. See,

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/kubernetes-sig-network/i-LkeHrjs80

**Which issue this PR fixes**: 

fixes #49831

**Special notes for your reviewer**:

**Release note**:

```release-note
Paramaterize session affinity timeout seconds in service API for Client IP based session affinity.
```
2017-08-25 20:43:30 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt
c7defb806f
Generated files 2017-08-25 15:01:08 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
d7965e9331 Merge pull request #51197 from deads2k/api-02-field-default
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51114, 51233, 51024, 51053, 51197)

default field selectors

We have a lot of code around field selectors that doesn't add much value. Every gettable resources probably wants name and namespace by default and since they all use metav1 (today), we can assign that as a default. If we think we'll always have metav1 style name and namespace, then this makes a reasonable default and you can always set something different.

This removes cruft and avoids the risk of accidentally forgetting a field selector.  

@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @smarterclayton
2017-08-25 06:22:20 -07:00
m1093782566
ad73fe68a7 auto gen code 2017-08-25 18:28:14 +08:00
xiangpengzhao
8719b4a8ea Remove deprecated init-container in annotations 2017-08-25 13:39:29 +08:00
hzxuzhonghu
2e0156ad83 fix validation return error 2017-08-25 10:01:21 +08:00
Huamin Chen
9f0aad32b0 generated files
Signed-off-by: Huamin Chen <hchen@redhat.com>
2017-08-24 18:59:08 +00:00
Huamin Chen
8a38cf1b1b generated files
Signed-off-by: Huamin Chen <hchen@redhat.com>
2017-08-24 14:53:00 +00:00
Huamin Chen
4525446af2 azure file volume: add secret namespace api
Signed-off-by: Huamin Chen <hchen@redhat.com>
2017-08-24 14:49:58 +00:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
c041567b5a Merge pull request #46597 from dixudx/implement_proposal_34058
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51113, 46597, 50397, 51052, 51166)

implement proposal 34058: hostPath volume type

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
implement proposal #34058

**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes #46549

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @thockin @luxas @euank PTAL
2017-08-23 23:16:27 -07:00
David Eads
9daf55e173 remove unnecessary field conversions 2017-08-23 10:52:22 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
178a5ff314 Merge pull request #50665 from xiangpengzhao/hardcode-to-const
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50257, 50247, 50665, 50554, 51077)

Replace hard-code "cpu" and "memory" to consts

**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are many places using hard coded "cpu" and "memory" as resource name. This PR replace them to consts.

**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #

**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/kind cleanup

**Release note**:

```release-note
NONE
```
2017-08-23 02:35:09 -07:00
Di Xu
504f89e3ac auto-gen 2017-08-23 15:23:34 +08:00
Di Xu
d0a4af133b set default HostPathType to empty 2017-08-23 14:05:21 +08:00
Di Xu
5c45db564f implement proposal 34058: hostPath volume type 2017-08-23 14:05:21 +08:00
mtanino
b0d4664a27 Autogenerated files 2017-08-21 12:29:32 -04:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
b59ad9cbff Merge pull request #50146 from gmarek/deepcopyinto
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46512, 50146)

Make metav1.(Micro)?Time functions take pointers

Is there any reason for those functions not to be on pointers?
2017-08-19 11:28:15 -07:00
Di Xu
58669f6f1d support fieldSelector spec.schedulerName 2017-08-18 13:32:09 +08:00
gmarek
0504cfbc25 Make metav1.(Micro)?Time functions take pointers 2017-08-17 11:24:28 +02:00
Di Xu
fc0bdb5622 auto-gen 2017-08-17 15:42:05 +08:00
Di Xu
a8742a0643 fix GPU resource validation incorrectly allows zero limits 2017-08-17 15:41:59 +08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue
ce1485c626 Merge pull request #48922 from ConnorDoyle/integer-resources-as-default
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46317, 48922, 50651, 50230, 47599)

Resources outside the `*kubernetes.io` namespace are integers and cannot be over-committed.

**What this PR does / why we need it**:

Fixes #50473 

Rationale: since the scheduler handles all resources except CPU as integers, that could just be the default behavior for namespaced resources.

cc @RenaudWasTaken @vishh 

**Release note**:

```release-note
Resources outside the `*kubernetes.io` namespace are integers and cannot be over-committed.
```
2017-08-16 19:50:15 -07:00
Connor Doyle
630af5422b OIR predicate includes namespaced resources. 2017-08-16 15:29:24 -07:00
xiangpengzhao
1c4dbcf5ca Replace hard-code "cpu" and "memory" to consts 2017-08-16 16:37:50 +08:00
clairew
aeb3b761b2 OpaqueIntResourceName unit tests 2017-08-14 19:23:01 -07:00