In our current mock CSI driver e2e test, we are not waiting
for the CSI driver register successfully to perform test
including provision PVC. This can lead to timeout when the
csi driver takes longer to register the socket.
This change adds the waiting part so that the system will
wait for up to 10 minutes for the driver to be ready. This
normally won't take this long. However, under a resource
constraint environment it can take longer than expected time.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/93358
As a part of cleaning up inactive members (who haven't been active since
beginning of 2019) from OWNERS files, this commit moves abrarshivani to
emeritus_approvers section.
- Test that client-side apply users don't encounter a conflict with
server-side apply for objects that previously didn't track managedFields
- Test that we stop tracking managed fields with `managedFields: []`
- Test that we stop tracking managed fields when the feature is disabled
As of now, the kubelet is passing the security context to container runtime even
if the security context has invalid options for a particular OS. As a result,
the pod fails to come up on the node. This error is particularly pronounced on
the Windows nodes where kubelet is allowing Linux specific options like SELinux,
RunAsUser etc where as in [documentation](https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/windows/intro-windows-in-kubernetes/#v1-container),
we clearly state they are not supported. This PR ensures that the kubelet strips
the security contexts of the pod, if they don't make sense on the Windows OS.
This PR fixes a few things for e2e storage suite to run on Windows
cluster.
1. increaes timeout due to longer pod startup time for windows
2. Only set SELinuxOptions or fsGroup if os is not windows
3. Add VolumeSnapshot delete policy for windows3. Add VolumeSnapshot
delete policy for windows3. Add VolumeSnapshot delete policy for windows
Typecheck is still hitting memory limits semi-regularly on periodic CI
jobs. This bumps the default parallelism down to 3 from 4 to make it
slightly less memory intensive.
Signed-off-by: hasheddan <georgedanielmangum@gmail.com>
Some of the tests are negative test cases which are supposed to ensure that those
invalid usecases are handled properly.
However, some of the tests are false positives, they can pass due to various reasons.
One such example is: "should fail substituting values in a volume subpath with absolute path".
This test can pass if:
- the Pod cannot start due to various reasons (e.g.: the container image cannot be pulled or does
not exist).
- the Pod ran to completion, even though the container was not supposed to start in the first place.
