There are some tests which want to insert a tag before the main Describe text,
for example:
sigDescribe("[Feature:Windows] Cpu Resources [Serial]",
skipUnlessWindows(func() { ... })
In order to support this without change existing test names, it must be
possible to do this instead:
sigDescribe(feature.Windows, "Cpu Resources", framework.WithSerial(),
skipUnlessWindows(func() { ... })
There are similar examples for the other functions.
While at it, replace one left-over panic with ReportBug and add the missing
`NodeFeature:` prefix.
framework.SIGDescribe is better because:
- Ginkgo uses the source code location of the test, not of the wrapper,
when reporting progress.
- Additional annotations can be passed.
To make this a drop-in replacement, framework.SIGDescribe generates a function
that can be used instead of the former SIGDescribe functions.
windows.SIGDescribe contained some additional code to ensure that tests are
skipped when not running with a suitable node OS. This gets moved into a
separate wrapper generator, to allow using framework.SIGDescribe as intended.
To ensure that all callers were modified, the windows.sigDescribe isn't
exported anymore (wasn't necessary in the first place!).
These wrapper functions set labels in addition to injecting the annotation into
the test text. It then becomes possible to select tests in different ways:
ginkgo -v --focus="should respect internalTrafficPolicy.*\[FeatureGate:ServiceInternalTrafficPolicy\]"
ginkgo -v --label-filter="FeatureGate:ServiceInternalTrafficPolicy"
ginkgo -v --label-filter="Beta"
When a test runs, ginkgo shows it as:
[It] should respect internalTrafficPolicy=Local Pod to Pod [FeatureGate:ServiceInternalTrafficPolicy] [Beta] [FeatureGate:ServiceInternalTrafficPolicy, Beta]
The test name and the labels at the end are in different colors. Embedding the
annotations inside the text is redundant and only done because users of the e2e
suite might expect it. Also, our tooling that consumes test results currently
doesn't know about ginkgo labels.
Environments, features and node features as described by
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-testing/3041-node-conformance-and-features
are also supported.
The framework and thus (at the moment) test/e2e do not have any pre-defined
environments and features. Adding those and modifying tests will follow in
a separate commit.
If something goes wrong during the test registration phase, the only solution
so far was to panic. This is not user-friendly and only allows to report one
problem at a time.
If initialization can continue, then a better solution is to record a bug,
continue, and then report all bugs together.
This also works when just listing tests. The new verify-e2e-suites.sh uses that
to check all test suites (identified as "packages that call
framework.AfterReadingAllFlags", with some exceptions) as part of
pull-kubernetes-verify.
Example output for a fake
framework.RecordBug(framework.NewBug("fake bug during SIGDescribe", 0))
in test/e2e/storage/volume_metrics.go:
```
$ hack/verify-e2e-suites.sh
go version go1.21.1 linux/amd64
ERROR: E2E test suite invocation failed for test/e2e.
ERROR: E2E suite initialization was faulty, these errors must be fixed:
ERROR: test/e2e/storage/volume_metrics.go:49: fake bug during SIGDescribe
E2E suite test/e2e_kubeadm passed.
E2E suite test/e2e_node passed.
```
If we were to add new fields in TimeoutContext, the current users of
NewFrameworkWithCustomTimeouts might run into failures unless they get modified
to also set those new fields. This is error-prone.
A better approach is to let users of NewFrameworkWithCustomTimeouts override
fields by setting just those and use the normal defaults for the others.
The old tests were no longer passing with Ginkgo v2.5.0. Instead of keeping the
old approach of checking recorded spec results, now the tests actually cover
what we care about most: the results recorded in JUnit.
This also gets rid of having to repeat the stack backtrace twice (once as part
of the output, once for the separate backtrace field).
The wrapper can be used in combination with ginkgo.DeferCleanup to ignore
harmless "not found" errors during delete operations.
Original code suggested by Onsi Fakhouri.
Adding the "context" import in the previous commit must get compensated by
removing one of the blank lines in the output unit tests, otherwise the stack
backtrace don't match expectations.
Every ginkgo callback should return immediately when a timeout occurs or the
test run manually gets aborted with CTRL-C. To do that, they must take a ctx
parameter and pass it through to all code which might block.
This is a first automated step towards that: the additional parameter got added
with
sed -i 's/\(framework.ConformanceIt\|ginkgo.It\)\(.*\)func() {$/\1\2func(ctx context.Context) {/' \
$(git grep -l -e framework.ConformanceIt -e ginkgo.It )
$GOPATH/bin/goimports -w $(git status | grep modified: | sed -e 's/.* //')
log_test.go was left unchanged.
This adds test coverage for NewFrameworkExtensions and shows better how
BeforeEach callbacks are invokved. The unit test is not strictly about just the
cleanup operations anymore, but that's okay(ish).
etcd only fully supports linux && amd64, the other architectures
and OS are only guaranteed to build, see:
https://etcd.io/docs/v3.5/op-guide/supported-platform/#support-tiers
Skip the test that use etcd on not well supported environment to
guarantee the stability of the test.
When Ginkgo shows a BeforeEach/AfterEach/DeferCleanup, then it can only show
the source code where the callback was registered because there is no
description parameter. This can be improved by passing a custom CodeLocation.
Because a description like "set up framework" might not be enough, the source
code is still shown, too.
If the control plane emits anything at the time when the test runs, for example
"unable to sync kubernetes service", the test breaks because that additional
output is unexpected.
This covers multiple facets of the current framework and of Ginkgo:
- Ginkgo output is verbose and includes detailed progress
messages (BeforeEach/AfterEach tracing).
- Namespace creation.
- Order of callback invocation.
