PVC and containers shared the same ResourceRequirements struct to define their
API. When resource claims were added, that struct got extended, which
accidentally also changed the PVC API. To avoid such a mistake from happening
again, PVC now uses its own VolumeResourceRequirements struct.
The `Claims` field gets removed because risk of breaking someone is low:
theoretically, YAML files which have a claims field for volumes now
get rejected when validating against the OpenAPI. Such files
have never made sense and should be fixed.
Code that uses the struct definitions needs to be updated.
* fix: 81134: fix unsafe json for ReleaseControllerRevision
1. Ensures that ReleaseControllerRevision returns a proper json by
marshalling an object into bytes. Otherwise, it returns an error.
2. Also, refactors the code to commonize the merge type
GenerateDeleteOwnerRefStrategicMergeBytes that returns a byte and is
used across ReleasePod, ReleaseControllerRevison
ReleaseReplicaSet.
* Move GeneratePatchBytesForDelete to controller_ref_manager
In addition create a similar method that doesn't copy objects.
Benchmark for the new no-copy method vs the old one:
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkGetControllerOf-12 214 14.8 -93.08%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkGetControllerOf-12 1 0 -100.00%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkGetControllerOf-12 80 0 -100.00%
```
Benchamrk for the new (copy) method vs the old one:
```
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkGetControllerOf-12 128 114 -10.94%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkGetControllerOf-12 1 1 +0.00%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkGetControllerOf-12 80 80 +0.00%
```
Overall there is a 10% improvement for the old vs new (copy) method and
huge improvent (x10) for the old vs new (no-copy).
I changed the IsControlledBy and a few other methods to use the new (no-copy) method.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove incorrect comment
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
These code did not Update the revisions labels, the comment is incorrect
```
// Update the revisions name and labels
clone.Name = ControllerRevisionName(parent.GetName(), hash)
ns := parent.GetNamespace()
created, err := rh.client.AppsV1().ControllerRevisions(ns).Create(clone)
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
/kind cleanup
/release-note-none
/sig apps
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix StatefulSet set-based selector bug
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
ControllerRevisions were using selectors as the labels, in case of set-based selectors, the helper function to convert selectors to labels would break. This PR uses pod labels for ControllerRevision labels instead of selectors.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#59266
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I'm trying to learn Kubernetes codebase and would be happy to make changes if anything is off.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Fix StatefulSet to work with set-based selectors.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47958, 46261, 46667, 47709, 47579)
use appsv1beta1 for statefulsets
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46922
