In #91342 attempting to evict a Pod with a DeletionTimestamp caused
checking of PDBs to be ignored due to the fact that a Pod scheduled for
deletion should not be factored into a disruption budget. However, PDB
eviction tests currently will sometimes select a Pod already scheduled
for deletion, expecting that attempting to evict it will conflict with
the PDB. This updates those tests to make sure a Pod with deletion
timestamp is not selected for eviction when it is intended to violate a
PDB.
Signed-off-by: hasheddan <georgedanielmangum@gmail.com>
This extends the existing "ephemeral volume" tests to also cover
generic ephemeral inline volumes. They get instantiated for all
drivers (CSI and others) which support persistent volume provisioning,
for several different filesystems.
Configuring the number of inline volumes via a flag with a computed
name had been identified as problematic before and now gets removed
because re-using the tests as a stress test with a higher number of
volumes should be added and configured separately.
This is useful in case that the pod owns some resources, because then
waiting for the pod ensures that those resources also were removed.
This should not matter at the moment because pods typically are not
owners of any other object, but that will change with the introduction
of generic ephemeral inline
volumes (https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-storage/1698-generic-ephemeral-volumes).
The test steps are as follows:
1. Write some data
2. Take a snapshot
3. Write more data
4. Create a new volume from snapshot
5. Validate data is the old data
1. Use ginkgo before each to do common setup
2. Use volume resource to create SC, PV, PVC and handle cleanup
3. Add SnapshotResource to handle creating and cleanup of VS, VSC, VSClass
4. Add test pattern for deletion policy: Delete vs Retain
5. Use test pattern to determine test behaviour
6. Add test pattern for preprovisioned snapshot (not implemented)
These changes are made to consolidate common setup steps and stop resource
leaks by waiting for objects to be deleted.
By creating CSIStorageCapacity objects in advance, we get the
FailedScheduling pod event if (and only if!) the test is expected to
fail because of insufficient or missing capacity. We can use that as
indicator that waiting for pod start can be stopped early. However,
because we might not get to see the event under load, we still need
the timeout.
Setting testParameters.scName had no effect because
StorageClassTest.StorageClassName isn't used anywhere. Instead, the
storage class name is generated dynamically.
